Author Topic: The bad thing about the C's beating the Cavs  (Read 6859 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: The bad thing about the C's beating the Cavs
« Reply #15 on: May 15, 2010, 05:28:38 PM »

Offline jr_3421

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 861
  • Tommy Points: 81
I don't think anyone can blame Nate for not breaking the rotation. He came from a system that is as opposite as you can get in that it doesn't preach defense at all. If Nate had a full season under his belt, I'm sure he would be able to effectively spell Rondo at times.
"In the 4th quarter I'm whole different player"

-Paul Pierce

Re: The bad thing about the C's beating the Cavs
« Reply #16 on: May 15, 2010, 05:31:58 PM »

Offline CoachBo

  • NCE
  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6069
  • Tommy Points: 336
To be perfectly honest, it appears to me that Nate Robinson is a horrid fit for the Celtics. I'd much rather have House on the bench right now, not to mention Walker.
Coined the CelticsBlog term, "Euromistake."

Re: The bad thing about the C's beating the Cavs
« Reply #17 on: May 15, 2010, 05:42:43 PM »

Offline footey

  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16039
  • Tommy Points: 1837
Now that we know that there is, in fact, a "switch", I'll feel much better with a mediocre regular season next year.  If that's what it takes to reach the playoffs rested and healthy, no problem.

I mean, it was a tough season to watch, but right now we have a realistic shot at a title along with the #19 pick in the draft.  That's not so bad, right?

I forgot about that draft pick. Nice bonus.  I don't think we completely shut down until the last 2 months, there were legitimate chemistry issues, injuries, etc. However, there was no real drive to get best record, given that we were such a good road team (and bad home team). When it became clear early in 2010 that we would never catch the Cavs, that's when we went into coast mode.

Re: The bad thing about the C's beating the Cavs
« Reply #18 on: May 15, 2010, 05:43:02 PM »

Offline Rondo_is_better

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2821
  • Tommy Points: 495
  • R.I.P. Nate Dogg
Ideally it would be 2008 every year.
Grab a few boards, keep the TO's under 14, close out on shooters and we'll win.

Re: The bad thing about the C's beating the Cavs
« Reply #19 on: May 15, 2010, 05:43:25 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
To be perfectly honest, it appears to me that Nate Robinson is a horrid fit for the Celtics. I'd much rather have House on the bench right now, not to mention Walker.

Yeah, if we're going to miss Eddie, it will be in this series.  Who can forget him dropping 31 against the Magic last season?  Overall, he was 26-for-42 (61.9%) in last year's playoff series against the Magic, shooting 9-for-15 (60.0%) from three.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: The bad thing about the C's beating the Cavs
« Reply #20 on: May 15, 2010, 05:48:38 PM »

Offline ReggieLewis#35

  • Joe Mazzulla
  • Posts: 148
  • Tommy Points: 6
The bad thing is that your just a bandwagon jumper and havent dealt with the pain that us diehard fans have had prior to 2008,so what you can do is jump off our wagon because we love these Celtics and there fire!

Re: The bad thing about the C's beating the Cavs
« Reply #21 on: May 15, 2010, 05:49:50 PM »

Offline Toine43

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1352
  • Tommy Points: 219
  • "Spare change?"
To be perfectly honest, it appears to me that Nate Robinson is a horrid fit for the Celtics. I'd much rather have House on the bench right now, not to mention Walker.
I don't know, maybe it's just a case of Tony Allen emerging and Rondo needing to be in there for basically the full 48. There just isn't any room for Nate right now. Eddie's probably the better fit but it's not like we need either one of them at the moment. You could even argue that Finley's a better option than Eddie as a shooting specialist to play spot minutes because he's capable of occasionally creating a shot on his own, and also his height gives the Cs more defensive flexibility when he's in there than Eddie would have.

Neither Finley nor Robinson grab the attention of the defense like Eddie does - like Roy said he has the ability to come in a drop 30 in a game. But I'm pretty comfortable with the way the bench is playing right now.


Eddie House - for THREEEEEEE!

Re: The bad thing about the C's beating the Cavs
« Reply #22 on: May 15, 2010, 06:00:20 PM »

Offline Rondo_is_better

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2821
  • Tommy Points: 495
  • R.I.P. Nate Dogg
Would you guys resign Eddie House this summer? His contract is expiring.
Grab a few boards, keep the TO's under 14, close out on shooters and we'll win.

