Author Topic: Ainge's next signing should give us a better idea  (Read 9439 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Ainge's next signing should give us a better idea
« Reply #15 on: July 18, 2009, 06:18:31 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
I don't get the whole "using Daniels as a PG thing". According to 82games.com he played a little PG in 07-08 when Indiana was desperate because all they had was Denier and Tinsley but other than that he's been a SG or SF.

Let's not confuse being able to handle the ball well with being a team's primary back up PG because he can't do that. Daniels I feel will be a great pick up to do exactly what this team needed which was spell Ray and Paul and still be effective. He's a great pick up in that sense. But this team still needs another big(Baby, Joe Smith, Rasho Nesterovic) and a back up PG.

Re: Ainge's next signing should give us a better idea
« Reply #16 on: July 18, 2009, 06:26:19 PM »

Offline footey

  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16039
  • Tommy Points: 1837
Some of you guys are ignoring the fact that players will only be content with a certain amount of playing time. I wouldn't be shocked If Danny just resigned BBD and called it a day. A ten man rotation only works in video games (barely in 2k). Sheed, and Daniels are going to want more than just 10-13 minutes. What we should be looking to pick up are serviceable vets who wouldn't mind riding the pine.

Let's say this is how the minute fall for the starters.
Rondo 36
Ray 35
Pierce 35
Garnet 34
Perkins 28

Assuming this is the starters minutes we have 72 minutes left to go around. 12 behind Rondo, 13 at each wing position, 34 at the PF/C. These guys are going to expect to play a certain amount of minutes, House probably wants 10-15, Daniel 15-20, Sheed 25-30, Baby probably 15-20. After these guys get their minutes their isn't going to be much left, bringing in someone else who is going to demand minutes won't work.

Excellent point.

Re: Ainge's next signing should give us a better idea
« Reply #17 on: July 18, 2009, 06:28:00 PM »

Offline footey

  • JoJo White
  • ****************
  • Posts: 16039
  • Tommy Points: 1837
I don't get the whole "using Daniels as a PG thing". According to 82games.com he played a little PG in 07-08 when Indiana was desperate because all they had was Denier and Tinsley but other than that he's been a SG or SF.

Let's not confuse being able to handle the ball well with being a team's primary back up PG because he can't do that. Daniels I feel will be a great pick up to do exactly what this team needed which was spell Ray and Paul and still be effective. He's a great pick up in that sense. But this team still needs another big(Baby, Joe Smith, Rasho Nesterovic) and a back up PG.

I think Nellie used him at point in Dallas when Nash was hurt, his first season, and he did quite well.  Not his primary role, obviously, however.

Re: Ainge's next signing should give us a better idea
« Reply #18 on: July 18, 2009, 06:42:41 PM »

Offline indeedproceed

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 42585
  • Tommy Points: 2756
  • You ain't the boss of the freakin' bedclothes.
I'd like if we signed Ime Udoka still very much.

Jason Collins would also be a good edition as our last big.

"You've gotta respect a 15-percent 3-point shooter. A guy
like that is always lethal." - Evan 'The God' Turner

Re: Ainge's next signing should give us a better idea
« Reply #19 on: July 18, 2009, 06:59:07 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
Some of you guys are ignoring the fact that players will only be content with a certain amount of playing time. I wouldn't be shocked If Danny just resigned BBD and called it a day. A ten man rotation only works in video games (barely in 2k). Sheed, and Daniels are going to want more than just 10-13 minutes. What we should be looking to pick up are serviceable vets who wouldn't mind riding the pine.

Let's say this is how the minute fall for the starters.
Rondo 36
Ray 35
Pierce 35
Garnet 34
Perkins 28

Assuming this is the starters minutes we have 72 minutes left to go around. 12 behind Rondo, 13 at each wing position, 34 at the PF/C. These guys are going to expect to play a certain amount of minutes, House probably wants 10-15, Daniel 15-20, Sheed 25-30, Baby probably 15-20. After these guys get their minutes their isn't going to be much left, bringing in someone else who is going to demand minutes won't work.

