Author Topic: My problem with signing Daniels  (Read 19757 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: My problem with signing Daniels
« Reply #120 on: July 22, 2009, 02:36:13 PM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
Last year the defense off the bench was poor though, and Daniels still doesn't replace ALL of what Posey was.

So your MAIN problem is that Daniels isn't Posey.  Well, DUH.  IF Ainge had wanted Posey and that contract he would have traded for him.  But he didn't.  And Posey looks to be in decline quite honestly. 

The Celts need a backup PG sure, and they need another backup big who can guard the taller SFs in the league.  But those are filler guys.  Daniels is a quality backup who can slash and score.  He's like Brian Shaw or Rickey Davis but without a 3 pt shot or the head issues.  That's perfectly fine for the second unit and helps balance out the shooters we have in House and Wallace and hopefully Big Baby in unit 2.
I disagree that these guys HAVE to be filler guys.  Why couldn't we fill one of those positions with a quality backup who will more fit our needs? 

  Aside from the fact that Daniels does fit our needs, how many quality backups who you think fill our needs better are available in our price range?

Re: My problem with signing Daniels
« Reply #121 on: July 22, 2009, 02:43:00 PM »

Offline GKC

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 658
  • Tommy Points: 80
  • !@#$%
Last year the defense off the bench was poor though, and Daniels still doesn't replace ALL of what Posey was.

So your MAIN problem is that Daniels isn't Posey.  Well, DUH.  IF Ainge had wanted Posey and that contract he would have traded for him.  But he didn't.  And Posey looks to be in decline quite honestly. 

The Celts need a backup PG sure, and they need another backup big who can guard the taller SFs in the league.  But those are filler guys.  Daniels is a quality backup who can slash and score.  He's like Brian Shaw or Rickey Davis but without a 3 pt shot or the head issues.  That's perfectly fine for the second unit and helps balance out the shooters we have in House and Wallace and hopefully Big Baby in unit 2.
I disagree that these guys HAVE to be filler guys.  Why couldn't we fill one of those positions with a quality backup who will more fit our needs? 

  Aside from the fact that Daniels does fit our needs, how many quality backups who you think fill our needs better are available in our price range?

Couldn't have set it better. In fact, all the backups we listed that would be above Daniels, only Matt Barnes is below our price range (if the reported LLE signing is true). Anthony Parker, Grant Hill and Jamario Moon (who I actually think the Heat might match) are all getting paid above the LLE, for more years as well.
[img width= height= alt=]http://www.thegarz.net/Core/lucky.jpg[/img]

Never Forget

"Just because I stand over you doesn't mean you understand me" - Qwel

Re: My problem with signing Daniels
« Reply #122 on: July 23, 2009, 04:14:27 AM »

Offline mgent

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7567
  • Tommy Points: 1962
Last year the defense off the bench was poor though, and Daniels still doesn't replace ALL of what Posey was.

So your MAIN problem is that Daniels isn't Posey.  Well, DUH.  IF Ainge had wanted Posey and that contract he would have traded for him.  But he didn't.  And Posey looks to be in decline quite honestly. 

The Celts need a backup PG sure, and they need another backup big who can guard the taller SFs in the league.  But those are filler guys.  Daniels is a quality backup who can slash and score.  He's like Brian Shaw or Rickey Davis but without a 3 pt shot or the head issues.  That's perfectly fine for the second unit and helps balance out the shooters we have in House and Wallace and hopefully Big Baby in unit 2.
I disagree that these guys HAVE to be filler guys.  Why couldn't we fill one of those positions with a quality backup who will more fit our needs? 

  Aside from the fact that Daniels does fit our needs, how many quality backups who you think fill our needs better are available in our price range?

