Author Topic: Rumor: Nets turn down deal for Beasley?  (Read 4632 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Rumor: Nets turn down deal for Beasley?
« on: June 03, 2010, 06:01:38 PM »

Offline Lucky17

  • DKC Commish
  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16021
  • Tommy Points: 2352
According to ESPN, Miami offered Beasley to the Nets in exchange for . . .

wait for it . . .

Keyon Dooling.

And the Nets turned Miami down.

http://realgm.com/src_wiretap_archives/66979/20100603/nets_turn_down_dooling_deal_for_beasley/#

I don't have ESPN Insider access, so I don't know if there's more to the story, but . . . wow.
DKC League is now on reddit!: http://www.reddit.com/r/dkcleague

Re: Rumor: Nets turn down deal for Beasley?
« Reply #1 on: June 03, 2010, 06:08:02 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
nah

Re: Rumor: Nets turn down deal for Beasley?
« Reply #2 on: June 03, 2010, 06:20:08 PM »

Offline ManUp

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8511
  • Tommy Points: 285
  • Rondo doesn't believe in easy buckets...
The Heat probably tried to trade Beasley and their pick for Dooling and the #3. I think the Nets made the right decision in turning it down. IMO, Beasley is a bust he might have the talent, but he definitely doesn't have the desire.

Re: Rumor: Nets turn down deal for Beasley?
« Reply #3 on: June 03, 2010, 06:32:15 PM »

Offline ibby

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 226
  • Tommy Points: 18
It has to be difficult going into the draft thinking that you're going to be the focal point of a rebuilding team, and then end up on an average --not awful-- Miami team that features DWade.  I'll give him 2 more years before I call him a complete bust.

 

Re: Rumor: Nets turn down deal for Beasley?
« Reply #4 on: June 03, 2010, 06:38:57 PM »

Offline MiamiCelticfan

  • The Green Kornet
  • Posts: 95
  • Tommy Points: 29
Pat riley isn't going to trade beasley unless it can land him a potential superstar. Trading him for bascially nothing would be an admission on riley's part that picking beasley was a mistake.

Re: Rumor: Nets turn down deal for Beasley?
« Reply #5 on: June 03, 2010, 06:43:59 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
Can teams even propose trades at this point?  No way does Miami do that.   We could offer them Glen Davis and the #21 and they still wouldn't part with Beasley.

Re: Rumor: Nets turn down deal for Beasley?
« Reply #6 on: June 03, 2010, 06:46:12 PM »

Offline hwangjini_1

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18194
  • Tommy Points: 2747
  • bammokja
Pat riley isn't going to trade beasley unless it can land him a potential superstar. Trading him for bascially nothing would be an admission on riley's part that picking beasley was a mistake.

which it seems it was. but i agree, why shout that out to potential trade partners.
I believe Gandhi is the only person who knew about real democracy — not democracy as the right to go and buy what you want, but democracy as the responsibility to be accountable to everyone around you. Democracy begins with freedom from hunger, freedom from unemployment, freedom from fear, and freedom from hatred.
- Vandana Shiva

Re: Rumor: Nets turn down deal for Beasley?
« Reply #7 on: June 03, 2010, 06:51:35 PM »

Offline Finkelskyhook

  • NCE
  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2892
  • Tommy Points: 285
I've seen nothing in Beasley that would make me want him as a piece on a team I'm in the process of rebuilding.

Re: Rumor: Nets turn down deal for Beasley?
« Reply #8 on: June 03, 2010, 06:52:06 PM »

Offline Lucky17

  • DKC Commish
  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16021
  • Tommy Points: 2352
Can teams even propose trades at this point?  No way does Miami do that.   We could offer them Glen Davis and the #21 and they still wouldn't part with Beasley.

Teams that aren't still playing can make trades.

Dooling's contract is non- or partially guaranteed (I forget exactly). A Beasley trade would be about clearing cap room to sign Wade's sidekick, not about the player coming back.
DKC League is now on reddit!: http://www.reddit.com/r/dkcleague

Re: Rumor: Nets turn down deal for Beasley?
« Reply #9 on: June 03, 2010, 07:05:08 PM »

Offline rjsuperfly66

  • Payton Pritchard
  • Posts: 116
  • Tommy Points: 1
Even so, 2 players can't win you a championship.  2 good players with depth can win you one tho.  Beasley was arguably the 2nd best Heat player behind Wade.  To trade him for scraps I think only hurts the team.