Excellent point.
Not really because Garnett hasn't averaged anywhere near 34 MPG since he has been here, Perk is going to have his numbers limited because of shoulder woes and it's likely with Daniels aboard that Paul and Ray will be slightly lower minutes.

I see more like

KG      30 MPG
Perk    28 MPG
Pierce  34 MPG
Allen   33 MPG
Rondo   36 MPG

I see then that these bench minutes will be available

Sheed   25 MPG
Baby    15 MPG
Daniels 22 MPG
House   12 MPG
Others   5 MPG

This gets everyone good minutes but reasonable minutes and all should be healthy and fresh come playoffs.

Re: Ainge's next signing should give us a better idea
« Reply #20 on: July 18, 2009, 07:43:57 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32877
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
i think with sheed and maybe baby...doc will be VERY careful with KG's minutes...esp early on

Re: Ainge's next signing should give us a better idea
« Reply #21 on: July 18, 2009, 08:22:08 PM »

Offline pearljammer10

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13129
  • Tommy Points: 885
My immediate thought when Daniels was signed was, hmmm we still need an athletic scoring and shooting three. I think Daniels will play alongside Eddie alot and be used as a PG on offense and a SG on defense which I think would be a great idea. I'd love to see a sign and trade of Tony and Scal for Daniels, then a sign and trade with Baby for someone like Travis Outlaw then use the LLE on a power forward/ center type big man and really make that bench something special.

Re: Ainge's next signing should give us a better idea
« Reply #22 on: July 19, 2009, 12:16:54 AM »

Offline xmuscularghandix

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7620
  • Tommy Points: 280
He's 6'6" i think he could be used as a 123 just like his whole career.

Re: Ainge's next signing should give us a better idea
« Reply #23 on: July 19, 2009, 12:23:51 AM »

Offline GKC

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 658
  • Tommy Points: 80
  • !@#$%
Some of you guys are ignoring the fact that players will only be content with a certain amount of playing time. I wouldn't be shocked If Danny just resigned BBD and called it a day. A ten man rotation only works in video games (barely in 2k). Sheed, and Daniels are going to want more than just 10-13 minutes. What we should be looking to pick up are serviceable vets who wouldn't mind riding the pine.

Let's say this is how the minute fall for the starters.
Rondo 36
Ray 35
Pierce 35
Garnet 34
Perkins 28

Assuming this is the starters minutes we have 72 minutes left to go around. 12 behind Rondo, 13 at each wing position, 34 at the PF/C. These guys are going to expect to play a certain amount of minutes, House probably wants 10-15, Daniel 15-20, Sheed 25-30, Baby probably 15-20. After these guys get their minutes their isn't going to be much left, bringing in someone else who is going to demand minutes won't work.

Excellent point.
Not really because Garnett hasn't averaged anywhere near 34 MPG since he has been here, Perk is going to have his numbers limited because of shoulder woes and it's likely with Daniels aboard that Paul and Ray will be slightly lower minutes.

I see more like

KG      30 MPG
Perk    28 MPG
Pierce  34 MPG
Allen   33 MPG
Rondo   36 MPG

I see then that these bench minutes will be available

Sheed   25 MPG
Baby    15 MPG
Daniels 22 MPG
House   12 MPG
Others   5 MPG

This gets everyone good minutes but reasonable minutes and all should be healthy and fresh come playoffs.

Numbers don't add up totally. It assumes we would use a 3 big lineup.
[img width= height= alt=]http://www.thegarz.net/Core/lucky.jpg[/img]

Never Forget

"Just because I stand over you doesn't mean you understand me" - Qwel

Re: Ainge's next signing should give us a better idea
« Reply #24 on: July 19, 2009, 12:26:56 AM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34114
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
I don't get the whole "using Daniels as a PG thing". According to 82games.com he played a little PG in 07-08 when Indiana was desperate because all they had was Denier and Tinsley but other than that he's been a SG or SF.

Let's not confuse being able to handle the ball well with being a team's primary back up PG because he can't do that. Daniels I feel will be a great pick up to do exactly what this team needed which was spell Ray and Paul and still be effective. He's a great pick up in that sense. But this team still needs another big(Baby, Joe Smith, Rasho Nesterovic) and a back up PG.

