Author Topic: Celtics (36-21) at Pistons (21-38) 3/2  (Read 62080 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (36-21) at Pistons (21-38) 3/2
« Reply #90 on: March 02, 2010, 08:47:23 PM »

Offline Bahku

  • CB HOF Editor
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19771
  • Tommy Points: 3632
  • Oe ma krr pamtseotu
Jerebko can NOT handle KG.
2010 PAPOUG, 2012 & 2017 PAPTYG CHAMP, HD BOT

* BAHKU MUSIC *

Re: Celtics (36-21) at Pistons (21-38) 3/2
« Reply #91 on: March 02, 2010, 08:47:42 PM »

Offline Thruthelookingglass

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2687
  • Tommy Points: 133
Pierce isn't trying defensively.  I thought they were getting a boost with him coming back.....

I think he came back a game or two earlier than he should have.

That's pretty routine -- I don't think he ever lets himself really get healthy, only "healthy enough."

I agree and there really isn't any bonafide need to rush him back.

Re: Celtics (36-21) at Pistons (21-38) 3/2
« Reply #92 on: March 02, 2010, 08:48:36 PM »

Offline liam

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 45920
  • Tommy Points: 3340
Can we have ONE game where the refs don't COMPLETELY SUCK?


Detroit getting away with all kinds of contact---We brush against someone--FOUL on the C's-!
Refs aren't the problem. Intensity and focus are....yet again....

No, the refs aren't the problem....Huh?...Pierce gets CLEARLY Fouled by Daye while shooting with this foot on the 3 point line---NO "and one" for him...Pierce takes a swipe and misses on Daye's dunk--FOUL----AND ONE-!

KG and Big Baby get fouled on their shot attempts...NO CALLS.

I see it too. I don't understand it but we are getting hosed by the Refs all year.

Re: Celtics (36-21) at Pistons (21-38) 3/2
« Reply #93 on: March 02, 2010, 08:48:43 PM »

Offline Kuberski33

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7377
  • Tommy Points: 570
6 minutes of sustained defensive intensity to start the 3rd quarter would end this game....think the Celtics have it in them?


Re: Celtics (36-21) at Pistons (21-38) 3/2
« Reply #94 on: March 02, 2010, 08:49:19 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52857
  • Tommy Points: 2569
I'd like to see Scal in the game alongside the other starters minus Rasheed Wallace. Get some shooting in there and let Rondo run the show with his playmaking ability.

Re: Celtics (36-21) at Pistons (21-38) 3/2
« Reply #95 on: March 02, 2010, 08:49:57 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52857
  • Tommy Points: 2569
Nice 8-2 run to end the half and get back the lead in the process.

Re: Celtics (36-21) at Pistons (21-38) 3/2
« Reply #96 on: March 02, 2010, 08:51:11 PM »

Offline Change

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6666
  • Tommy Points: 544
Can we have ONE game where the refs don't COMPLETELY SUCK?


Detroit getting away with all kinds of contact---We brush against someone--FOUL on the C's-!
Refs aren't the problem. Intensity and focus are....yet again....

No, the refs aren't the problem....Huh?...Pierce gets CLEARLY Fouled by Daye while shooting with this foot on the 3 point line---NO "and one" for him...Pierce takes a swipe and misses on Daye's dunk--FOUL----AND ONE-!

KG and Big Baby get fouled on their shot attempts...NO CALLS.

I see it too. I don't understand it but we are getting hosed by the Refs all year.

Official hate Sheed. Sheed is a Celtic. So Officials hate Celtics.


Re: Celtics (36-21) at Pistons (21-38) 3/2
« Reply #97 on: March 02, 2010, 08:51:49 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52857
  • Tommy Points: 2569
Sheed + Davis + Shelden = Below par big men
Pierce + Ray + Marquis + TA = mediocre wings
Rondo = dominant player but middling play so far
Garnett = dominant player, playing well, but benched by his own coach

Result = a mediocre team

Re: Celtics (36-21) at Pistons (21-38) 3/2
« Reply #98 on: March 02, 2010, 08:52:03 PM »

Offline Bahku

  • CB HOF Editor
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19771
  • Tommy Points: 3632
  • Oe ma krr pamtseotu
Can we have ONE game where the refs don't COMPLETELY SUCK?


