0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Fafnir on September 03, 2009, 10:06:37 AMSo you're taking a ten game sample size to dismiss a much larger body of improved shooting? Okay....And per/36 numbers are not wildly inaccurate when a player has been in the NBA for quite some time and been getting consistent minutes. Players production is usually very consistent on the per minute level.I don't know what you want, I gave you his full season shot chart and then his last ten games when he was playing heavy minutes and they're pretty much the same.Is it that hard to admit he isn't that good of a midrange shooter? Decent, yea ok but not nearly as good as he is cracked up to be around here.
So you're taking a ten game sample size to dismiss a much larger body of improved shooting? Okay....And per/36 numbers are not wildly inaccurate when a player has been in the NBA for quite some time and been getting consistent minutes. Players production is usually very consistent on the per minute level.
Quote from: lon3lytoaster on September 03, 2009, 05:57:34 AMQuote from: Drucci on September 03, 2009, 05:50:02 AMHis shooting percentages are awful but I'm not worried, since we won't ask him to shoot too much but more to drive and score in the paint. Plus, he will be playing alonsgside Rasheed and House, two excellent shooters who can spread the floor.And maybe Ray will teach Marquis how to shoot the ball... but I may be asking too much there. haha well, Ray hasn't turned Rondo into a sniper yet so I don't think that'll be be the case with MarquisBut seriously, my concern is with spacing and I'm not entirely sure if we have it to really have an effective bench and help Marquis score. He was signed to score the ball and bring it up court so Eddie wouldn't have to. The problem with Rasheed shooting the threes is that he isn't going to be rebounding much, that's been the story his entire career. We know he's going to do his thing no matter what, so then where are the boards coming from? Davis is lackluster there, KG's numbers are going down and Perk can't play 48 minutes. I'm just not sold on the idea that we'll have a really effective bench overall, I guess.That's one of the ways we'll miss Powe, and why Shelden Williams may have a surprising opportunity to challenge Baby for minutes, I think.
Quote from: Drucci on September 03, 2009, 05:50:02 AMHis shooting percentages are awful but I'm not worried, since we won't ask him to shoot too much but more to drive and score in the paint. Plus, he will be playing alonsgside Rasheed and House, two excellent shooters who can spread the floor.And maybe Ray will teach Marquis how to shoot the ball... but I may be asking too much there. haha well, Ray hasn't turned Rondo into a sniper yet so I don't think that'll be be the case with MarquisBut seriously, my concern is with spacing and I'm not entirely sure if we have it to really have an effective bench and help Marquis score. He was signed to score the ball and bring it up court so Eddie wouldn't have to. The problem with Rasheed shooting the threes is that he isn't going to be rebounding much, that's been the story his entire career. We know he's going to do his thing no matter what, so then where are the boards coming from? Davis is lackluster there, KG's numbers are going down and Perk can't play 48 minutes. I'm just not sold on the idea that we'll have a really effective bench overall, I guess.
His shooting percentages are awful but I'm not worried, since we won't ask him to shoot too much but more to drive and score in the paint. Plus, he will be playing alonsgside Rasheed and House, two excellent shooters who can spread the floor.And maybe Ray will teach Marquis how to shoot the ball... but I may be asking too much there.
Quote from: clover on September 03, 2009, 10:35:42 AMQuote from: lon3lytoaster on September 03, 2009, 05:57:34 AMQuote from: Drucci on September 03, 2009, 05:50:02 AMHis shooting percentages are awful but I'm not worried, since we won't ask him to shoot too much but more to drive and score in the paint. Plus, he will be playing alonsgside Rasheed and House, two excellent shooters who can spread the floor.And maybe Ray will teach Marquis how to shoot the ball... but I may be asking too much there. haha well, Ray hasn't turned Rondo into a sniper yet so I don't think that'll be be the case with MarquisBut seriously, my concern is with spacing and I'm not entirely sure if we have it to really have an effective bench and help Marquis score. He was signed to score the ball and bring it up court so Eddie wouldn't have to. The problem with Rasheed shooting the threes is that he isn't going to be rebounding much, that's been the story his entire career. We know he's going to do his thing no matter what, so then where are the boards coming from? Davis is lackluster there, KG's numbers are going down and Perk can't play 48 minutes. I'm just not sold on the idea that we'll have a really effective bench overall, I guess.That's one of the ways we'll miss Powe, and why Shelden Williams may have a surprising opportunity to challenge Baby for minutes, I think.I don't think so, not until there is an injury. You never know but Sheldon's offensive limitations and the time it will take him to absorb the system will give BBD a huge leg up.It'd be a nice surprise if he could though.
Quote from: Fafnir on September 03, 2009, 12:52:50 PMQuote from: clover on September 03, 2009, 10:35:42 AMQuote from: lon3lytoaster on September 03, 2009, 05:57:34 AMQuote from: Drucci on September 03, 2009, 05:50:02 AMHis shooting percentages are awful but I'm not worried, since we won't ask him to shoot too much but more to drive and score in the paint. Plus, he will be playing alonsgside Rasheed and House, two excellent shooters who can spread the floor.And maybe Ray will teach Marquis how to shoot the ball... but I may be asking too much there. haha well, Ray hasn't turned Rondo into a sniper yet so I don't think that'll be be the case with MarquisBut seriously, my concern is with spacing and I'm not entirely sure if we have it to really have an effective bench and help Marquis score. He was signed to score the ball and bring it up court so Eddie wouldn't have to. The problem with Rasheed shooting the threes is that he isn't going to be rebounding much, that's been the story his entire career. We know he's going to do his thing no matter what, so then where are the boards coming from? Davis is lackluster there, KG's numbers are going down and Perk can't play 48 minutes. I'm just not sold on the idea that we'll have a really effective bench overall, I guess.That's one of the ways we'll miss Powe, and why Shelden Williams may have a surprising opportunity to challenge Baby for minutes, I think.I don't think so, not until there is an injury. You never know but Sheldon's offensive limitations and the time it will take him to absorb the system will give BBD a huge leg up.It'd be a nice surprise if he could though.I agree, Shelden will find the minutes hard to come by to start the season. I figure we'll start to see him get some rotation after the new year. UNLESS, Doc feels the need to motivate Baby, we'll see how committed he is to rebound and defense this season.
