Welcome Marcus Landry

[fairweatherfan]

i dont see the harm in letting him stay...but heck we didnt play walker ever

unlike walker or gidens, landry looks like a 3 pt shooter. by virtue of or need to spread the floor he may just see a few minutes of action.

If he can figure out our rotations and play hard D consistently he might squeeze his way in to a few minutes.  Doubt we'll see much, but we'll see what Doc thinks.

[Cman]

Welcome Mr. Landry. You have a chance to prove people wrong and make a difference here.....if you don't get cut first...


highlights:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXzz3GJgozw

TP for the highlights. 
I find it funny that there is so little footage of the guy that each highlight is played twice....

[Jon]

Don't see the point of cutting him right away.  We have two open roster spots even with him here.  Unless Danny really thinks he can pick up 3 extra players, there's no point in paying him not to play. 

[KG_ended_Bias]

Honestly Bill Walker runs circles around this new bum we acquired, And why did we take him anyways when we did not even play a more talented Walker. Walker defends better, scores better, rebounds better & plays tougher. All Landry does better is shoot fricking threes which we do too much of anyway. Danny irritated me taking him back & giving up Walker when he clearly didnt have to.  

[Jon]

Honestly Bill Walker runs circles around this new bum we acquired, And why did we take him anyways when we did not even play a more talented Walker. Walker defends better, scores better, rebounds better & plays tougher. All Landry does better is shoot fricking threes which we do too much of anyway. Danny irritated me taking him back & giving up Walker when he clearly didnt have to.  

Well, it's probably much more likely Walker's out of the league in 3 years than an rotation player, but I grant you it's possible. 

It's all about money; however.  Given Nate's contract status, Walker had to be thrown in to make it work.