I'm afraid the only thing I can dislike about Sheed right now is that he takes too many 3's. But, particularly tonight, and I was at this game, he did post up, and when he did, his defender rarely stood a chance. I always yelled when he got the ball in the post, "You can take him Rasheed! He's got NOTHING on ya!". And most of the time, I was right.
And what about Perkins? Oh yeah, the same guy who had the 6th most technicals in the league last year with 12, and T-15th the year before with 9? Where's Sheed in those pictures?
Everything else you say is pure speculation. End of story. What are we talking about here, anyways; Celtics basketball, or are we giving out Management 200 lectures? Cause college starts for me again in a week, and I'd like to keep it that way. 
Oh btw, you wanna tell us what we'd get in a trade involving Sheed?
You can keep your smart remarks for yourself, as far as I´m concerned.
I´m tired of you attacking a critical post I make about Danny with a sarcastic remark about how we "shouldn´t give managerial advice". That´s what fans all around the world do in every sport every day, it´s pretty hypocritical to criticize someone for that.
I take it, deep down inside, you can´t deny what I´ve said, because your eyes show you they´re not playing good, so you´re trying to attack the source and talk it away. That won´t help, the signs are on the wall.
You can ridicule what I´ve said, but the fact is, where I´m from, these "speculations", as you call them, are the most important things when you talk about trades and make-up of teams (and not only between fans; coaches and ex-players do it, too), and have proven to be important and correct time and time again. Maybe you should read up on the term "group dynamics"?
So chalk it up under "cultural differencies", if you want, and I will chalk it up under the "ostrich-syndrome", and that you only want to stick your head in the sands.
And, btw, I´d be happy with Rasheed and a second-rounder for Captain Spaulding, that´s how bad I want him off this team.
You talk about "smart remarks" and then say you'd trade Rasheed for Captain Spaulding? I wouldn't have smited you for lack or originality if you had just said a bag of chips, you know.
Buddy, if you want me to take your seriously on this issue, then you're gonna have to talk like you ARE serious. If you really believe that's how little value Sheed has to the Celtics, then I won't hold back just to make you feel better. If it looks like I'm laughing at you in my posts, then I probably am, and I won't stop if you make one-liners like that. I'm not doing it to troll you, I'm doing it because I have an opinion too, and quite honestly, it's not in love with you arguably making nothing BUT "smart remarks" about Sheed in "grouptalk" language.
I DO want a serious trade suggestion that ships Sheed out of Boston and brings back someone better. If you really think someone better than Sheed is out there, that's the LEAST you can do.
I just have a hard time believing that Sheed taking wide open 3's and missing them proves he just doesn't care about the team dynamic. All Eddie House arguably can do IS shoot, and he's not done much of that lately. Do your trade wishes involve Eddie, too? Cause between both Eddie and Rasheed behind the arc, they have the same problems; they get the shot, but can't make it.
Also, Sheed was the only one giving Dirk problems. When Sheed got into foul trouble in the 3rd quarter and had to come out, Dirk went off, and that doomed us.
And remember that talk about the plain ride last year where Rondo called a meeting and it didn't work out? Rasheed wasn't there either, but one can argue that team woulda been in the NBA Finals if KG was healthy.
So yes, I don't get what your beef with Rasheed is. I feel like you've never liked Sheed in the first place, and now that the C's aren't doing so hot, you feel this is your best chance to try and get us to turn on Sheed. All cause of a few wide open 3's Sheed had that he missed? Again...does this trade you want involve Eddie?
My new job keeps me busy, and I couldn´t find the time to reply.
I make one-liners because it´s me who doesn´t take you seriously.
And you know why? Because we had this discussion before, and because I´ve called what happens now back then when we traded for Sheed. Where I sit, this is just some kind of gallows humor. So, stick to your hypocritical shots at me, and I will keep making my one-liners, which you use as your angle to downplay my actual post.
Quite frankly. I don´t think I have to come up with any trade scenarios. That´s just a lame internet tactic to, again, get around talking about the actual point I made.
1. It doesn´t matter what I want, Danny certainly won´t listen to me.
2. This team won a championship without Sheed, they can do it again.
"Addition by subtraction" is the magic term here.
