I know Rasheed said it about a week ago, but I'm curious to what you guys think: can the C's win 72 or more?  And I've purposely phrased it the way I have; I'm well aware that injuries could derail any effort to win 72+.  But assuming they stay healthy, is 72+ a possibility. ?

Personally, I'm saying yes.  They won 66 games with Rondo and Perk half the players they are today, with less chemistry, and without Rasheed, who is the best bench player they've had in over 20 years.  Moreover, Marquis Daniels may be good enough to replace most of what James Posey took with him when he left.  If they got within 6 of 72 two years ago, there's no reason they can't win 6 or 7 more with all the talent they've added since then.   

And for those who think the East has gotten so much better, has it really?  Two years ago Detroit was still a force to be reckoned with, not so anymore.  And while Orlando made the Finals this past year, let's face it, if KG was healthy the C's would've knocked them out of the second round in 4 or 5 games and no one would think anything of them now.  Same with Chicago.  They were made to look good because KG was out.  Had he been there, the C's would've swept their butts out of the first round and everyone would think they're garbage.  And besides that, who other than Cleveland is more than a 40-45 win team? 

So I'm interested, is this team capable of winning 72 games?