Talent-wise, Iverson still trumps bench guys like Eddie House and Tony Allen by a wide margin. Everyone wants to throw his talent under the bus as he becomes more of a villain, but he's only 1 ugly season removed from putting up 26 PPG / 7 APG / 2 STL in Denver, and shooting 46% doing it (with 10 FTA). He sleepwalked through Detroit last year and put up 17 / 5. He's not a franchise guy any more, but he's still very good.
Kevin Garnett has lost a step or 2 (or 3) since his prime. Heck, so has Paul Pierce and so has Ray Allen. But nobody would argue for a second that they are not still very good players. Iverson is like that talent-wise, right there with the big 3. He's just possibly out of his mind as well.
All I ask is please, none of this "he was never that good, he shot too much" stuff. The dude was spectacular. He's just a head case as well.
If someone, anyone could convince Iverson to come to Boston, play defense, pass the ball, and take Eddie House's minutes plus some extra rest for Ray Ray and Pierce, and push Daniels back to SF where he belongs all the time... he could quite possibly write his ticket to the HOF and cement his legacy. We would have the deepest squad in the league, no question about it. 15 MPG from House, a few minutes each from Rondo and Allen, some spot starts... it could totally work. You know, if Iverson decided to accept a role and play for the team concept. Ha!!!
I think the only way we would go after Iverson would be if Rondo got hurt. And I'd certainly rather keep Rondo on the court. But if that happened (knock on wood knock on wood), then we could start Iverson, play up the whole "Big 4" and see what happened versus handing over the PG reigns to House and Daniels. Our window is limited and it would probably be worth the gamble. Iverson starts and gets a clear shot at a title.