I'd rather have Ime Udoka or Keith Bogans ... but I'd be happy enough with Pavlovic as the squad's second wing off the bench.
Why? Pavlovic is bigger and better shooter than both. Just curious as to your reasoning..
I think Udoka is a better defender and Bogans a comparable defender. Both are far superior rebounders.
I don't consider Pavlovic a better shooter. I don't have a lot of trust in his shot, he's very streaky, it comes and goes. Also, the '07-08 season bothers my trust in his shot too. Same problem with Udoka. Udoka had a poor shooting year last season, but he shot 37% and 40% from three point range in the two years prior, and I think he can get back to that form (career rate of 37% slightly better than Sasha's 36%). Udoka also has a better TS% because a larger percentage of his shots come from behind the arc (40+% vs 30% for Sasha). I think Bogans has the most consistent/reliable/least likely to go missing perimeter shot of the trio, but he's not as potent as the other two when they're hitting their shots.
Overall, I think they're all fairly comparable shooting wise. Some differences in consistency and accuracy, but somewhat similar overall.
So, I'd pick Udoka and Bogans mainly because of their superior rebounding ability ... and Udoka as my favourite because I think he's the best defender of the bunch.