I dont understand why Ray is always compared to Reggie Miller and why Miller is always held to such a high esteem in people's minds.
I always see people bringing up Reggie as somebody that Ray should be trying to be and live up to in terms of a career. To me, it doesnt even seem like a contest. Ray is a vastly superior player in nearly all facets of the game. He is much more athletic, or was in terms of valuing them in their primes. He puts the ball on the floor, actually goes to the hoop. He is a better passer, finisher, rebounder, defender, and honestly, if you go by the numbers...3 point shooter. He takes, makes, and shoots a higher percentage.
Reggie always got away with very dirty tricks and tactics. His patented kicking his leg out to create contact is essentially a form of flopping. Ray doesnt do any of that.
Rip often gets compared to Reggie, and I can see that. Both fairly dirty players who get by on "craftyness" if you want to call it that. Basically grabbing and clawing the whole way through the game trying to see how much they can get away with.
Ray Allen seems like a much different player than both of them. The only Reggie comparison i see, is they play the same position and are great 3 point shooters. Ray also gets compared with Rip and I think the only similarities again are the fact they play 2 guard and went to UConn.
All 3 are great without the ball and moving around screens, but after that, the comparisons dont really make sense. Once Ray loses more athleticism, i can see him adopting more of a Reggie Miller type game and succeeding in that role, however, that was Reggie Miller's game his whole career, not just when he got old. Just as it is Rip's game.