Total Members Voted: 61
Voting closed: August 01, 2009, 09:03:41 PM
0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
TA without a doubt, but I fear to make the S&T it will have to be Scal.
Quote from: SCBirdman on July 27, 2009, 10:25:29 PMTA without a doubt, but I fear to make the S&T it will have to be Scal.You fear them having to take a guy barely good enough for the vet minimum who makes over $3MM a year.This guy has negative value, yet for some reason is viewed as a positive by some fans. The sooner we get rid of him, the better. Does he have some use? Yes, but the guy isn't as good as Joe Smith who likely comes at a cheaper price.
I think your view is definitely in the minority. Regardless, Scal is much more serviceable than TA, and more productive. Scal is a nice 4th big and can stretch the D. TA has no confidence in his game and is a turnover or ill-advised shot waiting to happen.
Hope Tony isn't looking at this poll. Poor Tony. No votes. haha
Quote from: SCBirdman on July 27, 2009, 10:49:11 PMI think your view is definitely in the minority. Regardless, Scal is much more serviceable than TA, and more productive. Scal is a nice 4th big and can stretch the D. TA has no confidence in his game and is a turnover or ill-advised shot waiting to happen.I have no qualms saying that Scalabrine is worth more than Tony Allen. I'm simply saying that the guy doesn't do anything to suggest that he's worth more than the minimum at this point in his career. The guy has basically stolen a check for the past 5 years overpaid by a minimum of $2MM a year, but because he tries hard ... people overlook it. I'm looking forward to the day where his salary is reflective of his pay.
What a difference a year makes. Last year at this time there were probably more people who thought Scal was the absolute worst player in the league than people who thought he could fill a role for us.