Author Topic: Hollinger: C's Better Without Perk  (Read 6207 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hollinger: C's Better Without Perk
« on: June 16, 2010, 06:23:31 PM »

Offline PosImpos

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12383
  • Tommy Points: 903
  • Rondo = Good
Never forget the Champs of '08, or the gutsy warriors of '10.

"I know you all wanna win, but you gotta do it TOGETHER!"
- Doc Rivers

Re: Hollinger: C's Better Without Perk
« Reply #1 on: June 16, 2010, 06:32:35 PM »

Offline FallGuy

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1941
  • Tommy Points: 70
Couple quotes:

Quote
Perkins is a tremendous defensive player, especially against big low-post centers, and he showed his value in the previous two rounds of the playoffs with his ability to check Shaquille O'Neal and Dwight Howard without double-team help. He also is a quality help defender and provides a physical aspect to Boston's technically proficient but otherwise lightly muscled defensive operation.

In other words, he brings a lot of things to the table that are of little to no value in this series. With Los Angeles' starting center, Andrew Bynum, also sidelined by a knee problem that appears to be worsening -- he pulled himself out of Game 6 after 16 unproductive minutes -- Boston appears to have little need for a counter to the impressive size of the Lakers behemoth.

And if Perkins, a liability on offense, isn't needed at the defensive end, he produces a negative net worth. He is averaging an anemic 9.9 points per 40 minutes for the series, and his reluctance to take open 15-foot jump shots because of a lingering wrist injury has allowed the Lakers to leave him and play help defense on other Celtics with impunity. In fact, he hasn't attempted a shot more than 5 feet from the basket the entire series. That's why he's often been on the pine in fourth quarters.

Re: Hollinger: C's Better Without Perk
« Reply #2 on: June 16, 2010, 06:35:46 PM »

Offline luckthefakers

  • Xavier Tillman Sr.
  • Posts: 44
  • Tommy Points: 11
Hollinger is a chode but he's correct on this one.  If Sheed can stay on the floor, he's much more suited for those minutes than Perkins was going to be.

Re: Hollinger: C's Better Without Perk
« Reply #3 on: June 16, 2010, 06:36:16 PM »

Offline clover

  • Front Page Moderator
  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6130
  • Tommy Points: 315
Couple quotes:

Quote
Perkins is a tremendous defensive player, especially against big low-post centers, and he showed his value in the previous two rounds of the playoffs with his ability to check Shaquille O'Neal and Dwight Howard without double-team help. He also is a quality help defender and provides a physical aspect to Boston's technically proficient but otherwise lightly muscled defensive operation.

In other words, he brings a lot of things to the table that are of little to no value in this series. With Los Angeles' starting center, Andrew Bynum, also sidelined by a knee problem that appears to be worsening -- he pulled himself out of Game 6 after 16 unproductive minutes -- Boston appears to have little need for a counter to the impressive size of the Lakers behemoth.

And if Perkins, a liability on offense, isn't needed at the defensive end, he produces a negative net worth. He is averaging an anemic 9.9 points per 40 minutes for the series, and his reluctance to take open 15-foot jump shots because of a lingering wrist injury has allowed the Lakers to leave him and play help defense on other Celtics with impunity. In fact, he hasn't attempted a shot more than 5 feet from the basket the entire series. That's why he's often been on the pine in fourth quarters.


So, just to be  fair, he's saying they're better without an injured Perk.

Re: Hollinger: C's Better Without Perk
« Reply #4 on: June 16, 2010, 06:47:04 PM »

Offline incoherent

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1856
  • Tommy Points: 278
  • 7 + 11 = 18
I think he's wrong about this like he has been about everything.

Re: Hollinger: C's Better Without Perk
« Reply #5 on: June 16, 2010, 06:49:23 PM »

Offline Cman

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13074
  • Tommy Points: 121
Well, Hollinger's endorsement is pretty much the kiss of death.

Hollinger's endorsement is second only to Barkley.  And please don't tell me that Barkley is now betting the farm on the Cs winning....
Celtics fan for life.

