« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 ... 22   Go Down

Author Topic: Nets (4-44) at Celtics (31-16) 2/5  (Read 71101 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Nets (4-44) at Celtics (31-16) 2/5
« Reply #75 on: February 05, 2010, 08:19:16 PM »

Offline jdpapa3

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3884
  • Tommy Points: 85
Quote from: celticinorlando on February 05, 2010, 08:18:03 PM
walker needs to improve his defense

CDR picked up his dribble and then started dribbling again. I was shocked too.

House is a bum.
Logged
Re: Nets (4-44) at Celtics (31-16) 2/5
« Reply #76 on: February 05, 2010, 08:19:33 PM »

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21257
  • Tommy Points: 2451
Quote from: Chief on February 05, 2010, 08:12:39 PM
Quote from: Chief on February 05, 2010, 07:59:31 PM
I think I would hate playing with Eddie. Nobody likes a chucker!!

 >:(

 >:( >:(
Logged
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird
Re: Nets (4-44) at Celtics (31-16) 2/5
« Reply #77 on: February 05, 2010, 08:19:42 PM »

Offline jadams5214

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1021
  • Tommy Points: 82
Wow this defense is PITIFUL --- against the New Jersey Nets for goodness sake.  Cannot believe they are allowing this all time bad NBA team shoot over 60% midway through the 2nd quarter.  

Well bad Eddie is back --- of course after one good game now he can't even come close the next time out.
Logged
Re: Nets (4-44) at Celtics (31-16) 2/5
« Reply #78 on: February 05, 2010, 08:19:51 PM »

Offline USG

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2126
  • Tommy Points: 161
Really a feast-or-famine night.

Sheed, Davis, Rondo, KG and Ray are feasting.
Everyone else...
Logged
Re: Nets (4-44) at Celtics (31-16) 2/5
« Reply #79 on: February 05, 2010, 08:19:56 PM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
Impressed so far tonight with the C's effort  ::)
Logged
Re: Nets (4-44) at Celtics (31-16) 2/5
« Reply #80 on: February 05, 2010, 08:20:56 PM »

Offline Drucci

  • Global Moderator
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7223
  • Tommy Points: 439
Wow. I'm as speechless and quiet as the Garden. Wake up Celtics, this is embarrassing.
Logged
Re: Nets (4-44) at Celtics (31-16) 2/5
« Reply #81 on: February 05, 2010, 08:21:24 PM »

Offline jdpapa3

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3884
  • Tommy Points: 85
Bench is just ignoring their best offensive option: Rasheed.
Logged
Re: Nets (4-44) at Celtics (31-16) 2/5
« Reply #82 on: February 05, 2010, 08:21:38 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32877
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
thisis the difference between the cavs and celtics....the cavs would be up 10 plus right now over this horrid excuse of a team
Logged
Re: Nets (4-44) at Celtics (31-16) 2/5
« Reply #83 on: February 05, 2010, 08:22:30 PM »

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21257
  • Tommy Points: 2451
Wake Up!!!!!!!!!!


Kiorrik
Logged
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird
Re: Nets (4-44) at Celtics (31-16) 2/5
« Reply #84 on: February 05, 2010, 08:22:42 PM »

Offline jdpapa3

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3884
  • Tommy Points: 85
Quote from: celticinorlando on February 05, 2010, 08:21:38 PM
thisis the difference between the cavs and celtics....the cavs would be up 10 plus right now over this horrid excuse of a team

and burn themselves out for may...like they did last year.
Logged
Re: Nets (4-44) at Celtics (31-16) 2/5
« Reply #85 on: February 05, 2010, 08:23:35 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32877
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
Quote from: jdpapa3 on February 05, 2010, 08:22:42 PM
Quote from: celticinorlando on February 05, 2010, 08:21:38 PM
thisis the difference between the cavs and celtics....the cavs would be up 10 plus right now over this horrid excuse of a team

and burn themselves out for may...like they did last year.

i doubt that...any team with a pulse could beat this team. letting them score at will
Logged
Re: Nets (4-44) at Celtics (31-16) 2/5
« Reply #86 on: February 05, 2010, 08:23:55 PM »

Offline jadams5214

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1021
  • Tommy Points: 82
Yeah not much positive to say about this putrid defensive effort so far tonight.

To be losing midway through the second quarter to the Nets is disgraceful.  The Celtics should be beyond struggling night after night especially at home against horrid teams.

It's almost as if the Nets are in shock.  Most nights they are out of games early but the C's are just giving them open shots and building their confidence.  The longer bad teams hang around the more likely a tough game becomes.

Horrid effort tonight and there is no excuse for the lack of defensive intensity...
Logged
Re: Nets (4-44) at Celtics (31-16) 2/5
« Reply #87 on: February 05, 2010, 08:24:03 PM »

Offline dlpin

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 842
  • Tommy Points: 183
Doc again with the line changes.
Logged
Re: Nets (4-44) at Celtics (31-16) 2/5
« Reply #88 on: February 05, 2010, 08:25:29 PM »

Offline USG

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2126
  • Tommy Points: 161
Who's shooting better, the Nets from 3 points, or the Celtics from 3 feet?
Logged
Re: Nets (4-44) at Celtics (31-16) 2/5
« Reply #89 on: February 05, 2010, 08:25:37 PM »

Offline jdpapa3

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3884
  • Tommy Points: 85
For a 6'11" guy, Perk should finish more of those and 1 type opportunities.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 ... 22   Go Up
« previous next »