Author Topic: Quinton Ross anyone?  (Read 5835 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Quinton Ross anyone?
« Reply #15 on: June 16, 2009, 08:27:31 PM »

Offline Chris

  • Global Moderator
  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18008
  • Tommy Points: 642
I like Ross as the second wing off the bench.

Exactly.  If they are bringing him in as a 10th man, fine, but I would be very disapointed if he ends up being the first wing off the bench.

Re: Quinton Ross anyone?
« Reply #16 on: June 16, 2009, 08:40:02 PM »

Offline winsomme

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6058
  • Tommy Points: 255
Ross seems to be yet another SG who can play minutes at SF. He's a decent player, but I'd rather see Walker getting any minutes that would go his way.

don't really see him as a backup for Paul. Paul may only be 6'6", but he has a really big wingspan and he is wide and solid. Pierce probably has 30 lbs on Ross.

i don't agree with the minimum height req being 6'6". I'd like it to be prefereably - at least 6'8" and someone that can get some minutes at PF as well.

Re: Quinton Ross anyone?
« Reply #17 on: June 16, 2009, 08:42:06 PM »

Offline PosImpos

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12383
  • Tommy Points: 903
  • Rondo = Good
Ross seems to be yet another SG who can play minutes at SF. He's a decent player, but I'd rather see Walker getting any minutes that would go his way.

don't really see him as a backup for Paul. Paul may only be 6'6", but he has a really big wingspan and he is wide and solid. Pierce probably has 30 lbs on Ross.

i don't agree with the minimum height req being 6'6". I'd like it to be prefereably - at least 6'8" and someone that can get some minutes at PF as well.

Yeah, I agree with that, ideally we'd get someone bigger.

6'6'' is good for a defensive stopper at SG (Pietrus) but it seems to me that usually the best defensive guys at SF are guys who are long and tall for the position (Tayshaun, Posey, Battier etc).
Never forget the Champs of '08, or the gutsy warriors of '10.

"I know you all wanna win, but you gotta do it TOGETHER!"
- Doc Rivers

Re: Quinton Ross anyone?
« Reply #18 on: June 16, 2009, 08:43:23 PM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34114
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
I like Ross as the second wing off the bench.

Exactly.  If they are bringing him in as a 10th man, fine, but I would be very disapointed if he ends up being the first wing off the bench.

True.

But him as the 1st swingman off the bench this past season would have been an upgrade.

Re: Quinton Ross anyone?
« Reply #19 on: June 16, 2009, 08:45:14 PM »

Offline PosImpos

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12383
  • Tommy Points: 903
  • Rondo = Good
I like Ross as the second wing off the bench.

Exactly.  If they are bringing him in as a 10th man, fine, but I would be very disapointed if he ends up being the first wing off the bench.

True.

But him as the 1st swingman off the bench this past season would have been an upgrade.

Sadly, yes.  We really didn't have a backup SF on our team this last season.  The result should be evident to pretty much anyone at this point.
Never forget the Champs of '08, or the gutsy warriors of '10.

"I know you all wanna win, but you gotta do it TOGETHER!"
- Doc Rivers

Re: Quinton Ross anyone?
« Reply #20 on: June 16, 2009, 09:01:29 PM »

Offline Jon

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6500
  • Tommy Points: 385
I prefer him to what we have.  I would like someone who can knock the three down better and was a little longer (cough, cough, James Posey).  I could live with him.  However, he'd be a waste of a roster spot if we only wanted him to be the second wing off the bench.  On a team with All Stars at the 2 and 3, the second wing off the bench doesn't see much time.  Tony Allen or one of the young guys can fill that role (and the 5 minutes of time it requires per game). 

Re: Quinton Ross anyone?
« Reply #21 on: June 16, 2009, 09:04:41 PM »

Offline winsomme

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6058
  • Tommy Points: 255
I like Ross as the second wing off the bench.

Exactly.  If they are bringing him in as a 10th man, fine, but I would be very disapointed if he ends up being the first wing off the bench.

True.

But him as the 1st swingman off the bench this past season would have been an upgrade.

why's that the measuring stick, though...?

Re: Quinton Ross anyone?
« Reply #22 on: June 16, 2009, 09:24:38 PM »

Offline PosImpos

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12383
  • Tommy Points: 903
  • Rondo = Good
I like Ross as the second wing off the bench.

Exactly.  If they are bringing him in as a 10th man, fine, but I would be very disapointed if he ends up being the first wing off the bench.

True.

But him as the 1st swingman off the bench this past season would have been an upgrade.

why's that the measuring stick, though...?