Outside of take pressure off House with the reserves, he is not the answer for backup PG.  That's why I like a player like Carter.  Able to step in and start for short stretches.  He is not going to replace Rondo, but he would make sure the team doesn't implode because of PG play.

Re: Ainge's next signing should give us a better idea
« Reply #25 on: July 19, 2009, 11:13:21 AM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
Some of you guys are ignoring the fact that players will only be content with a certain amount of playing time. I wouldn't be shocked If Danny just resigned BBD and called it a day. A ten man rotation only works in video games (barely in 2k). Sheed, and Daniels are going to want more than just 10-13 minutes. What we should be looking to pick up are serviceable vets who wouldn't mind riding the pine.

Let's say this is how the minute fall for the starters.
Rondo 36
Ray 35
Pierce 35
Garnet 34
Perkins 28

Assuming this is the starters minutes we have 72 minutes left to go around. 12 behind Rondo, 13 at each wing position, 34 at the PF/C. These guys are going to expect to play a certain amount of minutes, House probably wants 10-15, Daniel 15-20, Sheed 25-30, Baby probably 15-20. After these guys get their minutes their isn't going to be much left, bringing in someone else who is going to demand minutes won't work.

Excellent point.
Not really because Garnett hasn't averaged anywhere near 34 MPG since he has been here, Perk is going to have his numbers limited because of shoulder woes and it's likely with Daniels aboard that Paul and Ray will be slightly lower minutes.

I see more like

KG      30 MPG
Perk    28 MPG
Pierce  34 MPG
Allen   33 MPG
Rondo   36 MPG

I see then that these bench minutes will be available

Sheed   25 MPG
Baby    15 MPG
Daniels 22 MPG
House   12 MPG
Others   5 MPG

This gets everyone good minutes but reasonable minutes and all should be healthy and fresh come playoffs.

Numbers don't add up totally. It assumes we would use a 3 big lineup.
That is right, it does assume that and for 2 minutes a game I think it would be smart.

I kneww someone was going to say the numbers don't add up when in fact, they add up perfectly.

Re: Ainge's next signing should give us a better idea
« Reply #26 on: July 19, 2009, 11:48:52 AM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
I don't get the whole "using Daniels as a PG thing". According to 82games.com he played a little PG in 07-08 when Indiana was desperate because all they had was Denier and Tinsley but other than that he's been a SG or SF.

Let's not confuse being able to handle the ball well with being a team's primary back up PG because he can't do that. Daniels I feel will be a great pick up to do exactly what this team needed which was spell Ray and Paul and still be effective. He's a great pick up in that sense. But this team still needs another big(Baby, Joe Smith, Rasho Nesterovic) and a back up PG.

Outside of take pressure off House with the reserves, he is not the answer for backup PG.  That's why I like a player like Carter.  Able to step in and start for short stretches.  He is not going to replace Rondo, but he would make sure the team doesn't implode because of PG play.
I like Carter and think he would be a great addition. I think Flip Murray would be another as would C J Watson but I hear he is looking Orlando's way

Re: Ainge's next signing should give us a better idea
« Reply #27 on: July 19, 2009, 12:06:38 PM »

Offline P2

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2088
  • Tommy Points: 163
  • Green 18!
After these guys get their minutes their isn't going to be much left, bringing in someone else who is going to demand minutes won't work.

That's why we will probably bring in Lue.

If he's signed he's the backup 4 possibly some backup 5 too.

Ever heard of Rasheed Wallace?

Re: Ainge's next signing should give us a better idea
« Reply #28 on: July 19, 2009, 01:54:51 PM »

Offline Ed Teach

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 448
  • Tommy Points: 8
In my mind I have been hoping that PP and Ray's min are closer to 30min than to 35 min.  I wouldn't mind if the back-ups end up being good enough that we could sit one of the big three for an entire game a few times during the season.

In the playoffs it is a different story, bench mins would go way down.

Re: Ainge's next signing should give us a better idea
« Reply #29 on: July 19, 2009, 01:56:16 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
I'd like if we signed Ime Udoka still very much.

Jason Collins would also be a good edition as our last big.
Udoka would be great to have on the bench.