First of all, I just want to point out we did not trade for Sheed, we signed him.
Secondly, this is all I get from your post:
"slow + overrated team defender + kills the flow of the offense + victim mentality +
doesn´t get any younger + still out of shape, halfway through the season"
That's the only thing I got from your post that means anything. Everything else you said was like a management 200 lecture, which summed up to calling Rasheed a cancer, when, for god's sake, he hasn't even done that badly. Keep in mind that Rasheed just came off being out for a week and has to do starter minutes when he was supposed to be coming off the bench, and is still doing well.
I mean, anyways, what's your post? The team's not doing well, and it's all Rasheed's fault? That's your post? A "blame game" on someone you admitted you never liked beforehand, and now that the team's not doing so well, you feel this is your chance to start unloading the blame on him?
So, let me start with that quote I put up.
So he's slow? Slow what? Defensively? He's slow to get a shot in the paint? Like I said, he looked like he can post up just fine against the Mavs when I went.
Overrated team defender? I've heard this about Eddie for an awful long time, and on top of his bad shooting this year, people want him out just as much as you claim you want SHeed out. You probably thought I was just taking shots at you when I pointed that out, but not everyone will be sad to see Eddie go if it brings us back Nate, for example.
Kills the flow of the offense? Is this when he takes a 3 and misses? You look around this board enough and you'd think Ray Allen, Eddie House and Scal also killed the flow of the offense. But Sheed not being able to make his 3's doesn't mean he's killing the flow of the offense. I've asked you this before; since Eddie can't make a shot these days, is he tradeable in your eyes? I'm serious. Regardless, I've already said I think Sheed shoot less 3's and stay in the post more.
This victim mentality you speak of...like I said, Perk has picked up a ton of technical fouls the last two years before Sheed came in here. Please also keep in mind that Sheed and Big Baby each have had a foul rescinded; Sheed a technical and Big Baby a flagrant. Doc got fined 25k for complaining about the flagrant called on Big Baby that was later rescinded. I'm not trying to say this is an excuse for Sheed to yell louder, but when the league has to basically say that the refs were wrong on a call that affected our team, I'm not going to make a big deal that Sheed complains in a post-game interview, especially when Doc's doing the same. Keep in mind Doc was also tossed in same said game where Big Baby was called for a flagrant. This "victim mentality" was definitely not started by Rasheed. At worst, the refs now want to call more fouls simply on the C's simply because Sheed's on the team, but like I pointed out, I could say the same thing about Perk before Sheed came.
Doesn't get any younger? Hmm, you mean you don't like Sheed and you're mad he's still on this team for at least another year, right? Because the Big 3 aren't getting any younger either, but I'm sure you'd like them for at least this year and maybe next year too, right?
Then you say he's out of shape....Is this also on top of being "slow"? Cause I addressed that.
Also, you said it doesn't matter what you want because Danny won't listen. I wonder if he'd listen to you only blame Rasheed for the Celtics' woes and no one else, as if it's him and him alone that's making the Celtics lose. But none the less, you do just that. I'm not saying he doesn't deserve some of the blame, but when you go on to say it's "Addition by Subtraction" to get rid of Sheed, you're basically giving everyone else a pass, espeically when Sheed actually looks like he's doing something. It's almost like we're leaving it to guys like you who admit they never liked Sheed before he came here to now try and convince us he's doing very little and making everyone else do very little in the process.
And on that note, what do you mean asking who'd you trade Rasheed for is a "lame internet tactic"? If I had asked you this face to face, would it mean more to you? Wanting Rasheed out just to have him out is flat out ridiculous, I don't care what your personal feelings dictate to you. You claim what you say doesn't matter, but you bash Rasheed regardless, so what's telling us who you think can do what Rasheed's doing for the Celtics and definitely not be a cancer and who we could get?
It doesn't detract from your actual post; it's Rasheed's fault we're losing, and despite the fact he's producing where some are probably aren't, everyone else gets a pass and will do better if he leaves, so much to the point that you're not interested in seeing who could fill Sheed's role.
