Author Topic: Celtics (50-16) at Bucks (30-38) 3/15  (Read 51498 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (50-16) at Bucks (30-38) 3/15
« Reply #165 on: March 15, 2009, 04:03:36 PM »

Offline RAcker

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3892
  • Tommy Points: 69
  • Law mercy!
Paul Pierce had zero heart today.  There I said it.  He played like he just woke up from a nap.

And girl teams make better passes than we do.  Ray and Rajon and everyone else put their passing panties on for this game today. Lazy wastes of flesh they were out there today.  It just makes me sick to watch guys dressed in the green play like this.

If you can't tell, I'm disgusted.  Perk is the only "man" that showed up.  Leon looked like he's been too busy reading his own praises to pay attention to this opponent. 

Can KG help this?  I surely hope so, because "the captain" looks like he stepped back to 2 years ago today.  I'm going to go punch something and then take a nap.

Re: Celtics (50-16) at Bucks (30-38) 3/15
« Reply #166 on: March 15, 2009, 04:05:58 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32884
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
i agree RAcker...they looked uninterested the entire game. i don;t like the mentality that they can show up whenever and win....this is the SAME team that ran the cavs off the floor....and against memphis, today, the heat they don't bother coming in with energy. this is a poor team right now and they better get right or the playoffs will be a short run

Re: Celtics (50-16) at Bucks (30-38) 3/15
« Reply #167 on: March 15, 2009, 04:09:42 PM »

Offline RAcker

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3892
  • Tommy Points: 69
  • Law mercy!
Seriously, I've seen guys in pickup games take better care of the ball and play harder.  That is sickening.

Re: Celtics (50-16) at Bucks (30-38) 3/15
« Reply #168 on: March 15, 2009, 04:12:46 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32884
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
last year they were just driven..this year you can tell they play when they want....i mean the cavs down 19 and 14 on a west coast trip in the 4th quarter against BAD teams...they could have easily mailed it in....but they didn't...they dug deep and beat the clippers and kings....boston on the other hand just loses games because it looks like they don't even care

Re: Celtics (50-16) at Bucks (30-38) 3/15
« Reply #169 on: March 15, 2009, 04:15:00 PM »

Offline RAcker

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3892
  • Tommy Points: 69
  • Law mercy!
last year they were just driven..this year you can tell they play when they want....i mean the cavs down 19 and 14 on a west coast trip in the 4th quarter against BAD teams...they could have easily mailed it in....but they didn't...they dug deep and beat the clippers and kings....boston on the other hand just loses games because it looks like they don't even care

You and I need to meet up somewhere in the panhandle and blow some stuff up.  I haven't been this angry over a ball game since Alabama got punked by Utah in the Sugar Bowl.

Re: Celtics (50-16) at Bucks (30-38) 3/15
« Reply #170 on: March 15, 2009, 04:16:56 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32884
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
last year they were just driven..this year you can tell they play when they want....i mean the cavs down 19 and 14 on a west coast trip in the 4th quarter against BAD teams...they could have easily mailed it in....but they didn't...they dug deep and beat the clippers and kings....boston on the other hand just loses games because it looks like they don't even care

You and I need to meet up somewhere in the panhandle and blow some stuff up.  I haven't been this angry over a ball game since Alabama got punked by Utah in the Sugar Bowl.

try being an ohio state grad like me...2 national championships in football and one in hoops i had to suffer through....then the gut wrenching loss to texas in this year's fiesta bowl....i am bitter....frustrated...p---ed and to top it off i work with cleveland cav fans......