Detroit getting away with all kinds of contact---We brush against someone--FOUL on the C's-!
Refs aren't the problem. Intensity and focus are....yet again....

No, the refs aren't the problem....Huh?...Pierce gets CLEARLY Fouled by Daye while shooting with this foot on the 3 point line---NO "and one" for him...Pierce takes a swipe and misses on Daye's dunk--FOUL----AND ONE-!

KG and Big Baby get fouled on their shot attempts...NO CALLS.

I see it too. I don't understand it but we are getting hosed by the Refs all year.

Yup ... a TON of "no-calls" so far, but I've come to expect it ... the Celts just have not and WILL not get the respect from the officials that they deserve.
2010 PAPOUG, 2012 & 2017 PAPTYG CHAMP, HD BOT

* BAHKU MUSIC *

Re: Celtics (36-21) at Pistons (21-38) 3/2
« Reply #99 on: March 02, 2010, 08:53:53 PM »

Offline lon3lytoaster

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4608
  • Tommy Points: 157
  • Word aapp!
I want some Nate Robinson. He only played 5 minutes in the first half. I don't get it.  ???

2-2 with five points.

Re: Celtics (36-21) at Pistons (21-38) 3/2
« Reply #100 on: March 02, 2010, 08:54:16 PM »

Offline Kuberski33

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7377
  • Tommy Points: 570
You don't get respect from the refs unless you put the effort in defensively. They are getting outworked, yet again.

Re: Celtics (36-21) at Pistons (21-38) 3/2
« Reply #101 on: March 02, 2010, 08:54:38 PM »

Online snively

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5918
  • Tommy Points: 500
Sheed + Davis + Shelden = Below par big men
Pierce + Ray + Marquis + TA = mediocre wings
Rondo = dominant player but middling play so far
Garnett = dominant player, playing well, but benched by his own coach

Result = a mediocre team

You really think Pierce is a mediocre wing?  If he gets healthy, I think he's a very good wing.

The rest is spot on.

What do you think of Nate?

2025 Draft: Chicago Bulls

PG: Chauncey Billups
SG: Kobe Bryant
SF: Jimmy Butler
PF: Pau Gasol
C: Yao Ming

Re: Celtics (36-21) at Pistons (21-38) 3/2
« Reply #102 on: March 02, 2010, 08:58:01 PM »

Offline More Banners

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3845
  • Tommy Points: 257
Sheed + Davis + Shelden = Below par big men
Pierce + Ray + Marquis + TA = mediocre wings
Rondo = dominant player but middling play so far
Garnett = dominant player, playing well, but benched by his own coach

Result = a mediocre team

You really think Pierce is a mediocre wing?  If he gets healthy, I think he's a very good wing.

The rest is spot on.

What do you think of Nate?



Gotta prove it on the court.  PP sure isn't much more than average/mediocre today.  If/when he's healthy, he will still have to prove it then.

This team seems to want to rest on past success far too much for my liking.

Re: Celtics (36-21) at Pistons (21-38) 3/2
« Reply #103 on: March 02, 2010, 08:58:12 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52857
  • Tommy Points: 2569
Sheed + Davis + Shelden = Below par big men
Pierce + Ray + Marquis + TA = mediocre wings
Rondo = dominant player but middling play so far
Garnett = dominant player, playing well, but benched by his own coach

Result = a mediocre team

You really think Pierce is a mediocre wing?  If he gets healthy, I think he's a very good wing.

Tonight only = Pierce doesn't look right. Looks mediocre.

Pierce is still an All-Star when healthy.

It's been a very long time since he was healthy for a sustained period of time though.

Re: Celtics (36-21) at Pistons (21-38) 3/2
« Reply #104 on: March 02, 2010, 08:58:32 PM »

Online Neurotic Guy

  • Tommy Heinsohn
  • *************************
  • Posts: 25562
  • Tommy Points: 2720
I'd really like to see this team turn on the defensive intensity and sustain it.  I realize folks are saying we are lacking energy and intensity, but that rationale doesn't hold for me. I think the C's are putting in effort and then not seeing the results they used to see.  This leads to slowing down a step -- a depressive response.  The question I have is, does this team have the legs to sustain a strong defensive effort.  Is it age or injury or effort?  Or all of the above.  I keep expecting to see them show signs of defensive greatness. I don't give up easily -- I am hoping to see it in the second half.