Author Topic: Eddie House  (Read 12045 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Eddie House
« Reply #30 on: July 18, 2008, 02:28:39 PM »

Offline Jon

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6500
  • Tommy Points: 385
As a little side note about Delonte West and the possibility of him returning to Boston, you gotta ask yourself how much he'd actually want to come back.  He'd go from being a starter in Cleveland to being a backup here.  And while I could see him getting 25+ mpg in the regular season, he'd rarely play the closing minutes of close games and his minutes would probably shrink in the playoffs. 

I'd like to see him back, but I'm not sure he'd like to be back. 

Re: Eddie House
« Reply #31 on: July 18, 2008, 02:34:18 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52801
  • Tommy Points: 2568
What I wonder is how many years Danny is comfortable at?
I'd be very uncomfortable with a lengthily contract for Eddie House. I wouldn't go three years and I wouldn't be very happy at two years, although I might offer two years if necessary. He's a solid player and important but he's also easily replaceable and upgradeable. There will be interesting options over the next 12-24 months to upgrade that slot. I don't really want Eddie tied down long/medium term.

I'd be very happy with Eddie on a one year deal. I'd also be willing to offer 2-3mil to make that happen if necessary. There's nobody else at that point guard spot that I rate as an upgrade and I don't think the MLE elsewhere makes much of a difference, also don't want long term MLE type contracts, so I'd be fine with overpaying Eddie House for a shorter (one year) contract. Sort of like Duhon and the Knicks at a much smaller scale.
« Last Edit: July 18, 2008, 02:57:58 PM by Who »

Re: Eddie House
« Reply #32 on: July 18, 2008, 02:37:29 PM »

Offline rondofan1255

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4383
  • Tommy Points: 527
TP. Eddie would look at it as an opportunity to get a bigger payday next year, as his stock could rise even more with exposure. 3 million is a stretch though, I think 2.1 million is just fine.

Re: Eddie House
« Reply #33 on: July 18, 2008, 02:56:18 PM »

Offline paintitgreen

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1109
  • Tommy Points: 154
As a little side note about Delonte West and the possibility of him returning to Boston, you gotta ask yourself how much he'd actually want to come back.  He'd go from being a starter in Cleveland to being a backup here.  And while I could see him getting 25+ mpg in the regular season, he'd rarely play the closing minutes of close games and his minutes would probably shrink in the playoffs. 

I'd like to see him back, but I'm not sure he'd like to be back. 

Not sure I agree. It's true, he'd probably be reluctant to leave the starting point guard spot on Lebron James' team, but I think he'd get a very good amount of minutes in the regular season and the playoffs here in Boston, backing up the point and in a lot of situations, we could probably play Delonte with Rondo. I actually recall a regular season game against the Lakers in 06 where Delonte was a primary defender on Kobe. Not saying you want him doing that all the time, but he can defend a lot of 2s in the NBA, at least for stretches. Plus, on the closing minutes issue, we all saw that Rondo struggled mightily with his shot at times in the playoffs allowing other teams to play off him completely. I think Rondo is a better player than Delonte, but in certain situations, with his shooting ability, West would be a better option.

But I'm not sure we're in a position right now to offer West the kind of money that (a) would bring him back here and (b) would discourage Cleveland from matching.
Go Celtics.

Re: Eddie House
« Reply #34 on: July 18, 2008, 03:23:42 PM »

Offline PRIDE

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 488
  • Tommy Points: 41
House should get a two year deal near the minimum.

I think you throw a 1 or 2 year full MLE deal to Delonte. Cleveland wont match because they don't want to add that kind of salary this year. Unlike Posey, West wouldn't put us in a bad cap situation. You could go 3 years but not for all of the MLE and then sing Bill Walker to a 3 year deal. Jr Giddens will get a 3 year deal already because he is a first round pick.

Re: Eddie House
« Reply #35 on: July 18, 2008, 03:28:58 PM »

Offline crownsy

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8469
  • Tommy Points: 157
House should get a two year deal near the minimum.

