0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
People need to look at comments on their team as constructive criticism. The GMS that tell you why they don't like your team are preparing you for the voting at the end of the draft. It's like knowing the questions to the test before the test. If you know what people will say negative about your team at the beginning you can figure out how to counter their argument by the end. Or better yet you can pick players that cover up the pitfalls of your teams.
Quote from: Evantime34 on July 23, 2009, 01:51:08 PMPeople need to look at comments on their team as constructive criticism. The GMS that tell you why they don't like your team are preparing you for the voting at the end of the draft. It's like knowing the questions to the test before the test. If you know what people will say negative about your team at the beginning you can figure out how to counter their argument by the end. Or better yet you can pick players that cover up the pitfalls of your teams.Or you can take it as an insult to your character and intelligence. Whichever.
Quote from: KCattheStripe on July 23, 2009, 01:52:01 PMQuote from: Evantime34 on July 23, 2009, 01:51:08 PMPeople need to look at comments on their team as constructive criticism. The GMS that tell you why they don't like your team are preparing you for the voting at the end of the draft. It's like knowing the questions to the test before the test. If you know what people will say negative about your team at the beginning you can figure out how to counter their argument by the end. Or better yet you can pick players that cover up the pitfalls of your teams.Or you can take it as an insult to your character and intelligence. Whichever.Was that directed at *US* KC?
Quote from: Gainesville Celtic on July 23, 2009, 01:57:12 PMQuote from: KCattheStripe on July 23, 2009, 01:52:01 PMQuote from: Evantime34 on July 23, 2009, 01:51:08 PMPeople need to look at comments on their team as constructive criticism. The GMS that tell you why they don't like your team are preparing you for the voting at the end of the draft. It's like knowing the questions to the test before the test. If you know what people will say negative about your team at the beginning you can figure out how to counter their argument by the end. Or better yet you can pick players that cover up the pitfalls of your teams.Or you can take it as an insult to your character and intelligence. Whichever.Was that directed at *US* KC? Just remember, Tim Duncan is a zombie.
Quote from: KCattheStripe on July 23, 2009, 01:58:56 PMQuote from: Gainesville Celtic on July 23, 2009, 01:57:12 PMQuote from: KCattheStripe on July 23, 2009, 01:52:01 PMQuote from: Evantime34 on July 23, 2009, 01:51:08 PMPeople need to look at comments on their team as constructive criticism. The GMS that tell you why they don't like your team are preparing you for the voting at the end of the draft. It's like knowing the questions to the test before the test. If you know what people will say negative about your team at the beginning you can figure out how to counter their argument by the end. Or better yet you can pick players that cover up the pitfalls of your teams.Or you can take it as an insult to your character and intelligence. Whichever.Was that directed at *US* KC? Just remember, Tim Duncan is a zombie.I'm gonna make him do the thriller dance for every shot he blocks.
Quote from: ChampKind on July 23, 2009, 01:46:02 PMQuote from: Donoghus on July 23, 2009, 01:45:04 PMSuns Send: 4th rounder (16), 6th rounder (24), 11th rounder (17), 10TP'sLas Vegas Sends: 4th rounder (20), 5th rounder (30), 8th rounder (1)Wow, the Flamingos gave up a lot here to move up 4 spots.We may have over payed a bit, but we consider our next pick a very late dropper for his position, he addresses a position of need for us, He's young and desirable to other teams (we hope) and i find the position he pays devoid of talent once he's gone.Thus, i was willing to slightly overpay to guarantee he is mine with the first pick after the break.I would have preferred the pick giving up not be an 8th, but my want of a specific player made it easier to swallow, along with IP's spot as the first pick out of the break, which means the trade will definitely net me my target. other than that, we pretty much traded 6th round picks (i dont consider the last pick in the 5th all that powerful, it's pretty much a 6th round pick already. the 24 spots hurt, but previously i was out of the 6th round entirely due to a previous trade)
Quote from: Donoghus on July 23, 2009, 01:45:04 PMSuns Send: 4th rounder (16), 6th rounder (24), 11th rounder (17), 10TP'sLas Vegas Sends: 4th rounder (20), 5th rounder (30), 8th rounder (1)Wow, the Flamingos gave up a lot here to move up 4 spots.
Suns Send: 4th rounder (16), 6th rounder (24), 11th rounder (17), 10TP'sLas Vegas Sends: 4th rounder (20), 5th rounder (30), 8th rounder (1)
Quote from: crownsy on July 23, 2009, 01:50:00 PMQuote from: ChampKind on July 23, 2009, 01:46:02 PMQuote from: Donoghus on July 23, 2009, 01:45:04 PMSuns Send: 4th rounder (16), 6th rounder (24), 11th rounder (17), 10TP'sLas Vegas Sends: 4th rounder (20), 5th rounder (30), 8th rounder (1)Wow, the Flamingos gave up a lot here to move up 4 spots.We may have over payed a bit, but we consider our next pick a very late dropper for his position, he addresses a position of need for us, He's young and desirable to other teams (we hope) and i find the position he pays devoid of talent once he's gone.Thus, i was willing to slightly overpay to guarantee he is mine with the first pick after the break.I would have preferred the pick giving up not be an 8th, but my want of a specific player made it easier to swallow, along with IP's spot as the first pick out of the break, which means the trade will definitely net me my target. other than that, we pretty much traded 6th round picks (i dont consider the last pick in the 5th all that powerful, it's pretty much a 6th round pick already. the 24 spots hurt, but previously i was out of the 6th round entirely due to a previous trade)I think I can guess who you were targeting, and if that's the case, yes, I understand why you liked him. We considered him at #15, but liked Hawes better.
Quote from: Roy Hobbs on July 23, 2009, 02:02:18 PMQuote from: crownsy on July 23, 2009, 01:50:00 PMQuote from: ChampKind on July 23, 2009, 01:46:02 PMQuote from: Donoghus on July 23, 2009, 01:45:04 PMSuns Send: 4th rounder (16), 6th rounder (24), 11th rounder (17), 10TP'sLas Vegas Sends: 4th rounder (20), 5th rounder (30), 8th rounder (1)Wow, the Flamingos gave up a lot here to move up 4 spots.We may have over payed a bit, but we consider our next pick a very late dropper for his position, he addresses a position of need for us, He's young and desirable to other teams (we hope) and i find the position he pays devoid of talent once he's gone.Thus, i was willing to slightly overpay to guarantee he is mine with the first pick after the break.I would have preferred the pick giving up not be an 8th, but my want of a specific player made it easier to swallow, along with IP's spot as the first pick out of the break, which means the trade will definitely net me my target. other than that, we pretty much traded 6th round picks (i dont consider the last pick in the 5th all that powerful, it's pretty much a 6th round pick already. the 24 spots hurt, but previously i was out of the 6th round entirely due to a previous trade)I think I can guess who you were targeting, and if that's the case, yes, I understand why you liked him. We considered him at #15, but liked Hawes better.Yeah, I think I understand who Crownsy is targeting as well - if its the right guy, I think its a very solid pick.