2.) Rebounding - given that the Celtics as a philosophy do not crash the offensive boards on outside shots, their rebounding numbers are remarkable. They were second in post season teams in defensive rebounding percentage with a percentage that is much higher than LA's though that is offset by LA's much better offensive rebounding percentage. LA has a slightly higher overall rebounding percentage and better rebound differential but they have also played against three of the weakest defensive rebounding teams in the post season while Boston has played against three of the best. The numbers are close but LA hasn't had to face a team that matches their size yet and I think Boston wins this because they simply have been more ferocious about rebounding in the playoffs.
Another thing I like about that is if LA is crashing the offensive boards, it leaves them very exposed to Rondo pushing the offense and getting down court before their D can setup at all!
I want to point out that the Laker's playoff competition were not exactly world beaters in the rebounding department.
I mean if OKC needed Durant to grab nearly 20 rebounds in one game, what does that say about their front line? (Not that big or long).
The Jazz's front line were injured, no Okur and barely had a healthy AK47. Lakers had the heavy advantage in rebounding.
Now for the Suns, you'd think Amare would have been one of the better rebounders in the series, yet he only averaged 6 per game (6.6 in entire 2010 playoffs) in the WCF. That's not great at all.
I just think LA got lucky facing weak or injured rebounding teams.