I think you throw a 1 or 2 year full MLE deal to Delonte. Cleveland wont match because they don't want to add that kind of salary this year. Unlike Posey, West wouldn't put us in a bad cap situation. You could go 3 years but not for all of the MLE and then sing Bill Walker to a 3 year deal. Jr Giddens will get a 3 year deal already because he is a first round pick.

house wont sign that, he already stated he wants a raise from the min.

“I will hurt you for this. A day will come when you think you’re safe and happy and your joy will turn to ashes in your mouth. And you will know the debt is paid.” – Tyrion

Re: Eddie House
« Reply #36 on: July 18, 2008, 03:33:18 PM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
If Ainge wouldn't even offer Lue the vet minimum, what are the chances House received more than the minimum from the Celtics? Could Ainge value House more than Lue and give House more than the minimum?
You cannot 'not offer' the vet minimum to someone. That's why it is a minimum.

1.2 million is the veteran minimum for Lue. 1.8 million, on the other hand, isn't.

I don't understand.  Why is the vet minimum different for Lue?

Edit:  My bad.  I thought the minimum was $1.8M.
To be precise, the vet minimum is different for each player and is based on his NBA experience. In Lue's case, it is $1.2 million.

In this particular case, Lue was looking for extra 600k (we did offer him the minimum, reportedly), which would have actually cost the club $2 million with the luxury tax and all (thanks Roy for correcting my math ;))
« Last Edit: July 18, 2008, 03:38:55 PM by kozlodoev »
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."

Re: Eddie House
« Reply #37 on: July 18, 2008, 03:50:02 PM »

Offline Jon

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6500
  • Tommy Points: 385
As a little side note about Delonte West and the possibility of him returning to Boston, you gotta ask yourself how much he'd actually want to come back.  He'd go from being a starter in Cleveland to being a backup here.  And while I could see him getting 25+ mpg in the regular season, he'd rarely play the closing minutes of close games and his minutes would probably shrink in the playoffs. 

I'd like to see him back, but I'm not sure he'd like to be back. 

Not sure I agree. It's true, he'd probably be reluctant to leave the starting point guard spot on Lebron James' team, but I think he'd get a very good amount of minutes in the regular season and the playoffs here in Boston, backing up the point and in a lot of situations, we could probably play Delonte with Rondo. I actually recall a regular season game against the Lakers in 06 where Delonte was a primary defender on Kobe. Not saying you want him doing that all the time, but he can defend a lot of 2s in the NBA, at least for stretches. Plus, on the closing minutes issue, we all saw that Rondo struggled mightily with his shot at times in the playoffs allowing other teams to play off him completely. I think Rondo is a better player than Delonte, but in certain situations, with his shooting ability, West would be a better option.

But I'm not sure we're in a position right now to offer West the kind of money that (a) would bring him back here and (b) would discourage Cleveland from matching.

Right.  But my overall point is that West comes here knowing that 9 times out of 10 he's not going to be in the game in the closing minutes of a close one.  Moreover, come playoff time, both Rondo and Allen could be looking at 40 mpg, leaving him only about 16 mpg even if he backs up both spots. 

It'd be one thing if he were playing for the Knicks, but he'd be walking away from a team that almost beat the champion Celtics last year to be a backup on a team with two very good guards who will demand a lot of minutes.  I'd love for him to do it; I'm just not sure I'd count on him wanting to come even if the C's do throw midlevel money at him. 

Re: Eddie House
« Reply #38 on: July 18, 2008, 03:57:07 PM »

Offline P2

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2088
  • Tommy Points: 163
  • Green 18!
You guys really have to keep in mind that Cleveland is severely over the cap, at $80M, which doesn't include Gibson's extension. They would do exactly like we did if they had the Posey situation. Fact is, they won't pay Delonte big money just to be a little closer to the championship, while tying up their future flexibility and paying a HUGE luxury tax this year. They would be much better off signing a cheap guy like House.

