i agree with the idea behind this thread. the big three are showing that they are more than just 3 stars, they are more than the sum of their talents. they key is they all want their team to win, not rack up points and stats and inflate their own ego.
as evidence, we can look at folks such a marbury...stats? yes. wins? no. but he keeps playing the way he does to satisfy his own ego first and foremost. team is secondary.
but beyond the big three's lack of ego, is their desire to play WITH other great players and thereby expand their own game.
with the big three, to understand how they play together you shouldnt just add up their points per game as if they were discrete numbers. ("hmmm... paul score 20, ray puts in 24, kg will give us 18...they give us 62 each night!")
each of them not only makes the other two better basketball players than they would be as the leading, sole star on a team, they give each other the chance to have a bad night, and still make the team win.
none of them have to pull the entire celtics team each and everynight. each of them can have one facet of their game not work, but then emphasize another part of their game since the other two can make up for it.
it is something akin to what larry bird used to do. when his shot wasnt falling, he passed and rebounded instead. he used his talents to only be a great player, but also when needed to make the games of the other celtics better.
when garnet's shot isnt falling, he rebounds, pierce and ray can score. paul does not have to score or control the ball everytime the celtics come down the court, as he often did 2 years ago. he trusts his teammates to succeed.
and even when TWO of them are not doing well, the celtics still have one star to pull the team that night.
if all the celtics had on their team were three stars and not stars-without-egos, the celtics would be the knicks.
ainge was brilliant to pick up not only star players, but star players who love to win games more than individual stats.