This team plays well when Rondo and Perkins are playing well. That's why I laugh when I see statements like, "we won the championship last year despite Rondo." What's debatable is whether a good showing from Rondo is an indication that the Celtics are going to win, or a direct cause. Obviously, quality play is going to "cause" victories, but the question that I'm asking, in other words, is how important is Rondo to this team? I think he's essential. The Cs have shown that they can win games without him, but that's because they're such a deep team. They have enough options to gut out a win when not everyone's play is up to par. When the Celtics win like they did last night, it's because Rondo is playing aggresively.