Re: Hollinger: C's Better Without Perk
« Reply #6 on: June 16, 2010, 06:50:34 PM »

Offline tenn_smoothie

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7181
  • Tommy Points: 846
hollinger put a silver lining on an awful Celtic injury right before game 7 ??

was he drunk ?
The Four Celtic Generals:
Russell - Cowens - Bird - Garnett

The Four Celtic Lieutenants:
Cousy - Havlicek - McHale - Pierce

Re: Hollinger: C's Better Without Perk
« Reply #7 on: June 16, 2010, 06:55:31 PM »

Offline PosImpos

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12383
  • Tommy Points: 903
  • Rondo = Good
I'd love to see the Celtics differential in rebounding when it's KG + Perk out there versus KG + Sheed.

I imagine it's horrifying.
Never forget the Champs of '08, or the gutsy warriors of '10.

"I know you all wanna win, but you gotta do it TOGETHER!"
- Doc Rivers

Re: Hollinger: C's Better Without Perk
« Reply #8 on: June 16, 2010, 06:56:01 PM »

Offline FallGuy

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1941
  • Tommy Points: 70
It's a pretty good piece. He also talks about the C's maybe going small, the danger of using Scal/Shelden if the starters get into foul trouble, and a few other things. I'd post more of it, but I don't want to violate any blog/copyright rules.

Re: Hollinger: C's Better Without Perk
« Reply #9 on: June 16, 2010, 07:06:14 PM »

Offline Tenacious D

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1736
  • Tommy Points: 232
What Hollinger leaves out (typical) is Perk's effectiveness in bodying up Gaso', pushing him off the line and generally disrupting Pau-boys game. All holly can measure is offensive stats. Still think the C's can weather this but KG, Perk, Baby and (?Scal? Sheldon?) are gonna have to step up in a big way.
"Celtics Bring Structure And Discipline To A Chaotic World"

Re: Hollinger: C's Better Without Perk
« Reply #10 on: June 16, 2010, 07:08:22 PM »

Offline guava_wrench

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9931
  • Tommy Points: 777
Couple quotes:

Quote
Perkins is a tremendous defensive player, especially against big low-post centers, and he showed his value in the previous two rounds of the playoffs with his ability to check Shaquille O'Neal and Dwight Howard without double-team help. He also is a quality help defender and provides a physical aspect to Boston's technically proficient but otherwise lightly muscled defensive operation.

In other words, he brings a lot of things to the table that are of little to no value in this series. With Los Angeles' starting center, Andrew Bynum, also sidelined by a knee problem that appears to be worsening -- he pulled himself out of Game 6 after 16 unproductive minutes -- Boston appears to have little need for a counter to the impressive size of the Lakers behemoth.

And if Perkins, a liability on offense, isn't needed at the defensive end, he produces a negative net worth. He is averaging an anemic 9.9 points per 40 minutes for the series, and his reluctance to take open 15-foot jump shots because of a lingering wrist injury has allowed the Lakers to leave him and play help defense on other Celtics with impunity. In fact, he hasn't attempted a shot more than 5 feet from the basket the entire series. That's why he's often been on the pine in fourth quarters.


So, just to be  fair, he's saying they're better without an injured Perk.
Yeah, Hollinger makes a good point about the wrist injury. Perk took that baseline short jumper effectively in earlier rounds. Now his man can clog the lane.

Re: Hollinger: C's Better Without Perk
« Reply #11 on: June 16, 2010, 07:09:00 PM »

Offline guava_wrench

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9931
  • Tommy Points: 777
What Hollinger leaves out (typical) is Perk's effectiveness in bodying up Gaso', pushing him off the line and generally disrupting Pau-boys game. All holly can measure is offensive stats. Still think the C's can weather this but KG, Perk, Baby and (?Scal? Sheldon?) are gonna have to step up in a big way.
He probably feels that KG and Sheed can do that quite fine.

Re: Hollinger: C's Better Without Perk
« Reply #12 on: June 16, 2010, 07:34:36 PM »

Offline Yugocelt

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 224
  • Tommy Points: 25
I don't know, I just don't buy it.   His defense and rebounding we need, thats for sure.  Sheed is apt to get into foul trouble as well.

Re: Hollinger: C's Better Without Perk
« Reply #13 on: June 16, 2010, 07:43:05 PM »

Offline BigBaby

  • Neemias Queta
  • Posts: 182
  • Tommy Points: 9
Hollinger is a Laker hater right?

I don't buy this.

Re: Hollinger: C's Better Without Perk
« Reply #14 on: June 16, 2010, 08:02:12 PM »

Offline footey

  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16039
  • Tommy Points: 1837
I'm surprised, pleasantly, by this POV.  Hope he is right.