There's so many things wrong with your logic here, I don't even know where to start.
I probably shouldn't but...
Let's start with the "league's agenda". Can you explain what it is? Because it seems to me that if the league has ANY agenda, it's not handing the Lakers a 2-0 series lead. Because that doesn't make them more money
And I don't think ANYONE thinks they just want the Lakers to win, just because. If you're claiming an agenda, let's hear the logic behind it. The only logical agenda would be to split the first two games to drive fan interest, advertising dollars, and box office numbers.
To your point about the conference finals schedules... you really think the timing of the games was deliberately planned, along with "criminal" officiating, to give the Celtics a disadvantage vs. the Lakers in the finals? Really? If so, why?
Do you think that Phil Jackson was commenting on the officiating to perhaps sway favor in game three?
And yeah, all those calls on Kobe were not legit
Really? Are we even talking about the same game here? Did you not witness that crime against the sport of basketball last night?
Look, I will say this: The Celtics had a really bizarre schedule this year, while the Lakers got to stay at home for the first two months. Their longest road trips were a pathetic number of games compared to ours.
Also, I do think that David Stern believes that it is in the best interest of the league if the Lakers win, because, bottom line - that's where the money is. The Celtics are a smaller market team and do not produce nearly the same revenue as the Lakers per year.
I also can't ignore perhaps the most remarkable of coincidences in that most of the conspiracy theories over the years all seem to come back to the Lakers. Remember when Stern said his dream match up in the finals would have been Lakers vs. Lakers? I kind of understood what he was saying, because it would have been the best team against the best team, but it was the wrong thing to say.
And who could forget the infamous game 6 between the Kings and Lakers. That game, and series, was stolen from the Kings - they were the true champions that year. It was the same thing in the 80s - in '88, the Pistons should have won game 6 but the refs bailed them out with a dubious foul call on Laimbeer late in the game (and yes, I hate Laimbeer, but that call was, at best, debatable). In '87 the refs got the Lakers back in Game 4 against us and let them shoot 16 more free throws than the Celtics, and in Boston no less (although K.C. Jones was more to blame for his non use of the bench, but still). In Game 6 of the finals in '85, McHale fouled out on a ridiculous call (although that series was lost for many other reasons). In '86, when the Rockets beat the Lakers in Game 5, Mitch Kupchak started a fight with Hakeem and got himself and Olajuwon thrown out of the game, which Houston still won on Sampson's last second shot, but in Game 4 of the Finals the following year, James Worthy had his shot blocked (it looked like) by DJ and was fouled hard by Greg Kite. Worthy came up swinging, and Jabbar got Kite in the face. Were either of them thrown out? No, and Dennis Johnson, of all people, was called for the foul. Those are the only ones I can think of right now.
In response to your question regarding the scheduling of the Finals, I don't think that it was set up that way on purpose, but don't you think it's at least strange that there is only one day between games 2 and 3 when the teams have to travel to Boston? It should have been 3 days off before the Finals, then a day between games 1 and 2, and 2 days between games 2 and 3 for travel and rest purposes, but I guess that's just me.
I also don't understand why David Stern, after telling NBA coaches to stop complaining about the officials, doesn't enforce his own policy and fine Phil Jackson. At least Doc is cautious about it, but Phil just seems to whine, whine, and whine, with no punishment. Although, the real problem here is that the league treats its refs like sacred cows.
IMO, Kobe, like Jordan, gets away with murder out there all the time and is never called for it. Were some of the calls questionable, sure, but so was every call made on the Celtics in Game 2.
Finally, I'm sorry that my post seemed sensationalistic to you - I really do try to look at these games objectively, but I guess after reading my previous post that would be the last conclusion one could draw from it. It was just so frustrating last night and I needed to get it out of my system.
BTW, I am a skeptical person by nature and, while there probably is no conspiracy involving the Lakers, there are certainly instances when it can feel that way - to me at least.