Author Topic: Hall of Fame probability  (Read 4611 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Hall of Fame probability
« Reply #15 on: January 27, 2009, 06:03:56 PM »

Offline BigAlTheFuture

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6360
  • Tommy Points: 458
LOL at McGrady.
PHX Suns: Russell Westbrook, Chris Bosh, Tristan Thompson, Trevor Ariza, Tony Allen, Trey Lyles, Corey Brewer, Larry Nance Jr., Trey Burke, Troy Daniels, Joffrey Lauvergne, Justin Holiday, Mike Muscala, 14.6

Re: Hall of Fame probability
« Reply #16 on: January 27, 2009, 06:41:06 PM »

Offline Birdbrain

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2939
  • Tommy Points: 235
  • 36 charges and counting..
I hate hate hate this.

First, the author is clearly using a technique called data mining. Just looking for the best fitting model with little mechanistic understanding. By doing a regression on every combination of variables, he's finding those variables that correlate best with HOF entry. Correlation does not equal causation. This is why height is a covariate. I don't really believe that HOF voters weigh height of the players that heavily.

Second, MVPs get too much weight. Yes, you could argue that every MVP winner is in the HOF. But is that because he won an MVP or because his other stats and championships won are higher?

Third, all star game selections? Really? Considering Yi was almost voted in by the (Chinese) fans and that T-Mac and AI continue to start the games doesn't give much credence to this predictor.

Fourth, I love statistics (as you know), but there are some things they can't show. Defense (besides steals and blocks - which are used in this formula), intangibles and leadership abilities, for example. That's why trying to predict a player's HOF chances using this formula is just stupid.

Looking at some of the rankings gives me a heart attack:

Reggie Miller (185)
Artis Gilmore (147)
Chris Mullen (145)

are all lower than

Antoine Walker (133)
Jack Sikma (105)
Gilbert Arenas (92)

And the all-time assists and steals leader John Stockton at 75 with an 81% chance of HOF entry? Are you freaking kidding me?

Thank you for this post. TP.
Little Fockers 1.5/10
Gulliver's Travels 1/10
Grown Ups -20/10
Tron Legacy 6.5/10

Re: Hall of Fame probability
« Reply #17 on: January 28, 2009, 01:53:47 PM »

Offline Rondo_is_better

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2821
  • Tommy Points: 495
  • R.I.P. Nate Dogg
I hate hate hate this.

First, the author is clearly using a technique called data mining. Just looking for the best fitting model with little mechanistic understanding. By doing a regression on every combination of variables, he's finding those variables that correlate best with HOF entry. Correlation does not equal causation. This is why height is a covariate. I don't really believe that HOF voters weigh height of the players that heavily.

Second, MVPs get too much weight. Yes, you could argue that every MVP winner is in the HOF. But is that because he won an MVP or because his other stats and championships won are higher?

Third, all star game selections? Really? Considering Yi was almost voted in by the (Chinese) fans and that T-Mac and AI continue to start the games doesn't give much credence to this predictor.

Fourth, I love statistics (as you know), but there are some things they can't show. Defense (besides steals and blocks - which are used in this formula), intangibles and leadership abilities, for example. That's why trying to predict a player's HOF chances using this formula is just stupid.

Looking at some of the rankings gives me a heart attack:

Reggie Miller (185)
Artis Gilmore (147)
Chris Mullen (145)

are all lower than

Antoine Walker (133)
Jack Sikma (105)
Gilbert Arenas (92)

And the all-time assists and steals leader John Stockton at 75 with an 81% chance of HOF entry? Are you freaking kidding me?

I share your outrage. I didn't know why until you explained the math to me, but I share your outrage. TP.
Grab a few boards, keep the TO's under 14, close out on shooters and we'll win.