nope I want Iguodala, Martin, Ellis or Deng.
See my post in the other trade ray thread about what teams get historical for expiring contracts and little else as an offer.
None of those are happening.
I think we have to throw history out the window completely here. There is an unprecedented level of financial woe in the NBA right now. Getting talent back in a trade is probably the 4th highest priority for most teams. The first 3 are as follows:
1. Reduce salary obligations
2. Further reduce salary obligations
3. Go even further to reduce salary obligations
The Celtics have the 2nd most expensive expiring contract in the league (behind TMac). We are in a much better negotiating position than you seem willing to acknowledge.
I've heard this "but now is completely different than any of the history to the contrary" argument before, and you know what?
MAbey your right, mabey this trade deadline will be completely different than every single one that's proceeded it and teams will willingly give up stud players for financial relief and the ability to make a potential unsuccessful run at one of the players from an awesome draft class.
But until ONE trade happens that justify this unbridled optimism about what we can get for an expiring contract and trash bench parts, I'm going to maintain my belief that it takes something more than an expiring contract to get a stud player back.
Since other contenders are more in line to offer that "something" else, I think they may very well get these players, if they move at all.
We'll see what happens at the trade deadline, mabey something nearly unprecedented will happen. Until it does, i think I'm justified in expecting the trades made at the trade deadline to follow the general principles behind most trades.