Yeah, all the experts are focusing on the fact that the Magic have bulldozed their way through the playoffs so far, and aren't giving us a chance. If you look at matchups, our play against Orlando during the "big three" era, etc., though, you'll see that we match up very well with the Magic. Those eight playoff wins don't mean anything.
They mean as much as our 8 wins, a trip to the ECF.
Indeed, they mean as much, but the "experts" are making it sound like the fact that Orlando swept the two previous teams show how good they are. It's just not an argument, it shows that they are playing well but the Hawks/Magic series was an aberration (the Hawks matched up so poorly against Orlando it wasn't even fair, I mean, it's like you would have put Boston against the Knicks in the playoffs...).
As for the Charlotte series, they swept them but every game was close and the Bobcats didn't have a lot of offensive talent nor experience (but had a great coach) so it doesn't say much when you see how much more talented the Celtics are.
I just find it ridiculous when the media are making their picks based on previous records or previous rounds instead of looking at the matchup. Last year I was amazed they all picked the Cavs to win against Orlando, yet I had looked at the season series and the matchups and I knew Cleveland was in trouble. Yet if you are the defending ECF champion or if you swept two weak teams you're given a ticket to the Finals... stupid logic.
Although the experts picks make me smile again, I'm not that shocked this time. I think the Magic has proven that they have the mental edge needed in the playoffs and they are so talented offensively that I realistically see them winning in 6 or 7 games. It's the most "logical" pick I think, although I still see the C's prevailing of course.