Author Topic: Van Gundy Giving C's Credit  (Read 1433 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Van Gundy Giving C's Credit
« on: May 14, 2010, 08:38:24 PM »

Offline Ubah543

  • Anton Watson
  • Posts: 4
  • Tommy Points: 1
I don't know if this has been posted yet but it's nice to see someone realizing how good the Celtics are and giving them their due.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=5189924

Wow, who would have guessed? SVG is giving us credit for beating Cavs
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2010, 02:46:04 AM »

Offline Mizzy21390

  • Kristaps Porzingis
  • Posts: 186
  • Tommy Points: 16
I still don't like the man, but I am so happy someone finally broke the silence and said something about how the attention has been on the Cavs losing and not on the Celtics winning.

He is correct that people just can't fathom that LBJ and the Cavs lost, and that this win by the Celtics should not be considered an upset. And he is correct...

Here's the article by Nick Friedell:

Quote
MAITLAND, Fla. -- Orlando Magic  head coach Stan Van Gundy can't understand why so many people are so surprised that the Boston Celtics  knocked off the Cleveland Cavaliers in the Eastern Conference semifinals.

"I think it's because of the whole LeBron James thing that there's a lot of people in the media that can't fathom him getting beaten," Van Gundy said after the Magic's practice on Friday afternoon. "I mean that.

"I just think there's a lot of people that [think], 'Oh, if you've got LeBron James you're going to win every night,' and no matter who else is on the other team it's a major upset. Call it an upset if you want, but Boston's pretty [dang] good.

"Now everybody goes into 'What's wrong with Cleveland mode,' instead of, we can never in sports just look and say, 'You know what? That team's pretty good.'"

Van Gundy wants people to give credit to the Celtics for simply outplaying James and the Cavaliers throughout the series.

"All I'm saying is that Cleveland did have the best record, but Boston struggled through the year with injuries and especially [Kevin] Garnett and [Paul] Pierce not being healthy," he said. "When they're healthy, which they are, I don't know why people would be [surprised].

"Some people are calling it a major upset. They want to call it an upset. I don't know how a team that's essentially the same two years removed from winning a championship, and is healthy, pulls a major upset."

The outspoken Magic head coach even expressed a little sympathy for James for all the scrutiny that he has dealt with over the last few days.

"I feel bad for him only in that, when you've taken a team like that and basically because of one guy [the expectation is] they're going to win a championship," Van Gundy said. "Then, instead of just going, 'Wow, the Celtics are good and they played great,' now it's, 'What's wrong with LeBron? Why didn't he play the way he did in Game 5? The talent around him is not good enough. Mike Brown can't coach.'

"You go through all the negatives ... [the media] can't just say, I can, but I guess you guys can't just say they lost to a [dang] good team."

As for the speculation that Brown might out of job soon, Van Gundy used the word 'scapegoat.'

"Mike Brown's one of the most successful coaches that there's been in this league for a long time," he said. "But it becomes scapegoat time and you're not going to see many people other than coaches stepping up and taking the responsibility. The players are absolved. It's sad, but it's the way it goes. None of it is surprising.

"Mike's been in a very difficult situation, again because the media created the expectations that that was a team that couldn't lose, and so when they did, he pays the price. Instead of people maybe just saying, 'The media was wrong." ... the inevitability of it. The 'Win a ring for the king,' and everything, it just made it inevitable that if it didn't go well, Mike would be the one to pay the price. I don't know if that's fair, but that's the way it is, that's business."

As for the business of where James may end up next, Van Gundy wasn't sure where the reigning MVP would be playing next season.

"I don't know LeBron well enough to have any idea where he'll end up," he said. "My guess would be Cleveland because as I understand it, [there's] around a $20 million difference if somebody goes elsewhere or signs where they are. I don't care how much money you have, that's a lot of money."
Yeeeaaaa!!!

Offline FallGuy

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1941
  • Tommy Points: 70
To give credit where it's due, both Scott Van Pelt and Ric Bucher were VERY fired up about how the story was LBJ instead of Boston's resurgence. Bucher was as animated as I've ever seen him. They both went out of their way to heap praise on the Celtics, before any considerations for the Lebron soap opera. So that's both SVG and SVP (Van Gundy and Van Pelt) and Bucher. Oh, and also JE Skeets on The Basketball Jones podcast who's been pretty impressed by Boston's work.

Edit - to fix stupid spelling error.
« Last Edit: May 15, 2010, 05:37:29 AM by FallGuy »

Offline Bahku

  • CB HOF Editor
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19771
  • Tommy Points: 3632
  • Oe ma krr pamtseotu
Great article ... thanks, Mizzy. While the Van Gundy's are certainly outspoken, they at least speak what they feel is the truth. I've really already had enough of the media's fixation on LeBron's upset, and the lack of credit being given to the Celtics for just plain out-playing the Cavaliers. (TP)
2010 PAPOUG, 2012 & 2017 PAPTYG CHAMP, HD BOT

* BAHKU MUSIC *