0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
How the drafting of Darko Milicic didn't cost Joe Dumars his job is still one of the great mysteries in the NBA over the last ten yearsOf course, five years from now the same might be being said about signing Ben Gordon and Charlie Villanueva
Quote from: hpantazo on March 05, 2010, 01:02:30 PMQuote from: Lucky17 on March 05, 2010, 12:54:56 PMQuote from: hpantazo on March 05, 2010, 12:50:59 PMI think Dumars killed this guy's NBA career by taking him at #2 over Melo, DWade, and Bosh. Heck, the same Dumars went on to trade Billups so that he could clear cap space to sign Ben Gordon and Villanueva, and he was executive of the year? Anyway, I think Darko can be a solid player in a good program (like the celtics) but will never be good enough to make himself happy by living up to his own expectations. Let him go back to europe.This is the second (Thabeet) recent post I've seen where a GM has been blamed for ruining a player's career for drafting him too high.I don't understand that logic. If anyone killed Darko's career, it was Larry Brown.at a young age, when you come in knowing you need to work your tail off to improve your game and earn a place in the league, you come in with the mindset needed to succeed. If you come in as the #2 pick and you were totally hyped in your home country, you come in thinking that the team owes you shots, playing time, etc. and you are a gift to them, you come in with the mindset to fail. Simple as that. Very few guys chosen in the top 5 are actually good enough to live up to the hype, but very few are bad enough to get crushed by expectations, and Darko is one of them. So, even though Darko lacked the requisite work ethic and drive to live up to the expectations of being #2, he'd not have been a bust had he been picked 10 slots lower?
Quote from: Lucky17 on March 05, 2010, 12:54:56 PMQuote from: hpantazo on March 05, 2010, 12:50:59 PMI think Dumars killed this guy's NBA career by taking him at #2 over Melo, DWade, and Bosh. Heck, the same Dumars went on to trade Billups so that he could clear cap space to sign Ben Gordon and Villanueva, and he was executive of the year? Anyway, I think Darko can be a solid player in a good program (like the celtics) but will never be good enough to make himself happy by living up to his own expectations. Let him go back to europe.This is the second (Thabeet) recent post I've seen where a GM has been blamed for ruining a player's career for drafting him too high.I don't understand that logic. If anyone killed Darko's career, it was Larry Brown.at a young age, when you come in knowing you need to work your tail off to improve your game and earn a place in the league, you come in with the mindset needed to succeed. If you come in as the #2 pick and you were totally hyped in your home country, you come in thinking that the team owes you shots, playing time, etc. and you are a gift to them, you come in with the mindset to fail. Simple as that. Very few guys chosen in the top 5 are actually good enough to live up to the hype, but very few are bad enough to get crushed by expectations, and Darko is one of them.
Quote from: hpantazo on March 05, 2010, 12:50:59 PMI think Dumars killed this guy's NBA career by taking him at #2 over Melo, DWade, and Bosh. Heck, the same Dumars went on to trade Billups so that he could clear cap space to sign Ben Gordon and Villanueva, and he was executive of the year? Anyway, I think Darko can be a solid player in a good program (like the celtics) but will never be good enough to make himself happy by living up to his own expectations. Let him go back to europe.This is the second (Thabeet) recent post I've seen where a GM has been blamed for ruining a player's career for drafting him too high.I don't understand that logic. If anyone killed Darko's career, it was Larry Brown.
I think Dumars killed this guy's NBA career by taking him at #2 over Melo, DWade, and Bosh. Heck, the same Dumars went on to trade Billups so that he could clear cap space to sign Ben Gordon and Villanueva, and he was executive of the year? Anyway, I think Darko can be a solid player in a good program (like the celtics) but will never be good enough to make himself happy by living up to his own expectations. Let him go back to europe.
Quote from: Lucky17 on March 05, 2010, 01:06:02 PMQuote from: hpantazo on March 05, 2010, 01:02:30 PMQuote from: Lucky17 on March 05, 2010, 12:54:56 PMQuote from: hpantazo on March 05, 2010, 12:50:59 PMI think Dumars killed this guy's NBA career by taking him at #2 over Melo, DWade, and Bosh. Heck, the same Dumars went on to trade Billups so that he could clear cap space to sign Ben Gordon and Villanueva, and he was executive of the year? Anyway, I think Darko can be a solid player in a good program (like the celtics) but will never be good enough to make himself happy by living up to his own expectations. Let him go back to europe.This is the second (Thabeet) recent post I've seen where a GM has been blamed for ruining a player's career for drafting him too high.I don't understand that logic. If anyone killed Darko's career, it was Larry Brown.at a young age, when you come in knowing you need to work your tail off to improve your game and earn a place in the league, you come in with the mindset needed to succeed. If you come in as the #2 pick and you were totally hyped in your home country, you come in thinking that the team owes you shots, playing time, etc. and you are a gift to them, you come in with the mindset to fail. Simple as that. Very few guys chosen in the top 5 are actually good enough to live up to the hype, but very few are bad enough to get crushed by expectations, and Darko is one of them. So, even though Darko lacked the requisite work ethic and drive to live up to the expectations of being #2, he'd not have been a bust had he been picked 10 slots lower?I think if he came in 12-25 he would have had a better mentality and work ethic and therefore would have become a better player and lived up to his potential, but who knows?
