I agree, but you also Add Horford, a more mature Josh Smith and Marvin Williams. And lets not rewrite history, Joe Johnson was the one who took that series to 7 games
I'm just saying, Bibby also brought a lot of leadership. Also, his decision to "go public" and take a lot of scrutiny on to his shoulders allowed the younger guys to escape some of the spotlight.
I'm not sure how we got on this subject, though; I joined late. I like both Bibby *and* Miller; they each bring different strengths, but both are good starters.
Lol I can't believe you guys are actually arguing two good quality starting PG's. Roy got it right in his last paragraph.
Great Taste!
Less Filling!
But let's keep the debate going shall we? To Roy's who's been on more 50 win temas, how about who's been on more under 25 win teams? (Answer: Not Miller).
Also Miller hasn't been on a less than 40 win team since his 4th year in the league (excluding the year he was traded mid-season, I believe but can't verify both teams were on pace for 40 wins with him). In 2 of the last 3 seasons, Bibby was on under 40 win teams. Lol, please know I'm just playing devils advocate here and not really serious. Bibby/Miller are both quality starting point guards, I'm surprised we're seeing so much debate.
and doing a great job at it
p.s. I NEVER enters the debate between bibby and Miller
i enter the debate between
Manu, Redd, Delonte, Bibby, ross , Jrue and dudley vrs Miller, Afflalo, Brooks and bellinelly
what do u think on that one?

Share 100 points between them.