I agree in principal, but if the C's do ANY trading in the near term, Scal likely will be part of the equation, simply because of his salary. Not that it's something they're actively looking to dump, but he's one of the few players on the roster with a modest salary that they'd be looking to include as ballast. Trade BBD or Powe, for example, you are VERY limited what you can receive back because they only make what, $600k - $700k? Add Scal in, you've got salary approaching $4M, which makes some smaller deals, or some smaller sign-and-trade deals, at least potential.
At this point, it's only a two-year contract, so he IS moveable. It'll be a trade asset in twelve months, but it's usable now. It's also expiring going into the 2010 offseason, which teams may find especially attractive.
Point being; trades JUST to get rid of Scal are pointless, but most (non-Ray Allen) trades to be proposed will have to include Scal as ballast.
(can that be his new nickname? "Ballast"?)