4. The household names- Really lets be honest, the name garnett, allen, pierce is known in almost every New England home now.....5 years ago most people couldnt name 3 people on the celtics. unless you were a real fan of the team. These names got people into the stadium, sold the tickets and left those real fans on the outside looking in. So from a fans perspective the big 3 trading could be the worst thing for them, whereas if the team drafted young talent, signed a few key guys and slowly worked their way up into relevance as they did in those early 00's playoff series, then the place would be like it was there because the right people were there.
If someone who went to the game to get drunk or only socialize went cause the Big 3 were there, I question their mental states. They just went cause the Celtics got good. It would be the same even if they had "homegrown" talent and got Banner 17 that way, especially assuming Durant probably woulda been on the team. I mean, everyone else in here says the 07-08 crowds were the best. That's probably because everyone was hungry for a ring, real fans and "bandwagoners" alike. Now, the bandwagoner pool has probably increased to the point that the real fans are being put up on the balcony, maybe.
I agree. Its all about winning. Boston is a frontrunning town, and when its teams do well, it becomes a social event. It has nothing to do with the "names", it has to do with the fact that the team is relevant because they are good.
And personally, I would much rather have to deal with some casual fans than losing.
And lets also remember, the reason they have all of these things like the dancers, and jumbotron entertainment is because people stopped showing up when they were losing, so they needed to find a way to fill the place back up. And casual fans love that stuff. And honestly, I can't complain about it too much, because it keeps my fiance happy when she goes with me.