Author Topic: Hawks (23-13) at Celtics (26-9) 1/11  (Read 147235 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Hawks (23-13) at Celtics (26-9) 1/11
« Reply #390 on: January 11, 2010, 09:42:04 PM »

Offline MaxwellSmart86

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 918
  • Tommy Points: 144
Where's Scal been?....he was doing a GREAT job defending.........we're gonna lose this by like 8-10 points...WORN OUT.....Thanks to the first half reffing too.

Re: Hawks (23-13) at Celtics (26-9) 1/11
« Reply #391 on: January 11, 2010, 09:42:11 PM »

Offline jdpapa3

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3884
  • Tommy Points: 85
No, it was Doc's pent up frustration throughout the game where we have gotten no calls.

Re: Hawks (23-13) at Celtics (26-9) 1/11
« Reply #392 on: January 11, 2010, 09:42:45 PM »

Offline liam

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 45920
  • Tommy Points: 3340
Does anyone else realize why Doc was so upset resulting in an ejection.

Besides the bad calls it's the pressure of this game  --- Doc no doubt realizes how big this game is against the upstart Hawks.  He sees how vitally important it is for the C's to gain back an edge on this team.

C's outside shots not dropping anymore but they keep taking them instead of going inside...

Coaches get thrown out when there teams are getting hosed. That was a very bad call again!

Re: Hawks (23-13) at Celtics (26-9) 1/11
« Reply #393 on: January 11, 2010, 09:43:08 PM »

Offline houseonfire09

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 914
  • Tommy Points: 44
  • Thank you Eddie!
Can we get Scal back on Josh Smith?
"If David Stern ran the NHL, is there any chance his meal ticket's team would blow a Game 7 in Round 1? Put a pair of skates on Dick Bavetta!" -Bill Simmons

Re: Hawks (23-13) at Celtics (26-9) 1/11
« Reply #394 on: January 11, 2010, 09:43:15 PM »

Offline jadams5214

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1021
  • Tommy Points: 82
Celtics desperately need to hang on here for the win.  As far as regular season games go this is right up there in importance.  Can't afford to lose again to this team.

Ray has ZERO chance against Johnson still true as it was in the first quarter...

Re: Hawks (23-13) at Celtics (26-9) 1/11
« Reply #395 on: January 11, 2010, 09:43:22 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52991
  • Tommy Points: 2571
Joe Johnson is smooth

Re: Hawks (23-13) at Celtics (26-9) 1/11
« Reply #396 on: January 11, 2010, 09:43:27 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
The Celtics have either lost their focus or are tired since that flagrant foul but the Hawks are just in a great position to win the game. I want to puke.

Kiorrik > indeed, good call after I've seen the replay.
The Hawks are a quality team and we're missing our two best PFs and our backup SF.

I don't care if its close, just win it!

Re: Hawks (23-13) at Celtics (26-9) 1/11
« Reply #397 on: January 11, 2010, 09:43:58 PM »

Offline MaxwellSmart86

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 918
  • Tommy Points: 144
Tied game....you gotta be kidding me...what a JOKE

Re: Hawks (23-13) at Celtics (26-9) 1/11
« Reply #398 on: January 11, 2010, 09:44:10 PM »

Offline jdpapa3

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3884
  • Tommy Points: 85
Celtics desperately need to hang on here for the win.  As far as regular season games go this is right up there in importance.  Can't afford to lose again to this team.

Ray has ZERO chance against Johnson still true as it was in the first quarter...

He was right on him. Great players hit great shots.

Re: Hawks (23-13) at Celtics (26-9) 1/11
« Reply #399 on: January 11, 2010, 09:44:50 PM »

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21259
  • Tommy Points: 2451
Does Thibs realize ther are guys on the bench?

this is an important game for the Celtics.

You can't play old guys for an entire half. Especially on a back to back. Right now, what you are seeing, are tired legs.

So you want to to see House playing Point, or Tony shooting 3's. Our Bench right now is nonexistent.

Yes. It should have been done at the end of the 3rd. Just a few minutes. It would have been a 10 minute rest.
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Hawks (23-13) at Celtics (26-9) 1/11
« Reply #400 on: January 11, 2010, 09:44:59 PM »

Kiorrik

  • Guest
That could have just as easily been a flagrant on Ray tbh :p

Re: Hawks (23-13) at Celtics (26-9) 1/11
« Reply #401 on: January 11, 2010, 09:45:17 PM »

Offline jadams5214

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1021
  • Tommy Points: 82
C's with 18 turnovers.
C's 3 point shot has disappeared in the second half.
C's can't defend Joe Johnson.
C's offense has gone south in the second half after a great first half.

Can't blame ANY of that on the refs...

Re: Hawks (23-13) at Celtics (26-9) 1/11
« Reply #402 on: January 11, 2010, 09:45:35 PM »

Offline mzepol

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 308
  • Tommy Points: 56
JJ is just too big for Ray.

Re: Hawks (23-13) at Celtics (26-9) 1/11
« Reply #403 on: January 11, 2010, 09:45:59 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
Baby bringing the bulk.

Re: Hawks (23-13) at Celtics (26-9) 1/11
« Reply #404 on: January 11, 2010, 09:46:30 PM »

Kiorrik

  • Guest
C's with 18 turnovers.
C's 3 point shot has disappeared in the second half.
C's can't defend Joe Johnson.
C's offense has gone south in the second half after a great first half.

Can't blame ANY of that on the refs...
Why don't you _ever_ point out the good stuff m8? I've yet to hear you say "that was a nice play!" or "we're shooting really well!" etc.

Just wondering.