You know, I'm shocked Shelden can't catch the ball with how long he's been in the league.
Anyways: 1st column's offensive rebounds, 2nd column's defensive rebounds, third column's total rebounds.
BBD: 2.1 2.0 4.1
Shelden: 0.9 2.3 3.2
This myth that Shelden can rebound better than BBD is kinda silly.
I'm not sure it's a "myth" or the argument is "silly". I mean, how can you just look at the raw numbers of players who play unequal minutes, and come to a conclusion?
Rebounds per 36 minute:
BBD: 4.5 off, 4.2 def, 8.7 total
SW: 2.8 off, 6.8 def, 9.6 total
Rebound rate:
BBD: 16.0% off, 13.9% def, 14.9% total
SW: 10.0% off, 22.2% def, 16.4% total
Link
Based upon the numbers, then, it's not a "myth" that Williams is a better overall rebounder, it's a fact. BBD gets more offensive boards, but Williams crushes him on the defensive end.
Exactly, and considering Shelden has been rebounding at a high rate his entire career where BBD has been doing it only for a handful of games I'd also say it isn't a fluke. BBD can't convert those offensive rebounds around the rim due to his inability to jump either, which makes them less beneficial. Either he needs to drop some pounds and find a way to score down low (not likely) or learn to pass those back out when he gets them so we can get a decent shot.
Not quite; Baby's rebounds per 36 minutes are up 2.1 from last season--that includes ALL his games, not a handful. Baby heard the criticism of his game and at this point he's responded positively.
2nd, Baby actually converts around the rim at a MUCH, MUCH higher percentage than Williams throughout their respective careers. For the first 3 weeks of the season, Williams posted career highs in almost every statistical category, something which has undoubtedly skewed your perception. Look at Sheldon's shooting #s last season (which pretty much mirrored his career #s), compare them with Baby's, and then tell me who struggles to finish inside.
Here are Sheldon's from 2008-2009:
31% of his shots were jumpers, which he hit at an eFG% of 33%
51% of his shots were 'close', which he hit at an eFG% of 45.7%
14% of his jumpers were blocked, while 29% of his close shots were blocked.
Here are Baby's #s last season:
60% of his shots were jumpers, which he hit at an eFG% of 36.9%
36% of his shots were 'close', which he hit at an eFG% of 52.5%
6% of his jumpers were blocked, while 13% of his close shots were blocked.
If you want to look at who got blocked more, I'm sure you'd be surpised to see that Williams got blocked about twice as often as Baby, both from 15 feet and from close to the rim. Crazy, huh?
This season, Baby's jump shot #s are down, mostly due to his thumb, which until recently was impacting his shot in a negative way. Otherwise, he's posting similar #s as last season, and doing it closer to the basket and while gathering 2 extra rebounds per 36 minutes.
There is no rubric in existence that shows or even hints at the fact that Williams is better than Glen Davis. In fact, all evidence points to Baby being the superior player, especially considering that Baby can get his own shot, catch the ball, play the 4 AND 5 (Sheldon's strictly a 4), and play better overall defense.