Re: Rumor: Nets turn down deal for Beasley?
« Reply #10 on: June 03, 2010, 07:05:25 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
Can teams even propose trades at this point?  No way does Miami do that.   We could offer them Glen Davis and the #21 and they still wouldn't part with Beasley.

Teams that aren't still playing can make trades.

Dooling's contract is non- or partially guaranteed (I forget exactly). A Beasley trade would be about clearing cap room to sign Wade's sidekick, not about the player coming back.
Ah got it... Kinda like Erick Dampier's contract?  I read his final season is entirely non-guarenteed... so a team could trade for his contract then immediately waive him and pay nothing.

Re: Rumor: Nets turn down deal for Beasley?
« Reply #11 on: June 03, 2010, 07:14:56 PM »

Offline RJ87

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11954
  • Tommy Points: 1431
  • Let's Go Celtics!
Say what you want about Beas, but I wouldn't mind having him in Boston... He's such a gifted offensive talent. I know he has work-ethic and personal issues. But I think if you take him out of the party city that is Miami Beach and on a team full of vets, he can do well.

He may never be able to be a franchise player that some thought he might, but I don't doubt he can be a 2nd or 3rd option on a good team.
2021 Houston Rockets
PG: Kyrie Irving/Patty Mills/Jalen Brunson
SG: OG Anunoby/Norman Powell/Matisse Thybulle
SF: Gordon Hayward/Demar Derozan
PF: Giannis Antetokounmpo/Robert Covington
C: Kristaps Porzingis/Bobby Portis/James Wiseman

Re: Rumor: Nets turn down deal for Beasley?
« Reply #12 on: June 03, 2010, 07:16:59 PM »

Offline Lucky17

  • DKC Commish
  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16021
  • Tommy Points: 2352
Can teams even propose trades at this point?  No way does Miami do that.   We could offer them Glen Davis and the #21 and they still wouldn't part with Beasley.

Teams that aren't still playing can make trades.

Dooling's contract is non- or partially guaranteed (I forget exactly). A Beasley trade would be about clearing cap room to sign Wade's sidekick, not about the player coming back.
Ah got it... Kinda like Erick Dampier's contract?  I read his final season is entirely non-guarenteed... so a team could trade for his contract then immediately waive him and pay nothing.

Yep, like the Dampier contract.
DKC League is now on reddit!: http://www.reddit.com/r/dkcleague

Re: Rumor: Nets turn down deal for Beasley?
« Reply #13 on: June 03, 2010, 07:20:13 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
Beasley is guaranteed $4.9  and $6.2 million over the next two years. Dooling has a non guaranteed contract for next year.

The Heat could,theoretically, have done the trade, cut Dooling thereby saving $4.4 million in cap space, and have had enough money to sign Wade another max guy and still had good cash left over to sign another significant free agent.

It was in my eyes a salary dump on Miami's part and jersey wouldn't take beasley because it would lower their space by almost $5 million since I can't see them keeping Dooling.

Re: Rumor: Nets turn down deal for Beasley?
« Reply #14 on: June 03, 2010, 07:25:39 PM »

Offline Lucky17

  • DKC Commish
  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16021
  • Tommy Points: 2352
Beasley is guaranteed $4.9  and $6.2 million over the next two years. Dooling has a non guaranteed contract for next year.

The Heat could,theoretically, have done the trade, cut Dooling thereby saving $4.4 million in cap space, and have had enough money to sign Wade another max guy and still had good cash left over to sign another significant free agent.

It was in my eyes a salary dump on Miami's part and jersey wouldn't take beasley because it would lower their space by almost $5 million since I can't see them keeping Dooling.

They won't keep Dooling. The writing is on the wall there.

Question is: does NJ think they can entice a free agent with its cap space? I tend to think the Nets would be better to use the space to take on salary via a trade.
DKC League is now on reddit!: http://www.reddit.com/r/dkcleague