I hope this rumor is not true.
- 35 yeras old (We are always older, older, older and older)
- Bad 2008/2009 statistics: 6,5 pts in playoff
- Injury prone: 66 games played last year, missed 16
- Full MLE for sheed? It's a wrong move
We are getting older, and older, and older, and...
So what equivelent talented player will you be signing for the MLE then?
We already have enough talent on this team. What we need is the right pieces around our talent. Marbury has a lot of talent, but he played like crap (except for 5 minutes in the playoffs, where he was good, offensively). You need a completely different mind-set as a role-player than as the star of your team, and considering Rasheed´s play in the last 2 1/2 years, I seriously doubt his ability to adjust.
Sheed is done. If our big three would be 3 years younger, or if Wallace would be three years younger, I´d love this move. But they aren´t.
There are ~1000 big men in europe who can hit the three. I bet most of them are more athletic than a 35-year-old Wallace, and many of them would kill to be the backup on the Celtics.
I am completely opposed to the Sheed idea, and I´m one of the guys who really likes his personality. You can´t see our team or Sheed in a vacuum, this is about synergy effects. Even if he could be half the player he was three years ago: we´re talking about a 35-year-old former all-star backing up a 32-year old all-star coming off injury and a 25-year old Center with a history of shoulder issues.
It is not true that we were "too young" after KG went down, no matter what Doc says.
Walker, Giddens and Pruitt didn´t play. Our rotation was Perk, Baby, Pierce, Ray, Rondo, Marbury, House, Moore, Scal. 6 out of 9 were over 30, Perk played 6 years in the NBA! And Doc says we have a "lack of leadership"? Ridiculous. If there´s anyone to blame for a lack of leadership, it´s Doc.
This team isn´t too young, it is too old. Adding Sheed and maybe even Hill is insane.
I want a seasoned vet on the bench as well, but he should be 28-31, not beyond 35.