Re: Celtics (50-16) at Bucks (30-38) 3/15
« Reply #171 on: March 15, 2009, 04:23:08 PM »

Offline RAcker

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3892
  • Tommy Points: 69
  • Law mercy!
last year they were just driven..this year you can tell they play when they want....i mean the cavs down 19 and 14 on a west coast trip in the 4th quarter against BAD teams...they could have easily mailed it in....but they didn't...they dug deep and beat the clippers and kings....boston on the other hand just loses games because it looks like they don't even care

You and I need to meet up somewhere in the panhandle and blow some stuff up.  I haven't been this angry over a ball game since Alabama got punked by Utah in the Sugar Bowl.

try being an ohio state grad like me...2 national championships in football and one in hoops i had to suffer through....then the gut wrenching loss to texas in this year's fiesta bowl....i am bitter....frustrated...****ed and to top it off i work with cleveland cav fans......
Well, a TP to you for not snuffing yourself yet.

Re: Celtics (50-16) at Bucks (30-38) 3/15
« Reply #172 on: March 15, 2009, 04:25:42 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32884
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
last year they were just driven..this year you can tell they play when they want....i mean the cavs down 19 and 14 on a west coast trip in the 4th quarter against BAD teams...they could have easily mailed it in....but they didn't...they dug deep and beat the clippers and kings....boston on the other hand just loses games because it looks like they don't even care

trust me...i have been in the car on the way to a bridge several times....boston wining it last year kept me sane

You and I need to meet up somewhere in the panhandle and blow some stuff up.  I haven't been this angry over a ball game since Alabama got punked by Utah in the Sugar Bowl.

try being an ohio state grad like me...2 national championships in football and one in hoops i had to suffer through....then the gut wrenching loss to texas in this year's fiesta bowl....i am bitter....frustrated...****ed and to top it off i work with cleveland cav fans......
Well, a TP for you for not snuffing yourself yet.

boston wining it last year kept me sane

Re: Celtics (50-16) at Bucks (30-38) 3/15
« Reply #173 on: March 15, 2009, 04:29:35 PM »

Offline twinbree

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2670
  • Tommy Points: 170
Glad I decided to skip this game to avoid another closely contested game with a losing team. Truth is this team doesn't care about winning homecourt so neither should I. The recent back to back performances against Nuggets/Clippers and Cavs/Magic has convinced me every game doesn't matter to them the way it should for a team chasing the top record.
The good thing is when they decide to show up they get the job done so I'm not too worried about the playoffs.
Tommy: He's got a line about me. Tell him the line.

Mike: Everybody 60 or over knows Tommy as a player. Everybody 40 or over knows Tommy as a coach. Everybody 20 or over knows Tommy as a broadcaster. And everybody 10 or under thinks he's Shrek.

Re: Celtics (50-16) at Bucks (30-38) 3/15
« Reply #174 on: March 15, 2009, 04:38:44 PM »

Offline Cman

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13074
  • Tommy Points: 121
Positives about losing:

(1) It sounds like everyone posting on celticsblog.com is in agreement!  We don't have to argue about Mikki or Joe, BBD or Powe, Walker or Giddens, we can all just agree that the current situation sucks.

(2) The only pick we have in the draft will now be around #57 or #58, instead of #59 or #60.

Notable players picked #57-60: Manu Ginobili, Luis Scola (okay, he was #56)...
Celtics fan for life.

Re: Celtics (50-16) at Bucks (30-38) 3/15
« Reply #175 on: March 15, 2009, 04:38:51 PM »

Offline BUTerrier

  • Joe Mazzulla
  • Posts: 141
  • Tommy Points: 53
Having just got back from sitting in a sea of Bucks fans 6 rows up at the Bradley Center, I've got to say the following (and I'm sorry if this repeats anything anyone else said):

1.) Moore actually looked really solid out there. He was hitting the shots he needed to hit, rotating well defensively (though he wasn't perfect in that respect) and doing a hell of a lot more on the court than I expected him to do.

