Will Bynum has 20 assists in a game

[rondo987]

We should go after him

http://www.realgm.com/src_wiretap_archives/65330/20100313/bynum_has_20_assists_in_detroits_win/

[PosImpos]

I like Will Bynum a lot but he cant shoot, meaning he'd never be able to play alongside Rondo. 

[Cman]

Danny never should've let him go!

[P2]

Nate >>> Bynum.

[MetroGlobe]

I like Will Bynum a lot but he cant shoot, meaning he'd never be able to play alongside Rondo. 

Whadda you mean play alongside Rondo?  The guy is barely 6' tall.  He's clearly a PG and would never be in the lineup with Rondo.  Invalid argument is invalid.

I agree with the other poster who said Nate is better.  However if we cannot keep Nate for whatever reason, Bynum is a really decent backup PG.  Whether or not he can play with Rondo is irrelevant.

[rondo987]

I just want to clarify something. There is some sort inside joke with some of the posters in this forum about Will Bynum. I do not know what the joke is, but I always see posts about Will Bynum and how we should have never let him go. So when I saw this headline I figured I would post it, mostly for amusement purposes.

[Change]

I just want to clarify something. There is some sort inside joke with some of the posters in this forum about Will Bynum. I do not know what the joke is, but I always see posts about Will Bynum and how we should have never let him go. So when I saw this headline I figured I would post it, mostly for amusement purposes.

You mean Will Solomon. The greatest Celtic who never wore green.

[rondo987]

Ohh was it Will Solomon? Sorry I guess I got the Will's mixed up. Anyways what's the deal with that anyway?

I just want to clarify something. There is some sort inside joke with some of the posters in this forum about Will Bynum. I do not know what the joke is, but I always see posts about Will Bynum and how we should have never let him go. So when I saw this headline I figured I would post it, mostly for amusement purposes.

You mean Will Solomon. The greatest Celtic who never wore green.

[RebusRankin]

If we had only kept Will Solomon, we'd be looking at a three peat and we would not have lost a game in two years.

[TradeProposalDude]

We actually did have Will Bynum. I think it was the 04-05 season. But he got cut in the preseason. He did see some action.

Bynum was actually a part of that bar fight involving Tony Allen and the victim whose eye socket was broken. Allen and Bynum go back a long time from their days growing up in Chicago.

Bynum has emerged into quite an NBA player.

[cdif911]

Will Solomon is the overlord of Will Bynum and controls his every movement, therefore the 20 assists can be credited to Will Solomon

[PosImpos]

I like Will Bynum a lot but he cant shoot, meaning he'd never be able to play alongside Rondo. 

Whadda you mean play alongside Rondo?  The guy is barely 6' tall.  He's clearly a PG and would never be in the lineup with Rondo.  Invalid argument is invalid.

I agree with the other poster who said Nate is better.  However if we cannot keep Nate for whatever reason, Bynum is a really decent backup PG.  Whether or not he can play with Rondo is irrelevant.

Fail post is fail. 

Here's why the argument is relevant.  Rondo plays 36-40 minutes a game, meaning our backup point guard will only play more than 8-10 minutes a game if he can play alongside Rondo.

No point in paying Will Bynum to play 8-10 minutes a game for us.  Indeed, as evidence by his 20 assist game, Will Bynum is far too talented to be happy with a small role like that.

Does that make sense?