My brother constantly tells me that it was a mistake to trade away Patrick O'Bryant. He says that he had the skills to do what back-up centers are supposed to do - rebound, block shots, run the court and play some D.
I always counter his argument with the fact that it really doesn't matter much because even if that is true - we wouldn't find out because doc simply doesn't play younger players unless he is forced to.
POB didn't play much and so most people think that he sucks - a "stiff" so to speak. Well, I decided to look at his numbers this year - especially what he may or may not have done with Toronto. What I found intriguing was his last 3 games of the season.
W 109-98 @CHI 27 min, 4-9 fg, 3 off, 4 def, 7 reb, 1 stl, 3 blk, 9 pts
W 97-96 @WAS 21 min, 4-10 , 0 off, 1 def, 1 reb, 2 stl, 2 blk, 8 pts
W111-104vsPHI 18 min, 5-7 fg, 2 off, 3 def, 5 reb, 0 stl, 2 blks, 10 pts
Is it possible that this 7 footer was a guy who if doc had chosen to play him more and try to develop him could have helped us this year or in the future? We needed more length in the front court. Could he have been it?
I wish that coaches like doc were not so addicted to playing vets. When I see other teams with players like Orlando's Courtney Lee, I say to myself that guy wouldn't even be on the floor with the Celtics, but on Orlando, the number 3 seed in the east, he is averaging 27 mpg in the playoffs.
Come on doc! you got to use your young players more. Take some chances during the regular season and play them - the sky won't fall if you do