Quote from: hpantazo on March 05, 2010, 01:14:41 PMQuote from: Lucky17 on March 05, 2010, 01:06:02 PMQuote from: hpantazo on March 05, 2010, 01:02:30 PMQuote from: Lucky17 on March 05, 2010, 12:54:56 PMQuote from: hpantazo on March 05, 2010, 12:50:59 PMI think Dumars killed this guy's NBA career by taking him at #2 over Melo, DWade, and Bosh. Heck, the same Dumars went on to trade Billups so that he could clear cap space to sign Ben Gordon and Villanueva, and he was executive of the year? Anyway, I think Darko can be a solid player in a good program (like the celtics) but will never be good enough to make himself happy by living up to his own expectations. Let him go back to europe.This is the second (Thabeet) recent post I've seen where a GM has been blamed for ruining a player's career for drafting him too high.I don't understand that logic. If anyone killed Darko's career, it was Larry Brown.at a young age, when you come in knowing you need to work your tail off to improve your game and earn a place in the league, you come in with the mindset needed to succeed. If you come in as the #2 pick and you were totally hyped in your home country, you come in thinking that the team owes you shots, playing time, etc. and you are a gift to them, you come in with the mindset to fail. Simple as that. Very few guys chosen in the top 5 are actually good enough to live up to the hype, but very few are bad enough to get crushed by expectations, and Darko is one of them. So, even though Darko lacked the requisite work ethic and drive to live up to the expectations of being #2, he'd not have been a bust had he been picked 10 slots lower?I think if he came in 12-25 he would have had a better mentality and work ethic and therefore would have become a better player and lived up to his potential, but who knows? Yeah, I hear you. He was probably as much a victim of the hype around him as Dumars was.Although, you would think that getting bounced around the league like a beach ball at a Dead concert might tip you off that you're doing something wrong, wouldn't you?
Well I think eating a hamburger before a game isn't the worst thing he could do. I kind of like the guy now. MMM hamburgers
Quote from: celticsclay on March 05, 2010, 01:30:36 PMWell I think eating a hamburger before a game isn't the worst thing he could do. I kind of like the guy now. MMM hamburgersI have to admit, reading that he ate hamburgers before the games was enough to get me to eat one today!
Quote from: hpantazo on March 05, 2010, 01:32:01 PMQuote from: celticsclay on March 05, 2010, 01:30:36 PMWell I think eating a hamburger before a game isn't the worst thing he could do. I kind of like the guy now. MMM hamburgersI have to admit, reading that he ate hamburgers before the games was enough to get me to eat one today!what kinds of toppings are we talking about? I had one with swiss and onions last night. It was pretty epic. Should this become the official hamburger thread?
Quote from: celticsclay on March 05, 2010, 01:41:55 PMQuote from: hpantazo on March 05, 2010, 01:32:01 PMQuote from: celticsclay on March 05, 2010, 01:30:36 PMWell I think eating a hamburger before a game isn't the worst thing he could do. I kind of like the guy now. MMM hamburgersI have to admit, reading that he ate hamburgers before the games was enough to get me to eat one today!what kinds of toppings are we talking about? I had one with swiss and onions last night. It was pretty epic. Should this become the official hamburger thread?I had a real talking to from a chef friend of mine not long ago. Basically he said a hamburger is not defined by how well you cook it, or the quality of the buns, or the toppings, but the hamburger is defined first and foremost by the quality of meat. I'm currently looking into finding some high quality locally raised grass fed beef. You know, the real dank stuff.
Quote from: IndeedProceed on March 05, 2010, 02:04:12 PMQuote from: celticsclay on March 05, 2010, 01:41:55 PMQuote from: hpantazo on March 05, 2010, 01:32:01 PMQuote from: celticsclay on March 05, 2010, 01:30:36 PMWell I think eating a hamburger before a game isn't the worst thing he could do. I kind of like the guy now. MMM hamburgersI have to admit, reading that he ate hamburgers before the games was enough to get me to eat one today!what kinds of toppings are we talking about? I had one with swiss and onions last night. It was pretty epic. Should this become the official hamburger thread?I had a real talking to from a chef friend of mine not long ago. Basically he said a hamburger is not defined by how well you cook it, or the quality of the buns, or the toppings, but the hamburger is defined first and foremost by the quality of meat. I'm currently looking into finding some high quality locally raised grass fed beef. You know, the real dank stuff. Yeah thats what the blond haired chef that does the TGI Fridays commercials says too.
Quote from: moiso on March 05, 2010, 02:14:03 PMQuote from: IndeedProceed on March 05, 2010, 02:04:12 PMQuote from: celticsclay on March 05, 2010, 01:41:55 PMQuote from: hpantazo on March 05, 2010, 01:32:01 PMQuote from: celticsclay on March 05, 2010, 01:30:36 PMWell I think eating a hamburger before a game isn't the worst thing he could do. I kind of like the guy now. MMM hamburgersI have to admit, reading that he ate hamburgers before the games was enough to get me to eat one today!what kinds of toppings are we talking about? I had one with swiss and onions last night. It was pretty epic. Should this become the official hamburger thread?I had a real talking to from a chef friend of mine not long ago. Basically he said a hamburger is not defined by how well you cook it, or the quality of the buns, or the toppings, but the hamburger is defined first and foremost by the quality of meat. I'm currently looking into finding some high quality locally raised grass fed beef. You know, the real dank stuff. Yeah thats what the blond haired chef that does the TGI Fridays commercials says too.You mean that weirdo with the spikey hair and annoying voice? I don't trust anyone that does TGI Fridays commercials.