Author Topic: Walker and Giddens, Again.  (Read 16598 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Walker and Giddens, Again.
« on: February 26, 2009, 10:56:44 PM »

Offline billysan

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3875
  • Tommy Points: 178
Now that Paul Pierce has an injured thumb. Now that Brian Scalabrine has been sent back to have a Dr evaluate his latest injury. We still are missing KG and Tony Allen for the foreseeable future. Now that Gabe Pruitt is caught driving over the legal limit.


Is there any hope and prayer that Doc will find a few more minutes for Bill Walker and J.R. Giddens? Will Doc just continue to play Paul injured and Ray Allen too many minutes? Will he give Pruitt a pass and let him get more minutes instead?


We have two new roster additions that are likely going to get more minutes in Fridays game than Walker and Giddens. How is it that these two new guys 'know our system better' is the excuse I just cant wait to hear. Dont get me wrong, I like the idea of Mikki Moore and Starbury coming off our bench. It just has nothing to do with playing time at the wings, does it?
"First fix their hearts" -Eizo Shimabuku

Re: Walker and Giddens, Again.
« Reply #1 on: February 26, 2009, 11:16:17 PM »

Offline Change

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6666
  • Tommy Points: 544
lol,
We talk alot about Walker, I would love to see JR play again. Dude can play. He adds the athletic dimension that we lack in the backcourt. He needs to control his nerves just a little bit. Plus i'm still waiting for walkers coming out party. Its nice to have two young players that actually have talent.

You know what I'm becoming angry, we have two players that can give us a lift and rest PP/Ray but can't buy a minute. Give them a break just one time coach. Dam you Doc! Players coach my butt. 

Re: Walker and Giddens, Again.
« Reply #2 on: February 26, 2009, 11:21:32 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
If and only if Ray, Paul, Scal Tony and Marbury are out will we ever see meaningful real minutes from either of those guys. And really, considering that we are in a home court battle with Cleveland, the last 20 games of the season as the C's run towards the finish line are not the time to be experimenting with them.

They will have their chances here next year or somewhere else if they are dealt. This year only expect them in tiny short stretches or during absolute blowouts.

Re: Walker and Giddens, Again.
« Reply #3 on: February 26, 2009, 11:32:36 PM »

Offline yall hate

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3462
  • Tommy Points: 55
they may have potential, but neither have a whole lot to offer this team right now.

Marbury, having not played in over a year is likely able to understand and execute a play that doc draws up in a timeout better then jr and walker.  thats not a knock on them.  they will hopefully get there at some point, but right now they are clueless.

Re: Walker and Giddens, Again.
« Reply #4 on: February 27, 2009, 12:29:32 AM »

Offline gar

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2629
  • Tommy Points: 247
  • Strength from Within
Pruitt, Giddens and especially Walker all had turnover issues in D league. May come with the territory; but nothing can take the momentum out of a team more than a few poorly timed turnovers.

Re: Walker and Giddens, Again.
« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2009, 01:57:24 AM »

Offline Atzar

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10243
  • Tommy Points: 1893
Pruitt, Giddens and especially Walker all had turnover issues in D league. May come with the territory; but nothing can take the momentum out of a team more than a few poorly timed turnovers.


Pruitt and Walker had turnover problems, but I seem to remember Giddens doing alright in that department.

they may have potential, but neither have a whole lot to offer this team right now.

Marbury, having not played in over a year is likely able to understand and execute a play that doc draws up in a timeout better then jr and walker.  thats not a knock on them.  they will hopefully get there at some point, but right now they are clueless.

I'm going to go ahead and disagree with this statement.  I think they can offer the team a backup 3 through the rest of the regular season.  And in an emergency in the playoffs, I'd rather have Billy or JR thrown in the fire with some significant regular season minutes than with nothing but garbage time under their belts. 

