Author Topic: Celtics (44-11) at Jazz (31-23) 2/19  (Read 86701 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (44-11) at Jazz (31-23) 2/19
« Reply #165 on: February 20, 2009, 12:19:29 AM »

Offline bruinsandceltics

  • NGT
  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2691
  • Tommy Points: 130
  • ANYTHING is posssiiibbbbllee
Good news, not an Achilles. Bad news, we don't know yet what it is.

Come on dude, be just a little positive, it's not that hard.

I'll post what I want to post, but thanks for the advice.

Grow up. He wasn't insulting you, just asking you not to be negative.

Re: Celtics (44-11) at Jazz (31-23) 2/19
« Reply #166 on: February 20, 2009, 12:19:39 AM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
Gee, the announcers are being awfully negative also, because they keep saying that we do not know how bad it is. I hate these negative announcers. They think they are doctors or something speculating what might be wrong with Garnett. How dare they.

Re: Celtics (44-11) at Jazz (31-23) 2/19
« Reply #167 on: February 20, 2009, 12:20:09 AM »

Offline Celtic

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3770
  • Tommy Points: 55
  • TRANSFORMATION INTO CHAMPION COMPLETE!!!
Strained right knee, if that's all it is, not a big deal, the C's will still beat the Jazz even without KG.

Re: Celtics (44-11) at Jazz (31-23) 2/19
« Reply #168 on: February 20, 2009, 12:20:42 AM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
Good news, not an Achilles. Bad news, we don't know yet what it is.

Come on dude, be just a little positive, it's not that hard.

I'll post what I want to post, but thanks for the advice.

Grow up. He wasn't insulting you, just asking you not to be negative.

Thanks for all the advice tonight, guys. They just reported a strained right knee as reported by the Celtics.

Re: Celtics (44-11) at Jazz (31-23) 2/19
« Reply #169 on: February 20, 2009, 12:21:04 AM »

Offline Celtic

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3770
  • Tommy Points: 55
  • TRANSFORMATION INTO CHAMPION COMPLETE!!!
Good news, not an Achilles. Bad news, we don't know yet what it is.

Come on dude, be just a little positive, it's not that hard.

I'll post what I want to post, but thanks for the advice.

And we know what you'll post, doomsday scenarios.

Re: Celtics (44-11) at Jazz (31-23) 2/19
« Reply #170 on: February 20, 2009, 12:22:12 AM »

Offline bruinsandceltics

  • NGT
  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2691
  • Tommy Points: 130
  • ANYTHING is posssiiibbbbllee
Gee, the announcers are being awfully negative also, because they keep saying that we do not know how bad it is. I hate these negative announcers. They think they are doctors or something speculating what might be wrong with Garnett. How dare they.

They are not Celtics fans. You are supposed to be a fan, you don't get paid to analyse. Its not like he was asking you to jump off a roof, he asked you to be positive.

You really need to grow up.

Re: Celtics (44-11) at Jazz (31-23) 2/19
« Reply #171 on: February 20, 2009, 12:22:40 AM »

Offline illantari

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 741
  • Tommy Points: 112
At any rate I hope KG will be OK soon.  He's missed quite a few games this year.


Re: Celtics (44-11) at Jazz (31-23) 2/19
« Reply #172 on: February 20, 2009, 12:23:11 AM »

Offline USG

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2126
  • Tommy Points: 161
So, just to perhaps ease my mind, a torn ACL MCL cannot be mistaken for a strained right knee, can it?

Can it?

'Cause that would be SO wrong.

Re: Celtics (44-11) at Jazz (31-23) 2/19
« Reply #173 on: February 20, 2009, 12:23:50 AM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
Gee, the announcers are being awfully negative also, because they keep saying that we do not know how bad it is. I hate these negative announcers. They think they are doctors or something speculating what might be wrong with Garnett. How dare they.

They are not Celtics fans. You are supposed to be a fan, you don't get paid to analyse. Its not like he was asking you to jump off a roof, he asked you to be positive.

You really need to grow up.

I like getting advice from a guy who has made 29 posts -- thanks. ANd thanks for telling me how to be a fan. Unreal.

Re: Celtics (44-11) at Jazz (31-23) 2/19
« Reply #174 on: February 20, 2009, 12:24:26 AM »

Offline MattG12

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3638
  • Tommy Points: 997
  • PEACE
Good news, not an Achilles. Bad news, we don't know yet what it is.

Come on dude, be just a little positive, it's not that hard.

I'll post what I want to post, but thanks for the advice.

Grow up. He wasn't insulting you, just asking you not to be negative.

Thanks for all the advice tonight, guys. They just reported a strained right knee as reported by the Celtics.

So much for your expertise on achilles injuries.

Re: Celtics (44-11) at Jazz (31-23) 2/19
« Reply #175 on: February 20, 2009, 12:24:40 AM »

Offline USG

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2126
  • Tommy Points: 161
What's going on with the sound?

Re: Celtics (44-11) at Jazz (31-23) 2/19
« Reply #176 on: February 20, 2009, 12:24:48 AM »

Offline TatteredOnMySleeve

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1942
  • Tommy Points: 107
At any rate I hope KG will be OK soon.  He's missed quite a few games this year.



for KG he's missed alot of games, but not really in general
When you got it going, you got it going. I just keep my focus down the stretch. That's when I want the ball. I'm just not afraid to fail."-PaulPierce

Re: Celtics (44-11) at Jazz (31-23) 2/19
« Reply #177 on: February 20, 2009, 12:25:08 AM »

Offline Thruthelookingglass

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2687
  • Tommy Points: 133
jazz are shooting a pathetic 29.5% and only down by one. oh thats right, terrible freethrow disadvantage.. this is becoming a trend lately  ::)

Not that I am defending the officiating, but a team WILL shoot poorly when they are really getting fouled a lot.  The statistics witchdoctors would call that a positive correlation.  In this case, I think that a conclusion based on the statistics would be wrong, namely, that the C's are committing an extraordinary amount of fouls to cause Utah's poor shooting.

Re: Celtics (44-11) at Jazz (31-23) 2/19
« Reply #178 on: February 20, 2009, 12:25:14 AM »

Offline bruinsandceltics

  • NGT
  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2691
  • Tommy Points: 130
  • ANYTHING is posssiiibbbbllee
quote author=vinnie link=topic=25721.msg430231#msg430231 date=1235107430]
Gee, the announcers are being awfully negative also, because they keep saying that we do not know how bad it is. I hate these negative announcers. They think they are doctors or something speculating what might be wrong with Garnett. How dare they.

They are not Celtics fans. You are supposed to be a fan, you don't get paid to analyse. Its not like he was asking you to jump off a roof, he asked you to be positive.

You really need to grow up.

I like getting advice from a guy who has made 29 posts -- thanks. ANd thanks for telling me how to be a fan. Unreal.
[/quote]

Post counts matter? Excuse me for not living on a message board.

Anyway you act like you have that many more, 57.  ???

Re: Celtics (44-11) at Jazz (31-23) 2/19
« Reply #179 on: February 20, 2009, 12:25:26 AM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
Obviously they have to determine the severity of the injury, but Anrday Blatche sprained his knee in late January and they said he will be out 2-4 weeks. Hope that is not the case here. As for this game, the Celtics might not have enough players to finish the game if Bavetta has his way.