Sorry Nick...technically I still disagree with you.....when you say "my belief that they were good enough to win it all disappeared".....to me that is quitting/surrendering.....
Quitting doesn't you make a bad fan, a bad person...or a non-Celtic (It actually makes you human).....I do think it makes you POSSIBLY someone who maybe gives up too easily??? or doesn't enjoy fighting until the end. Who knows. Thus the analogy of a foxhole and the word surrender is what this means to me in context of the Celtics 2009-2010 journey .
There is nothing wrong with saying "wow this looks dark but we have to keep fighting until the final bell.....What you are saying however is akin to a poker player seeing a very short stack of chips left in a poker game and realizing you are up against other players with large stacks of chips.....your odds to win are very low and you turn around and say "Ok I quit ....here are the rest of my chips because I can't win" You have to a some sliver of a belief that you can double up your chips a number of times and just keep plugging.
We are splitting hairs here I know.....but I think there are a lot people now who "gave up" at some point earlier and are now trying to make themselves feel better by saying something less than what Rida just said. Hat tip to Rida for saying it and owning his "giving up" like a person who can admit mistakes.....nice job Rida
Now this is just a Celticsblog site, and this is just about basketball so we can't take any of this too serious ( I mean no harm in my joke).....but in real life I always gravitate towards people who either just keep fighting..... or people who make a mistake and simply say "Wow I was totally wrong.... or say "I gave up too easily" We are all guilty of these things at some point in life of doing this....just own up to it and hopefully learn from it. I hope I have.
You're right. We will have to agree to disagree because this is basketball after all and we are talking about following a team not fighting for business, money, honor or a life here. People who quit in those things, I agree I avoid them like the plague.
But to come to analyze a team and come to a decision that they just aren't good enough to win it all is not quitting in your heart and soul. To me they are two completely different things.
In one you are using your brain to come to an analytical decision based on observation and stats, etc. In the other you are making a decision with your heart and emotion and soul.
I never gave up on the 1996-2007 Boston Celtics. never quit on them even once. But I knew in my mind do to an analytical decision that they weren't food enough to win the championship. I watched every game during that time. Went to hundreds. Lost my voice more times than I can count cheering them on. Bought uncounted hats, shirts and stuff. read the Globe and scanned the internet looking for Celtic news like a maniac.
Never once thought for a minute in all that time they were good enough to win a title.
Sorry, but coming to a decision in the middle of a season that your team isn't good enough to win it all isn't quitting. It's not even close.
And I think saying so only causes more divisiveness in the fandom. When things weren't going well and the "negative crowd" was calling me a blind optimist in the game threads(that did happen) I didn't agree with that or like it. And now that things are looking rosy again, I don't think it's any different to for those "positive" fans to call people who believed the team couldn't win it all "quitters". I don't agree with that and don't like it.
I NEVER quit on this team. NEVER!! NOT ONCE!!!
Maybe a different definition of quitting but I still find the accusation and term distasteful.
Again, I guess we will just have to agree to disagree.
Also, don't worry, if the C's lose to the Cavs or Magic or Suns or Lakers, you won't find me starting a thread saying "see, I knew they couldn't win it all".