I think Doc really needs to show some foresight here - with the lack of proven depth at the small forward position on this team, Doc needs to figure out whether either of these guys has it in them to step up in a real game, not in practice.  There is a very real possibility that neither TA nor Scal can go in the playoffs, and if that's the case we have nobody who can spell Paul on LeBron.  It's entirely within the realm of possibility that we're left with no other choice and one of the rookies has to see some playoff minutes, and I think Doc really needs to recognize that now and try to prepare them for that scenario.

Re: Walker and Giddens, Again.
« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2009, 08:13:15 AM »

Offline slamtheking

  • NCE
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32316
  • Tommy Points: 10098
Doc has never played young players unless forced into it due to injuries.  NEVER.  Think back through all the players and you won't find one that Doc put on the court unless he had to: Al, Perk, Rondo, Gomes, Powe, BBD...  Everyone of them could play but couldn't get on the court until Doc had no choice.  Once there, they showed the fans were right to call for them to get the PT to show they could play.

I've have difficulty understanding why some people here support Doc's judgement concerning young player's abilities and saying they're not ready to contribute on the court --> he has a poor track record of judging a young player's ability to contribute. 

At this point in the season, I understand the team's need to wrap up a high seed (HCA is extremely optimistic at this point) but burning out PP and Ray is only going to cost us in the playoffs.  Giving Walker/Giddens 5-8 minutes of PT while we're down some players can only help PP and Ray retain some energy both for the current games and the playoffs.

Re: Walker and Giddens, Again.
« Reply #7 on: February 27, 2009, 08:20:03 AM »

Offline winsomme

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6058
  • Tommy Points: 255
I'm not sure exactly how they are going to do it, but i expect the bench to not go much past:

House
Steph
Powe
Moore

with Baby starting until Scals and/or KG comes back....

I just feel like they are going to try and give Steph a ton of minutes here to get him acclimated.

personally, I don't know how we get through the playoffs without a back up wing to play some defense, but i just can't see Walker or Giddens getting minutes.

I'd love to see it, though. preferably Walker.

Re: Walker and Giddens, Again.
« Reply #8 on: February 27, 2009, 08:22:43 AM »

Offline winsomme

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6058
  • Tommy Points: 255
If and only if Ray, Paul, Scal Tony and Marbury are out will we ever see meaningful real minutes from either of those guys. And really, considering that we are in a home court battle with Cleveland, the last 20 games of the season as the C's run towards the finish line are not the time to be experimenting with them.

They will have their chances here next year or somewhere else if they are dealt. This year only expect them in tiny short stretches or during absolute blowouts.

nick, what do you think they are going to do with LeBron? Who give Pierce a break from guarding him?

Re: Walker and Giddens, Again.
« Reply #9 on: February 27, 2009, 10:02:01 AM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
Doc has never played young players unless forced into it due to injuries.  NEVER.  Think back through all the players and you won't find one that Doc put on the court unless he had to: Al, Perk, Rondo, Gomes, Powe, BBD...  Everyone of them could play but couldn't get on the court until Doc had no choice.  Once there, they showed the fans were right to call for them to get the PT to show they could play.

I've have difficulty understanding why some people here support Doc's judgement concerning young player's abilities and saying they're not ready to contribute on the court --> he has a poor track record of judging a young player's ability to contribute. 

At this point in the season, I understand the team's need to wrap up a high seed (HCA is extremely optimistic at this point) but burning out PP and Ray is only going to cost us in the playoffs.  Giving Walker/Giddens 5-8 minutes of PT while we're down some players can only help PP and Ray retain some energy both for the current games and the playoffs.
Could you please explain how Doc was forced to play:

Perk - he had other options including Blount, LaFrentz and others. Perk still got big minutes even though he was only in his late teens and early 20's.

Rondo - Rondo first year he showed flashes but wasn't ready and justly sat because Delonte and Telfair were other options. Even last year Doc had other options and could have played Eddie huge minutes at PG but Rondo earned the PT.