Re: Eddie House
« Reply #39 on: July 18, 2008, 03:57:17 PM »

Offline Bankshot

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7540
  • Tommy Points: 632
House should get a two year deal near the minimum.

I think you throw a 1 or 2 year full MLE deal to Delonte. Cleveland wont match because they don't want to add that kind of salary this year. Unlike Posey, West wouldn't put us in a bad cap situation. You could go 3 years but not for all of the MLE and then sing Bill Walker to a 3 year deal. Jr Giddens will get a 3 year deal already because he is a first round pick.

I don't think Delonte is worth the MLE and I doubt Ainge offers it to him.
"If somebody would have told you when he was playing with the Knicks that Nate Robinson was going to change a big time game and he was going to do it mostly because of his defense, somebody would have got slapped."  Mark Jackson

Re: Eddie House
« Reply #40 on: July 18, 2008, 04:02:42 PM »

Offline Jon

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6500
  • Tommy Points: 385
House should get a two year deal near the minimum.

I think you throw a 1 or 2 year full MLE deal to Delonte. Cleveland wont match because they don't want to add that kind of salary this year. Unlike Posey, West wouldn't put us in a bad cap situation. You could go 3 years but not for all of the MLE and then sing Bill Walker to a 3 year deal. Jr Giddens will get a 3 year deal already because he is a first round pick.

I don't think Delonte is worth the MLE and I doubt Ainge offers it to him.

I agree.  But he might not be a bad 1 year pickup at the MLE.  If he wants more years, he'd have to take less money.  But 1 year at the MLE certainly wouldn't be a terrible move as he could solve the backup PG and SG spots and possibly make Giddens as the backup 3 a viable option. 

Re: Eddie House
« Reply #41 on: July 18, 2008, 04:40:14 PM »

Offline paintitgreen

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1109
  • Tommy Points: 154
Right.  But my overall point is that West comes here knowing that 9 times out of 10 he's not going to be in the game in the closing minutes of a close one.  Moreover, come playoff time, both Rondo and Allen could be looking at 40 mpg, leaving him only about 16 mpg even if he backs up both spots. 

It'd be one thing if he were playing for the Knicks, but he'd be walking away from a team that almost beat the champion Celtics last year to be a backup on a team with two very good guards who will demand a lot of minutes.  I'd love for him to do it; I'm just not sure I'd count on him wanting to come even if the C's do throw midlevel money at him. 

You are probably right about that, Jon. Overall, it's probably a better situation for him in Cleveland, even with the fact that Gibson's minutes will increase this year and the Cavs just committed to five years with him.

If I was DW, though, I would also be wary of signing a 5-year offer sheet with anybody, because I would not want to be stuck in Cleveland from 2010-2013 if Lebron hits the road.

You guys really have to keep in mind that Cleveland is severely over the cap, at $80M, which doesn't include Gibson's extension. They would do exactly like we did if they had the Posey situation. Fact is, they won't pay Delonte big money just to be a little closer to the championship, while tying up their future flexibility and paying a HUGE luxury tax this year. They would be much better off signing a cheap guy like House.

Good point. Maybe they're looking at Gibson taking over West's role, and just looking for somebody to take over Gibson's role from late last year - 3 point shooting off the bench. Maybe. But, see below.

As for Delonte's value - I don't think it's the full MLE, not at all. I'm thinking a salary starting somewhere between $2.5 and 3.5 mil per year is fair for him. But I think Cleveland would probably match despite the fact their payroll will increase to probably about $87 mil (estimating $3 mil contracts for both Delonte and Gibson). Delonte's QO is 2.75 mil, and Cleveland already offered that, so for this year, something around that level will probably not make them stop.

Plus, Cleveland has a problem this year, but doesn't have the long term cap constraints we have - they have about $29 mil in expiring contracts this year and their salary drops to about 57 mil next year (estimating Gibson's deal starts at 3 mil/year). The following year, the only players under contract in Cleveland are Lebron (player option), JJ Hickson (team option) and Daniel Gibson (plus probably 1-2 draft picks at about $1.2 mil salaries).