Couldn't have set it better. In fact, all the backups we listed that would be above Daniels, only Matt Barnes is below our price range (if the reported LLE signing is true). Anthony Parker, Grant Hill and Jamario Moon (who I actually think the Heat might match) are all getting paid above the LLE, for more years as well.
So will Daniels i hear.
Philly:

Anderson Varejao    Tiago Splitter    Matt Bonner
David West    Kenyon Martin    Brad Miller
Andre Iguodala    Josh Childress    Marquis Daniels
Dwyane Wade    Leandro Barbosa
Kirk Hinrich    Toney Douglas   + the legendary Kevin McHale

Re: My problem with signing Daniels
« Reply #123 on: July 23, 2009, 04:19:53 AM »

Offline GKC

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 658
  • Tommy Points: 80
  • !@#$%
Last year the defense off the bench was poor though, and Daniels still doesn't replace ALL of what Posey was.

So your MAIN problem is that Daniels isn't Posey.  Well, DUH.  IF Ainge had wanted Posey and that contract he would have traded for him.  But he didn't.  And Posey looks to be in decline quite honestly. 

The Celts need a backup PG sure, and they need another backup big who can guard the taller SFs in the league.  But those are filler guys.  Daniels is a quality backup who can slash and score.  He's like Brian Shaw or Rickey Davis but without a 3 pt shot or the head issues.  That's perfectly fine for the second unit and helps balance out the shooters we have in House and Wallace and hopefully Big Baby in unit 2.
I disagree that these guys HAVE to be filler guys.  Why couldn't we fill one of those positions with a quality backup who will more fit our needs? 

  Aside from the fact that Daniels does fit our needs, how many quality backups who you think fill our needs better are available in our price range?

Couldn't have set it better. In fact, all the backups we listed that would be above Daniels, only Matt Barnes is below our price range (if the reported LLE signing is true). Anthony Parker, Grant Hill and Jamario Moon (who I actually think the Heat might match) are all getting paid above the LLE, for more years as well.
So will Daniels i hear.

All the rumours list S+T or LLE. So even in a S+T I don't think he would be getting paid that much.

Also, the signings I listed were signed straight out, nothing we could have afforded without trading.
[img width= height= alt=]http://www.thegarz.net/Core/lucky.jpg[/img]

Never Forget

"Just because I stand over you doesn't mean you understand me" - Qwel

Re: My problem with signing Daniels
« Reply #124 on: July 23, 2009, 01:59:28 PM »

Offline mgent

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7567
  • Tommy Points: 1962
Last year the defense off the bench was poor though, and Daniels still doesn't replace ALL of what Posey was.

So your MAIN problem is that Daniels isn't Posey.  Well, DUH.  IF Ainge had wanted Posey and that contract he would have traded for him.  But he didn't.  And Posey looks to be in decline quite honestly. 

The Celts need a backup PG sure, and they need another backup big who can guard the taller SFs in the league.  But those are filler guys.  Daniels is a quality backup who can slash and score.  He's like Brian Shaw or Rickey Davis but without a 3 pt shot or the head issues.  That's perfectly fine for the second unit and helps balance out the shooters we have in House and Wallace and hopefully Big Baby in unit 2.
I disagree that these guys HAVE to be filler guys.  Why couldn't we fill one of those positions with a quality backup who will more fit our needs? 

  Aside from the fact that Daniels does fit our needs, how many quality backups who you think fill our needs better are available in our price range?

Couldn't have set it better. In fact, all the backups we listed that would be above Daniels, only Matt Barnes is below our price range (if the reported LLE signing is true). Anthony Parker, Grant Hill and Jamario Moon (who I actually think the Heat might match) are all getting paid above the LLE, for more years as well.
So will Daniels i hear.

All the rumours list S+T or LLE. So even in a S+T I don't think he would be getting paid that much.

Also, the signings I listed were signed straight out, nothing we could have afforded without trading.
I know, I agree.  But why hasn't he been signed yet?
Philly:

Anderson Varejao    Tiago Splitter    Matt Bonner
David West    Kenyon Martin    Brad Miller
Andre Iguodala    Josh Childress    Marquis Daniels
Dwyane Wade    Leandro Barbosa
Kirk Hinrich    Toney Douglas   + the legendary Kevin McHale