I guess the point is the least we could do is get Ross, though we really have to do more than just that in order to fortify our bench at the 2 / 3 positions.
Never forget the Champs of '08, or the gutsy warriors of '10.

"I know you all wanna win, but you gotta do it TOGETHER!"
- Doc Rivers

Re: Quinton Ross anyone?
« Reply #23 on: June 16, 2009, 09:47:17 PM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
I like Ross as the second wing off the bench.

Exactly.  If they are bringing him in as a 10th man, fine, but I would be very disapointed if he ends up being the first wing off the bench.

True.

But him as the 1st swingman off the bench this past season would have been an upgrade.

 Probably not. If Allen had played a little smarter but only scored 3-4 points a game I don't think that people would have been too thrilled.

Re: Quinton Ross anyone?
« Reply #24 on: June 16, 2009, 09:58:22 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32877
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
i for one am done with tony allen

Re: Quinton Ross anyone?
« Reply #25 on: June 16, 2009, 10:13:27 PM »

Offline CelticWes34

  • Payton Pritchard
  • Posts: 121
  • Tommy Points: 20
The past couple years I have been a Quinton Ross fan... Bring him on board and get rid of Tony Allen!!

Amen to that! Ross is a very good player who would fit in easily with the team. It also sounds like he would be a favorite of Doc's as well.
Carl: And, technically, he's supposed to be spayed, and uh, he ain't that. I know that first hand. Go ahead, ask me how I know. Go ahead. Ask me. Ask me how I know.

Re: Quinton Ross anyone?
« Reply #26 on: June 16, 2009, 11:21:14 PM »

Offline snively

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
  • Tommy Points: 458
I like Ross as the second wing off the bench.

Exactly.  If they are bringing him in as a 10th man, fine, but I would be very disapointed if he ends up being the first wing off the bench.

I think he'd be fine as the first wing off the bench provided we also strengthened the bench elsewhere.  From ownership's perspective a bargain bin upgrade like Ross would make a splurge for McDyess, Sheed, ZaZa or Gortat more palatable.

It's also more realistic not to expect to add impact players at the back-up wing and the back-up big positions with just the MLE and the LLE.  It's not as if we're so far off that we need such dramatic upgrades anyways.

Q Ross could do nice work in 10-15 minutes off the bench for Pierce.
2016 CelticsBlog Draft: Chicago Bulls

Head Coach: Fred Hoiberg

Starters: Rubio, Danny Green, Durant, Markieff Morris, Capela
Bench: Sessions, Shumpert, G. Green, T. Booker, Frye
Deep Bench: CJ Watson, H. Thompson, P. Zipser, Papagiannis, Mejri

Re: Quinton Ross anyone?
« Reply #27 on: June 17, 2009, 09:34:20 PM »

Offline Ed Teach

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 448
  • Tommy Points: 8
I think what matters is the combination of players the Celtics pick up for the bench.
I am fine with Q Ross, if it is combined with McDyess and another big name FA.
If Q Ross is the biggest move made, then it will be a disappointing off season.

Re: Quinton Ross anyone?
« Reply #28 on: June 17, 2009, 10:13:36 PM »

Offline jambr380

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13751
  • Tommy Points: 2061
  • Sometimes there's no sane reason for optimism
Does Q. Ross really have his own highlights video? Do I have my own video out there?

Hey, if it is determined that he would make a great back up to Pierce, then I am all for it, but I guess I don't know enough about the guy (except I have heard his name a few times).

Re: Quinton Ross anyone?
« Reply #29 on: June 17, 2009, 10:35:57 PM »

Offline billysan

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3875
  • Tommy Points: 178
  He might be a decent defender but he seems practically non-existent when I've seen him play. Kind of like having a Scals for a sf. The best thing you can say about him is that he isn't TA.
Ditto, what you said.

There is a reason (actually several) that he is a low end salaried guy who always seems to be available. He just isnt that good. We already have one of those in Mr. Tony Allen.

He's better then Tony Allen. I think the only reason the C's kept him, is because Doc wanted some wing continuity on the bench from 08 to 09.

I agree he is better than Tony Allen, but he's just not that much better. Just a matter of opinion I guess. He still is an 9-10th (IMO) situational defense rotation guy who is pretty much limited to playing SG. We need a longer, more versatile wing as a 6-7 man off the bench. I dont see him being any more valuable (than Tony Allen) to guarding a SF like Turkoglu, Prince or Carmelo Anthony, let alone Lebron James.
"First fix their hearts" -Eizo Shimabuku