Re: The bad thing about the C's beating the Cavs
« Reply #23 on: May 15, 2010, 06:10:25 PM »

Offline GreenFaith1819

  • NCE
  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15402
  • Tommy Points: 2785
Well, my thing is that next year I see this team winning at Least the same amount of games - maybe more.

We won't see a Limping KG. We'll have as close to a healthy KG (minus his natural decrease in production due to age) - as possible. Just this fact alone makes us contenders again next year, IMO.

I really find it hard to accept that we'll have a slate of injuries and other crazy stuff happen next year - like Glen's unfortunate thing that kept him out of the lineup for the first portion of the season.

I just think that the only thing slowing this team down next year is Age - but even with that it is not so bad.

Just let Rondo continue to do his thing. The young Man is not perfect, but he is Ready.

Plus - the NBA Landscape is fixing to change, Big Time. ATL won't be the same next year....ORL could change somewhat depending on the what happens with this series. MIA, TOR, and CLE will see some sort of change.

And Kobe will be a Year Older - Slower, too.

All of these uncertainties will play into the Celtic's favor, I think. No matter where Bosh, Wade or Lebron end up, they won't be instant contenders.

Even Boston may see change - depending upon how we compete up until Feb 2011. But IMO I think we'll keep our same core, as in our starting 5, at least. We need to get younger, though, and I'll leave that to Danny.

But for the most part, I'm just enjoying the ride so far. And the thought of sending Both ORL and LA (Especially LA) home, Unhappy Again - makes me Happy.

Re: The bad thing about the C's beating the Cavs
« Reply #24 on: May 15, 2010, 06:21:34 PM »

Offline OriginalODb

  • Sam Hauser
  • Posts: 171
  • Tommy Points: 31
The bad thing is that your just a bandwagon jumper and haven't dealt with the pain that us diehard fans have had prior to 2008,so what you can do is jump off our wagon because we love these Celtics and there fire!

thanks for the snap judgment, I never said it was a negative that we beat the Cavs, Out of the tons of great things/feelings that come up from beating the Cavs and moving on, I thought my original point could be the one negative. I'm pessimistic by nature and it crossed my mind this morning. I thought it was an interesting thing to bring up while we are waiting for the series to begin.

BTW it would be "we love these Celtics and their fire"

Re: The bad thing about the C's beating the Cavs
« Reply #25 on: May 15, 2010, 06:32:06 PM »

Offline GreenFaith1819

  • NCE
  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15402
  • Tommy Points: 2785
The bad thing is that your just a bandwagon jumper and haven't dealt with the pain that us diehard fans have had prior to 2008,so what you can do is jump off our wagon because we love these Celtics and there fire!

thanks for the snap judgment, I never said it was a negative that we beat the Cavs, Out of the tons of great things/feelings that come up from beating the Cavs and moving on, I thought my original point could be the one negative. I'm pessimistic by nature and it crossed my mind this morning. I thought it was an interesting thing to bring up while we are waiting for the series to begin.

BTW it would be "we love these Celtics and their fire"

C'mon now People..let's enjoy this thing for what it is. No need to label folks as Bandwagoners or whatever.

Heck I was a Bandwagoner, waaaayyy back in 1981. I was intrigued by this once young man named Larry Bird back then...

Re: The bad thing about the C's beating the Cavs
« Reply #26 on: May 15, 2010, 06:33:22 PM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19020
  • Tommy Points: 1834
As I said before, love House, but glad we moved away from him and actually gave Tony the opportunity he's currently given, which I prefer to an undersized 2nd unit. With House here that wouldn't have happened.

Of all our possibilities heading to the the playoffs, I wouldn't change this current 8 man rotation.

Re: The bad thing about the C's beating the Cavs
« Reply #27 on: May 15, 2010, 07:27:23 PM »

Offline Andy Jick

  • Al Horford
  • ***
  • Posts: 3795
  • Tommy Points: 89
  • You know my methods, Watson.
The bad thing about the C's beating the Cavs...

...more ridiculous threads like this one.

Can't we just let next season wait?
"It was easier to know it than to explain why I know it."

Re: The bad thing about the C's beating the Cavs
« Reply #28 on: May 15, 2010, 07:37:34 PM »

Offline cdif911

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4868
  • Tommy Points: 43
the only bad thing about the Celtics moving on is I've got at least another 2 weeks of late nights watching games, but I think the being a little sleepy for my 7:30 class is worth it =)
When you love life, life loves you right back


Re: The bad thing about the C's beating the Cavs
« Reply #29 on: May 15, 2010, 08:03:31 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32935
  • Tommy Points: 846
  • Larry Bird for President
there is no bad thing beating the cavs.