So they have plenty of cap space after this season; since they've already offered West $2.75 mil for this year, future years at relatively short money shouldn't be a major concern. They will still have space to max out Lebron in 2010 AND offer a max contract to another player. That's got to be their real hope, right? That Amare or Bosh or somebody agrees to come in and join Lebron? They'd probably have to renounce all of Z, Ben Wallace, Sasha and Varejao to do it, but it could be the incentive it takes to keep Lebron from fleeing to Brooklyn or NY.

They would have to fill out the roster with vet. min. players, but maybe Ilgauskas would come back for a couple years at the minimum - a lineup of West, Gibson, Lebron, Bosh/Amare and Ilgauskas, with Hickson and three other first rounders might be a good start, and enough to get a lot of guys to be willing to take minimum contracts.

So while a 5 year, $17.4 million contract (starting at 3 mil with 8% annual raises) for West may cost Cleveland $3 mil extra in luxury tax dollars in 08-09, that still makes it 5 years, $20.4 million. That same offer would cost us an extra $3 in 08-09, $3.24 in 09-10, possibly/probably $3.48 in 10-11, maybe $3.72 in 11-12. So that becomes a much more expensive 5 years and $23.64, $27.12 or even $30.84 million contract for us. To me, considering the Cavs have already invested so much in this year, it actually makes more sense to sign a young guy like Delonte for that kind of money than to let him walk to save $6 mil. Of course, maybe at this point they're just hoping somebody signs him to an offer sheet so they don't have to pay that $5.5 mil ($2.75 QO with luxury tax) to Delonte next year.


Sorry to go so in depth on the Cavs. Back to the Cs. That long term deal makes a little less sense. BUT, I do like what Delonte would bring to us a lot. I think if he did come here, we'd be set at the 1 and 2 spot, and would only have to really address the backup center spot. Like Jon said, go with a Giddens/Walker combo to back up the 3, maybe throw Miles a vet min. contract.
Go Celtics.

Re: Eddie House
« Reply #42 on: July 18, 2008, 10:06:16 PM »

Offline Eja117

  • NCE
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19274
  • Tommy Points: 1254
If my source worked for the NBA I wouldn't be questioning him.

Obviously if there is no others news on this then my source was incorrect and I shall apologize for even bringing up the discussion!






Wait a second. If the source doesn't work for the NBA, or maybe a newspaper or an agent, then I wonder why he can't be revealed

Re: Eddie House
« Reply #43 on: July 19, 2008, 12:03:22 PM »

Offline greenwise

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1117
  • Tommy Points: 136
If my source worked for the NBA I wouldn't be questioning him.

Obviously if there is no others news on this then my source was incorrect and I shall apologize for even bringing up the discussion!





I guess this rumour wasn't true then...  ::)

Re: Eddie House
« Reply #44 on: July 19, 2008, 01:20:57 PM »

Offline acieEarl

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1087
  • Tommy Points: 47
As a little side note about Delonte West and the possibility of him returning to Boston, you gotta ask yourself how much he'd actually want to come back.  He'd go from being a starter in Cleveland to being a backup here.  And while I could see him getting 25+ mpg in the regular season, he'd rarely play the closing minutes of close games and his minutes would probably shrink in the playoffs. 

I'd like to see him back, but I'm not sure he'd like to be back. 

I hear yea

House doesn't make a lot of sense on Cleveland. BGibson is similar to House, a short PG that can stick the open 3 buts not exactly the best PG.

D West was a starter on a very good playoff team. He knows he could be a starter on most teams and he wouldn't be a starter on the Celts. Although throw some decent money at Delonte and he might not really care.

House is all about getting the most out of his next contract, which I can't blame him. He has a ring and has never had a good contract. He's just looking to get a raise and he might be our best option left out there.