2.) I wasn't crazy about Marbury before I saw him today, but now? I HATE him. There were at least 5 occasions in the second half (I stopped counting after a while) where all he had to do was just turn around and face the guy and he would have disrupted the play perfectly. It wasn't even that he hogged the ball (though I admit a couple of his baskets had me wincing); it was that he would over-dribble and put himself in a corner where he couldn't pass out of it. Putting him in at SG is a terrible idea; either he is a PG, or he rides the bench. He and Rondo can't be out there together.

3.) Pierce was struggling far too much today. I think he reverted a bit into his "I've got to carry the team" mode from pre-GPA days, and I think he took more than a few shots where, had he passed it out after drawing the double, he could have found an open man. I'd have liked to see him get House and Allen more involved in the game, though I concede neither of those two were knocking it down all that well.

4.) What can I say? Perk kept us in the game for most of it. He ran his mouth a bit too much, and he went ice-cold for a stretch during the second quarter, but the Bucks didn't have much of an answer for him all game.

5.) I knew the Celts would miss KG, but I didn't realize how much their defense suffered without him. It was like the team was playing JV out there; that Mbah-a-Moute dunk down the lane should NEVER have happened. They just looked incredibly sloppy on defense, and I honestly believe they could have won if it wasn't for the 3 or 4 consecutive lapses they had in the third quarter. But when you keep leaving Ridnour et al. wide open on the arc to take threes, you're going to lose.

6.) Even though most of the calls were going the Celtics' way, I have to be honest: the officiating was TERRIBLE. I was astounded. They were calling traveling violations on both teams at random points completely unrelated to whether there actually WAS traveling. Plus, the refs were ignoring Pierce and Perkins getting slammed in the face while calling fouls on Bucks players for just being within a foot or two of a Celtic (and I'm talking about the kind of phantom foul calls that even die-hard Celtic fans have to begrudgingly admit are ridiculous). If the NBA doesn't get this reffing system fixed, and I mean pronto, people are going to start viewing the NBA like the WWF.

Those are my thoughts. Also, as off-topic as this is, I'm asking those of you who are reading this to keep my buddy who was supposed to go with me today in your thoughts. I had two seats today, and I missed the tip-off and the first 2 1/2 minutes of the first because I was sitting there calling my buddy's cell phone and waiting outside his place for him to get out. Finally, at 10 minutes before tip-off (I live on a back route to the Bradley Center) I gave up and just drove in to the arena to watch the game solo. It wasn't until my drive back that I got a text from a mutual friend telling me that my buddy had gotten jacked last night on his way home from the bar, had all his money and his phone taken, and had just gotten out of the hospital at around 2 p.m. CST today to go home and rest. I stopped at his place en route to home, and luckily he's got no broken bones or anything, but they worked him over pretty good. So, yeah; not a lot of joy here for me today.

Re: Celtics (50-16) at Bucks (30-38) 3/15
« Reply #176 on: March 15, 2009, 05:10:56 PM »

Offline rgreen165

  • Lonnie Walker IV
  • Posts: 63
  • Tommy Points: 14
i swear i hate day games, especially when it goes like this. it puts a damper on the rest of the day. guess i'll go throw in some COD: World at War and take out my aggression in some deathmatch

Re: Celtics (50-16) at Bucks (30-38) 3/15
« Reply #177 on: March 15, 2009, 05:47:29 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32884
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
i guess since the celtics and doc don't care about any home court or seeding we should all stop worrying about it also

Re: Celtics (50-16) at Bucks (30-38) 3/15
« Reply #178 on: March 15, 2009, 06:26:57 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
i guess since the celtics and doc don't care about any home court or seeding we should all stop worrying about it also
Don't care? Playing poorly doesn't equal not caring, especially missing 4 rotation players still.

Re: Celtics (50-16) at Bucks (30-38) 3/15
« Reply #179 on: March 15, 2009, 07:03:37 PM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32884
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
i guess since the celtics and doc don't care about any home court or seeding we should all stop worrying about it also
Don't care? Playing poorly doesn't equal not caring, especially missing 4 rotation players still.

come on...they went through the motions today