I don't think its a lack of effort that limits BBD's rebounds. He's short for his position, has short arms, and has limited jumping ability.Just not a recipe for a good defensive rebounder.
Quote from: Fafnir on September 03, 2009, 02:06:54 PMI don't think its a lack of effort that limits BBD's rebounds. He's short for his position, has short arms, and has limited jumping ability.Just not a recipe for a good defensive rebounder.I dunno.. I think effort can make up for some of his physical shortcomings. I occasionally see him chasing loose balls like his career is at stake, and I find myself thinking wow - how did he do that?!
Quote from: pengaloo on September 03, 2009, 02:25:40 PMQuote from: Fafnir on September 03, 2009, 02:06:54 PMI don't think its a lack of effort that limits BBD's rebounds. He's short for his position, has short arms, and has limited jumping ability.Just not a recipe for a good defensive rebounder.I dunno.. I think effort can make up for some of his physical shortcomings. I occasionally see him chasing loose balls like his career is at stake, and I find myself thinking wow - how did he do that?!yeah I mean with a butt like that he should be able to box out, seal his man, and get a few more boards a game, imho. I would say that as a PF in this league that rebounding is by far his biggest weakness right now.
Quote from: MaineBleedsGreen on September 03, 2009, 03:37:13 PMQuote from: pengaloo on September 03, 2009, 02:25:40 PMQuote from: Fafnir on September 03, 2009, 02:06:54 PMI don't think its a lack of effort that limits BBD's rebounds. He's short for his position, has short arms, and has limited jumping ability.Just not a recipe for a good defensive rebounder.I dunno.. I think effort can make up for some of his physical shortcomings. I occasionally see him chasing loose balls like his career is at stake, and I find myself thinking wow - how did he do that?!yeah I mean with a butt like that he should be able to box out, seal his man, and get a few more boards a game, imho. I would say that as a PF in this league that rebounding is by far his biggest weakness right now. He boxes out fine. He just doesn't have the tools to be a great rebounder. I'm sure he could improve. But given his rebounding rate has been constant on the defensive glass for two years I don't think its likely.Its not like BBD has a reputation for dogging it in Boston.
Daniels isn't a guy who will be jacking up threes. He mainly takes 16 foot shots and in. The penetration will be effective for our three point shooters and he can play defense, plus he's only 27 or 28. Yes, he can play off the bench effectively
Quote from: ToppersBsktball10 on September 03, 2009, 03:42:26 PMDaniels isn't a guy who will be jacking up threes. He mainly takes 16 foot shots and in. The penetration will be effective for our three point shooters and he can play defense, plus he's only 27 or 28. Yes, he can play off the bench effectively Agreed, his game is similar to Tony's. A better player though. Hopefully it works, sometimes teams would really punish us when Tony/Rondo were out there together.
Quote from: Fafnir on September 03, 2009, 06:26:51 PMQuote from: MaineBleedsGreen on September 03, 2009, 03:37:13 PMQuote from: pengaloo on September 03, 2009, 02:25:40 PMQuote from: Fafnir on September 03, 2009, 02:06:54 PMI don't think its a lack of effort that limits BBD's rebounds. He's short for his position, has short arms, and has limited jumping ability.Just not a recipe for a good defensive rebounder.I dunno.. I think effort can make up for some of his physical shortcomings. I occasionally see him chasing loose balls like his career is at stake, and I find myself thinking wow - how did he do that?!yeah I mean with a butt like that he should be able to box out, seal his man, and get a few more boards a game, imho. I would say that as a PF in this league that rebounding is by far his biggest weakness right now. He boxes out fine. He just doesn't have the tools to be a great rebounder. I'm sure he could improve. But given his rebounding rate has been constant on the defensive glass for two years I don't think its likely.Its not like BBD has a reputation for dogging it in Boston.So in conclusion, Daniels will be just fine off the bench.
Me being the basketball stat nerd that I am, was checking up on Daniels' season splits and saw some interesting numbers.6.8PPG, 3.4 RPG, 1.4 APG in 20 minutes. The really scary parts are 42.5% from the field, 42.9 from the line and 11 (!) percent from three. It's in a pretty small sample size over only 11 games, but he isn't going to start in Boston. Seeing those numbers makes me a little nervous, I knew he couldn't shoot well but I mean Rondo is a significantly better shooter and that's saying something, and not something good. Do we really have the depth that a lot of us think we have?
Quote from: lon3lytoaster on September 03, 2009, 05:38:48 AMMe being the basketball stat nerd that I am, was checking up on Daniels' season splits and saw some interesting numbers.6.8PPG, 3.4 RPG, 1.4 APG in 20 minutes. The really scary parts are 42.5% from the field, 42.9 from the line and 11 (!) percent from three. It's in a pretty small sample size over only 11 games, but he isn't going to start in Boston. Seeing those numbers makes me a little nervous, I knew he couldn't shoot well but I mean Rondo is a significantly better shooter and that's saying something, and not something good. Do we really have the depth that a lot of us think we have?42.9% from the line?Is that seriously his FT%?I think Daniels is gonna be a good bench player, but not great. He's a long way off from Posey.I honestly think Eddie is a better player off the bench for us.