Davis - he was a rookie last year and Powe and a shortened rotation could easily have rendered him a DNP-CD for most of the season. Instead he was extremely inconsistent but showed flashes of a real good game. This year his game has grown and he's earned everything he's getting in regards to playing time.

Powe - very similar to Davis. He had Big Al in front of him in Big Al's break out year and yet got some decent minutes. Last year Posey and a very short rotation could have rendered him useless. But he got steadily better and earned everything he got.

These are just the players on this squad. I won't even go into Doc use of Big Al in the playoffs as an unproven rookie Doc's first year here or some of the young players he used in Orlando.

But the facts just do not support this claim that seems to be so prevalent. On this current championship squad we have a 25 year old center starting, a 23 year old PG starting and a 23 and a 24 year old as our backups up front and all 4 players were key in earning that championship last year. If Pruitt, Walker and Giddens were good enough they would be getting minutes. They just don't have what it takes yet to give this team what it needs.

Re: Walker and Giddens, Again.
« Reply #10 on: February 27, 2009, 10:35:59 AM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
Nick, the assumption that players don't get to play because they're not ready to play is simply flawed. It's simply one of the numerous possibilities of why someone doesn't get on the floor. There are too many examples throughout the history of the NBA of a player eating the bench, then given the chance to play (because someone got hurt) and blossoming.

There has to be a bigger picture here, other than trying to win games... and there's really that prevents us from winning inspite of giving either Walker or Giddens some minutes that aren't garbage minutes. There's really only so much you can experience in practices, Doc has to find a way to better balance the way he handles his rotations and minutes by inserting players earlier in the game, instead of relying on the team being up by 30 points just to give some players a couple of minutes. And more so now with a depleted roster with all the injuries.

If you put them in, they play bad, you sit them. It's quite simple. Nothing really lost.

Wouldn't another possibility be that the reason why Ainge brought them back up from D-League is because he feels they're ready to play?

And although I don't particularly believe this, but apparently it has been reported, that the reason that Ainge only signed House last year during the offseason was to force Doc to play Rondo? Is there any truth to that?
« Last Edit: February 27, 2009, 10:45:11 AM by BudweiserCeltic »

Re: Walker and Giddens, Again.
« Reply #11 on: February 27, 2009, 10:49:51 AM »

Offline ManUp

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8511
  • Tommy Points: 285
  • Rondo doesn't believe in easy buckets...
Doc has never played young players unless forced into it due to injuries.  NEVER.  Think back through all the players and you won't find one that Doc put on the court unless he had to: Al, Perk, Rondo, Gomes, Powe, BBD...  Everyone of them could play but couldn't get on the court until Doc had no choice.  Once there, they showed the fans were right to call for them to get the PT to show they could play.

I've have difficulty understanding why some people here support Doc's judgement concerning young player's abilities and saying they're not ready to contribute on the court --> he has a poor track record of judging a young player's ability to contribute. 

At this point in the season, I understand the team's need to wrap up a high seed (HCA is extremely optimistic at this point) but burning out PP and Ray is only going to cost us in the playoffs.  Giving Walker/Giddens 5-8 minutes of PT while we're down some players can only help PP and Ray retain some energy both for the current games and the playoffs.
Could you please explain how Doc was forced to play:

Perk - he had other options including Blount, LaFrentz and others. Perk still got big minutes even though he was only in his late teens and early 20's.

Rondo - Rondo first year he showed flashes but wasn't ready and justly sat because Delonte and Telfair were other options. Even last year Doc had other options and could have played Eddie huge minutes at PG but Rondo earned the PT.

Davis - he was a rookie last year and Powe and a shortened rotation could easily have rendered him a DNP-CD for most of the season. Instead he was extremely inconsistent but showed flashes of a real good game. This year his game has grown and he's earned everything he's getting in regards to playing time.

Powe - very similar to Davis. He had Big Al in front of him in Big Al's break out year and yet got some decent minutes. Last year Posey and a very short rotation could have rendered him useless. But he got steadily better and earned everything he got.

