You loved Scola when he was picked in the 3rd, now you like Brad Slimey Miller more.
How is that public posturing? That's a trade offer you made us, which we turned down. Why would we be insincere? If we thought it made us better, we would have made the trade that you offered us.
But please, continue to not realize that a GM can like or dislike a player depending upon his fit on a certain team.
Hm I asked if you'd move Scola for Brad Miller, Gomes and Dudley for depth purposes. If your going to state the facts, state all them. Scola is much better than Miller, but b/c of depth needs Gomes, who should of been a 5th rounder and Dudley help us.
You're just trying to attack my team and others to avoid the fact that the Blazers would implode in real life.
You're the one who made your offer public.
As we told you, we wouldn't trade Scola for Miller straight up. We're glad you like our players, though.
Flip flopping now on the missing Gomes and Dudley part
Where is the "flip flop"?
I think we're seeing Chicago's GM "pull a Starbury" and melt down publicly. Or, I guess, the continuation of the meltdown, where you blew up a championship contender with your last two trades.
You suggested I was posturing when I said I liked Miller over Scola. I told you that there was no reason for us to posture, because it was a private conversation. Now, you're suggesting something else? What, exactly?
We like Miller over Scola. Period. We told you that, privately, and you decided to make a big deal out of it. That being the case, I'm not sure why we'd add Gomes and Dudley to the package.