He refused to play twice for this team. TWICE!! How is that fulfilling his contractual obligations? And then as greg so astutely pointed out, he has become as big a destraction as he possibly can be without actually being WITH the team. How is that constructive, smart business and how does not living up to your contractual obligation of playing basketball by refusing to play basketball being a good guy.
You need to check your facts soap before patently rejecting what has already been reported by several New York and national media outlets.
You need to show both sides of the story before feeding into negative spew. Marbury said that the way D'Antoni approached him about minutes was that he said, "Hey Stephon, there are X amount of minutes available if you want them," and Marbury said no. It wasn't, "Stephon, go in" and Marbury saying, "No, I refuse." There is a huge difference.
Apparently, Marbury being peaved behind the scenes that D'Antoni told him that he, D'Antoni would be making the decisions as to who starts at PG and not Marbury is acceptable behavior.
Please show proof of this please. When did Marbury say he was angry about D'Antoni making the decisions about who would be starting at the point? The irresponsible nature of your posts in this thread are really unbecoming. You're spinning facts.
Apparently when informed that the Knicks had traded away Jamal Crawford and that the log jam at PG was over and that Marbury could be the starter now and then Marbury refusing to play to the point that it left D'Antoni with only seven players to play one night makes Marbury a model citizen.
What are you talking about? Marbury was never offered to start.
Apparently, because a basketball player showed up in shape to play basketball(wow, amazing, Marbury should be commended for doing what he is under contract to do), the Knicks are the bad guys because they decided for a part of the season that that player wasn't their best option at PG and wanted him coming off the bench.
Again, wrong...Irresponsible, spinning facts, etc. The Knicks didn't decide they wanted Marbury coming off the bench. They decided they didn't want him playing period. Big difference. This truth thing is a huge burden, I'm sure, in your hatred of Marbury but please try to fight through it.
I especially love the fact that he should be lauded for saying that his team mates were"shooting him in the head" and that D'Antoni was a liar.
First of all, who said he should be lauded for that? I think you're just arguing with yourself here. Secondly, how do you know D'Antoni didn't lie about the situation about Marbury refusing to play? You don't. You assume.