Author Topic: No Love for Love  (Read 7939 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

No Love for Love
« on: January 28, 2009, 06:34:25 PM »

Offline Brickowski

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4207
  • Tommy Points: 423
Kevin Love was not selected to play in the rookie-sophomore game on all star weekend.

Since Love is my leading candidate for rookie of the year, I view that as a glaring omission.

Re: No Love for Love
« Reply #1 on: January 28, 2009, 06:42:54 PM »

Offline jackson_34

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2036
  • Tommy Points: 166
I can't believe he wasnt! I suppose there are only ten roster spots available and looking at the list, there's noone selected who doesn't deserve a spot. I might have selected Love over Gasol but I still think Marc deserves a spot.

On a side note; I could watch Kevin Love Outlet pass all day. My oh my does he have a strong arm!


Re: No Love for Love
« Reply #2 on: January 28, 2009, 06:46:33 PM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
How a about a link?

Re: No Love for Love
« Reply #3 on: January 28, 2009, 06:50:51 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
How a about a link?

Link.

Rosters:

Kevin Durant
Jeff Green
Al Horford
Al Thornton
Thaddeus Young
Wilson Chandler
Rodney Stuckey
Aaron Brooks
Luis Scola

vs.

Derek Rose
O.J. Mayo
Marc Gasol
Rudy Fernandez
Greg Oden
Russell Westbrook
Michael Beasley
Eric Gordon
Brook Lopez
« Last Edit: January 28, 2009, 06:56:43 PM by Roy Hobbs »

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: No Love for Love
« Reply #4 on: January 28, 2009, 06:52:55 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52798
  • Tommy Points: 2568
Love should be a candidate for RoY but he isn't.

Not surprising he didn't get selected for the rookie game at All Star weekend. He hasn't been getting credit for his good play all season.

Re: No Love for Love
« Reply #5 on: January 28, 2009, 06:55:03 PM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
How a about a link?

Link.

Thanks. Tough choices, there were quite a few rookies deserving.

Re: No Love for Love
« Reply #6 on: January 28, 2009, 06:56:01 PM »

Offline KungPoweChicken

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2102
  • Tommy Points: 228
Love should be a candidate for RoY but he isn't.

Not surprising he didn't get selected for the rookie game at All Star weekend. He hasn't been getting credit for his good play all season.

Trading Mayo for Love was a mammoth sized error by McHale.

Re: No Love for Love
« Reply #7 on: January 28, 2009, 06:58:01 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
Here's a comparison between Love, Gasol, Lopez, and Oden:  Link.

They're all pretty equal.  Love probably gets knocked down a bit for his shooting percentage, but he's also the best rebounder.  Oden could be argued to be the worst of the four players right now, but the NBA isn't going to leave him off the team, for obvious reasons.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: No Love for Love
« Reply #8 on: January 28, 2009, 07:02:46 PM »

Offline Brickowski

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4207
  • Tommy Points: 423
Love should be a candidate for RoY but he isn't.

Not surprising he didn't get selected for the rookie game at All Star weekend. He hasn't been getting credit for his good play all season.

Trading Mayo for Love was a mammoth sized error by McHale.

No, it was a mammoth sized error by Wallace.  Love is a winner.  Mayo is a selfish gunner who will put up individual numbers but never win anything until he learns about sharing the ball.

And that's why MN is winning and Memphis is losing, losing, losing.  And don't tell me that MN has more talent.  It doesn't.  Sure, the Wolves have Jefferson, but the Grizz have Rudy Gay, plus THREE point guards who are better than Telfair.

Re: No Love for Love
« Reply #9 on: January 28, 2009, 07:05:17 PM »

Offline KungPoweChicken

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2102
  • Tommy Points: 228
Love should be a candidate for RoY but he isn't.

Not surprising he didn't get selected for the rookie game at All Star weekend. He hasn't been getting credit for his good play all season.

Trading Mayo for Love was a mammoth sized error by McHale.

No, it was a mammoth sized error by Wallace.  Love is a winner.  Mayo is a selfish gunner who will put up individual numbers but never win anything until he learns about sharing the ball.

And that's why MN is winning and Memphis is losing, losing, losing.  And don't tell me that MN has more talent.  It doesn't.  Sure, the Wolves have Jefferson, but the Grizz have Rudy Gay, plus THREE point guards who are better than Telfair.



I respectfully disagree with all the points you made. Regardless of position, Mayo is a better player than Love will ever be.

Re: No Love for Love
« Reply #10 on: January 28, 2009, 07:11:49 PM »

Offline winsomme

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6058
  • Tommy Points: 255
mmm, Gasol is having a solid year, but how many GMs would take Gasol over Love if they were drafting between the two...

Re: No Love for Love
« Reply #11 on: January 28, 2009, 07:20:23 PM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
Love should really be in the game. They only picked ONE PF in Beasley.

Re: No Love for Love
« Reply #12 on: January 28, 2009, 07:20:43 PM »

Offline Toine43

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1352
  • Tommy Points: 219
  • "Spare change?"
I don't have an opinion on who he should replace, but the 4th most effecient rebounder in the entire NBA should not be left out of this game.


Eddie House - for THREEEEEEE!

Re: No Love for Love
« Reply #13 on: January 28, 2009, 07:27:02 PM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
Love should be a candidate for RoY but he isn't.

Not surprising he didn't get selected for the rookie game at All Star weekend. He hasn't been getting credit for his good play all season.

Trading Mayo for Love was a mammoth sized error by McHale.

No, it was a mammoth sized error by Wallace.  Love is a winner.  Mayo is a selfish gunner who will put up individual numbers but never win anything until he learns about sharing the ball.

And that's why MN is winning and Memphis is losing, losing, losing.  And don't tell me that MN has more talent.  It doesn't.  Sure, the Wolves have Jefferson, but the Grizz have Rudy Gay, plus THREE point guards who are better than Telfair.



I respectfully disagree with all the points you made. Regardless of position, Mayo is a better player than Love will ever be.

  A 20 year old rookie that's a top 5 rebounder in the league is nothing to sneeze at, especially considering that he spends most of his time playing with another strong rebounder (Jefferson). People are writing him off awfully early.

Re: No Love for Love
« Reply #14 on: January 28, 2009, 07:29:39 PM »

Offline cordobes

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3556
  • Tommy Points: 576
  • Basketball is like chess, only without the dice
Should be in. Stats don't make justice to this kind of player though. Funny episode to writers to use in the future.

An interesting article on Love's rebounding:
http://myespn.go.com/blogs/truehoop/0-38-89/Pop-Quiz--Rookies-Can-Rebound.html