Why do we keep Ray Allen? Well give me a better alternative. There is none. If we lose him then we need to replace his position with either TA or someone at the MLE.
I don't want TA starting for us his inability to finish and his being prone to turnovers makes him a bench player.
If we use the MLE to sign a 2, to replace him then, we can't use the MLE to sign someone that will make our bench better.
Maybe he didn't have the greatest series but he's a heck of a lot better than anyone we could get to replace him if we didn't resign him.
Kinda where I'm at. Again, Mike Miller as a possibility at the MLE, but is he really BETTER than Ray Allen? Iravis Outlaw? JJ Reddick?
But, those are all guys that I think can make Ray Allen better, just by letting Ray keep his minutes down, take a few games off, save his legs for when it counts.
Would love to see a real sixth man again, basically a sixth starter who would be able to give us 30-35 solid minutes a night and keep our "stars" fresh.
Not sure we'd be able to get much in a S&T for Ray, certainly not getting a player that's a #1-scoring option-type.
One thing I *do* know now; no way in hell Ray Allen ought to get a three-year contract. I don't care about the dollars too much, but no way I want him on the books past 2012.