It still seems to me that Paul does not get his just due. Could it be possible that he is still underrated, after what just happened?
I'm so sick of hearing writers say that Pierce has changed his game so much, and he used to be selfish...blah..blah..blah....Really, has he changed all that much? I believe he has steadily improved, like every other great player approaching 30 yrs old. If you look at the raw numbers, 2002 was when Pierce's assist totals went up a lot. This was a big step for him, and those assist totals have remained this way to this day. Then when Doc got here, his FG% went up, and has stayed that way. This is the normal progression of any superstar. Was Pierce ever really a selfish player? What have I been watching for the last 10 years? His passing has improved, and his shot selection has improved. That is normal development. It's amazing that he has progressed the way he has with the crap he has been surrounded by. He took that 2002 team on his back and carried them to within two wins of the Finals. Ainge immediately dismantled that team, and began the long, arduous task of rebuilding.
Pierce just outplayed Lebron and Kobe in playoff series. That is an undeniable fact. These two are considered the best players in the world. So what is it about them that makes them so much better than the guy who just outplayed them? Pierce outplayed Kobe on the biggest stage, and locked down on defense in game 4 and basically won the series that night. Pierce matched baskets with Lebron in the biggest game of his life, and stole the ball from him at probably the most crucial, precarious moment of the entire playoffs.
Does Pierce have to win a couple more titles before he is finally recognized the way he should be?