Author Topic: Celtics (50-17) at Bulls (30-37) 3/17  (Read 102063 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (50-17) at Bulls (30-37) 3/17
« Reply #315 on: March 17, 2009, 11:13:30 PM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
Marbury in for Defense!
Marbury is in because we need a three-pointer and have no timeouts.
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."

Re: Celtics (50-17) at Bulls (30-37) 3/17
« Reply #316 on: March 17, 2009, 11:13:38 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
Stop. Score. Stop Score. Celtics win.

Re: Celtics (50-17) at Bulls (30-37) 3/17
« Reply #317 on: March 17, 2009, 11:13:41 PM »

Offline greg683x

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4198
  • Tommy Points: 593
I smell OT

lol i hope not, i have work at 6am and this is just an awful basketball game.
Greg

Re: Celtics (50-17) at Bulls (30-37) 3/17
« Reply #318 on: March 17, 2009, 11:13:51 PM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
were gna lose to the team with the worst chemistry in the league

Do you even understand the game of basketball? Do you understand that the Celtics are missing half their players? Do you understand that they have one guy available who is taller than 6-7? Do you know that The Bulls blew out New Orleans the other night by 30 points? My guess is the answer to all of these questions is NO.

Re: Celtics (50-17) at Bulls (30-37) 3/17
« Reply #319 on: March 17, 2009, 11:14:18 PM »

Offline mahonedog88

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2194
  • Tommy Points: 119
I understand our defense isnt as good without KG, but 122 points and counting to the Bulls? Really?

Re: Celtics (50-17) at Bulls (30-37) 3/17
« Reply #320 on: March 17, 2009, 11:15:02 PM »

Offline Redz

  • Punner
  • Global Moderator
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31770
  • Tommy Points: 3847
  • Yup
Marbury in for Defense!
Marbury is in because we need a three-pointer and have no timeouts.

good point

TP

needed THAT board

crap
Yup

Re: Celtics (50-17) at Bulls (30-37) 3/17
« Reply #321 on: March 17, 2009, 11:15:08 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32884
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
were gna lose to the team with the worst chemistry in the league

Do you even understand the game of basketball? Do you understand that the Celtics are missing half their players? Do you understand that they have one guy available who is taller than 6-7? Do you know that The Bulls blew out New Orleans the other night by 30 points? My guess is the answer to all of these questions is NO.

i think losing the big third quarter lead has frustrated a lot

Re: Celtics (50-17) at Bulls (30-37) 3/17
« Reply #322 on: March 17, 2009, 11:15:19 PM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
I understand our defense isnt as good without KG, but 122 points and counting to the Bulls? Really?

We have one guy over 6-7. ONE. ONE! I give up. If the Celtics had one guy on the floor you guys would still be complaining.

Re: Celtics (50-17) at Bulls (30-37) 3/17
« Reply #323 on: March 17, 2009, 11:15:26 PM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34116
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
No rebounder



Good stop.  


No rebounder

Re: Celtics (50-17) at Bulls (30-37) 3/17
« Reply #324 on: March 17, 2009, 11:15:54 PM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34116
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
And they did have a TO

Re: Celtics (50-17) at Bulls (30-37) 3/17
« Reply #325 on: March 17, 2009, 11:16:31 PM »

Offline greg683x

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4198
  • Tommy Points: 593
I understand our defense isnt as good without KG, but 122 points and counting to the Bulls? Really?

you forgot to write Powe, BBD, TA, Scal after KG. and yes. Really.
Greg

Re: Celtics (50-17) at Bulls (30-37) 3/17
« Reply #326 on: March 17, 2009, 11:16:52 PM »

Offline Redz

  • Punner
  • Global Moderator
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31770
  • Tommy Points: 3847
  • Yup
boooooooooooo
Yup

Re: Celtics (50-17) at Bulls (30-37) 3/17
« Reply #327 on: March 17, 2009, 11:16:55 PM »

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21259
  • Tommy Points: 2451
Brad Miller looks good in green. Maybe he'll want to play in Boston next year?


This ref needs to be thrown in that green river!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Celtics (50-17) at Bulls (30-37) 3/17
« Reply #328 on: March 17, 2009, 11:17:03 PM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34116
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
Wow.



You have to be kidding me.

Re: Celtics (50-17) at Bulls (30-37) 3/17
« Reply #329 on: March 17, 2009, 11:17:21 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
Tommy going off.

Frustrating loss.  I guess you can't expect wins when you're missing your top four PFs.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions