0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
The Lakers are actually better without Kobe. They won at home against the Spurs without him and won in Utah without him. These two games were blowouts.So the Celtics better not take the Lakers lightly because Kobe is missing, but I don't think they will.
Quote from: Drucci on February 18, 2010, 04:55:57 AMThe Lakers are actually better without Kobe. They won at home against the Spurs without him and won in Utah without him. These two games were blowouts.So the Celtics better not take the Lakers lightly because Kobe is missing, but I don't think they will.What the heck.
Quote from: Tai on February 18, 2010, 10:55:07 AMQuote from: Drucci on February 18, 2010, 04:55:57 AMThe Lakers are actually better without Kobe. They won at home against the Spurs without him and won in Utah without him. These two games were blowouts.So the Celtics better not take the Lakers lightly because Kobe is missing, but I don't think they will.What the heck. Exactly my thoughts when I read that.
Delete this thread... Already predicting losses and who to blame.
and i know this is mindboggling for some people around here as of late....but what if the celts actually win?!
Quote from: RAcker on February 18, 2010, 11:00:58 AMQuote from: Tai on February 18, 2010, 10:55:07 AMQuote from: Drucci on February 18, 2010, 04:55:57 AMThe Lakers are actually better without Kobe. They won at home against the Spurs without him and won in Utah without him. These two games were blowouts.So the Celtics better not take the Lakers lightly because Kobe is missing, but I don't think they will.What the heck. Exactly my thoughts when I read that.The Lakers are not better without Kobe Bryant but they are still a very good team. A 50-55 win team. Very talented.