These are just the players on this squad. I won't even go into Doc use of Big Al in the playoffs as an unproven rookie Doc's first year here or some of the young players he used in Orlando.

But the facts just do not support this claim that seems to be so prevalent. On this current championship squad we have a 25 year old center starting, a 23 year old PG starting and a 23 and a 24 year old as our backups up front and all 4 players were key in earning that championship last year. If Pruitt, Walker and Giddens were good enough they would be getting minutes. They just don't have what it takes yet to give this team what it needs.

To be fair his argument was that Doc only plays them out of necessity, not that he doesn't play them. Perk might be the only instance in which Doc chose to play a young guy.

Powe- He played on a horrible team with little to no, depth, and a lot of injuries.

Davis- we needed his bulk, becaused of lack of depth at the center position. Pollard was just a warm body, who was constantly injured, and Powe doesn't have the body to cover centers.

Rondo- Injuries got him time as a rookie, even though he seemed to be better than telfair since day one, in my opinion. He got to start last year because he was the only pointguard on the team.

Sometimes Doc puts too much value into veterans, and experience. Of course if you show you can be a positive in extended minutes on the court he will continue to give you minutes. The problem is that young players rarely get the extended minutes needed to prove themselves.

If I remember correctly Big Al didn't even start at the beginning of his break out 06-07 season. The starting lineup that season, If I'm not mistaken, was Telfair, West, Wally, Pierce, Ratliff, with Big Al coming off the bench. Pierce! was our power forward when Al was perfectly healthy on the bench. Luckily for Al, Ratlif got injured that first game,. and Doc had to start him the next few games.

Doc is horrible with gauging when young players are ready to contribute. I don't buy his, "earn their minutes in practice" crap. It might apply to vets, on his team, but doesn't seem like it for the youngins.

Re: Walker and Giddens, Again.
« Reply #12 on: February 27, 2009, 10:53:51 AM »

Offline TrueGreen

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 489
  • Tommy Points: 22
Walker and Giddens are rookies, not saviours. Pruitt has not shown that he is the backup pg we need. There are less than 30 games left to play and we are not playing as well as we should be despite the record. The goals for the rest of the season are to get home court advantage, especially for the East, rest our players, get practice time and most important, improve our play such as in reducing turnovers and making our free throws. To do this this we need to play the players who will be playing in the playoffs. This excludes Giddens, Walker and (Pruitt). These three all have talent, but they are not NBA ready at this time.

Re: Walker and Giddens, Again.
« Reply #13 on: February 27, 2009, 10:59:27 AM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
Walker and Giddens are rookies, not saviours. Pruitt has not shown that he is the backup pg we need. There are less than 30 games left to play and we are not playing as well as we should be despite the record. The goals for the rest of the season are to get home court advantage, especially for the East, rest our players, get practice time and most important, improve our play such as in reducing turnovers and making our free throws. To do this this we need to play the players who will be playing in the playoffs. This excludes Giddens, Walker and (Pruitt). These three all have talent, but they are not NBA ready at this time.

The question, then, is how do we backup the 3 going forward, while still getting rest for Paul and Ray down the stretch?  Is that possible without playing Walker?

If Ray is the primary backup for Paul, how do you limit Ray's minutes, while also keeping Ray and Paul in the game at the same time for long stretches?

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: Walker and Giddens, Again.
« Reply #14 on: February 27, 2009, 11:01:27 AM »

Offline TrueGreen

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 489
  • Tommy Points: 22
"Doc is horrible with gauging when young players are ready to contribute. I don't buy his, "earn their minutes in practice" crap. It might apply to vets, on his team, but doesn't seem like it for the youngins."---ManUp
Yeah, Doc is terrible. Fancy dunks do not make a player ready to play in the NBA. And I think Rondo just turned 23 meaning he was 22 when he was the point guard on the World Champion Boston Celtics. Is 22 young enough?