If Doc had been Michael's coach or Shaq's coach in their primes he would have been known as a 'great coach'. <g>
TP for you. Phil is a great coach, but he has been handed great teams. That alone continues to separate him from Red.
TP4U
That's what most nowadays analysts miss about the Red vs Phil comparison.
It's one thing to coach 9 championship teams when you have been
given the two best players in the league on every single one of those teams. It is something completely different to build a team and
make it into a nine time championship team.
Red had to build that team from the bottom up and then constantly replace retiring stars with new Hall of Fame talent while still keeping the core motivated and focused and coach them to championships.
Phil had to......what.... say give the ball to Michael or Shaq or Kobe. I'm belittling his accomplishment but there is a huge difference between what Red did and what Phil does(like bail on his championship teams as soon as the superstars move on) and the national media is to busy kissing Phil's butt to explain the difference to the average or johnny come lately basketball fan.
And I think that belittles the legacy of the greatest coach and front office man in league history. It bugs me when the media does that in the NBA. Baseball scribes won't compare Joe Torre to Casey Stengal. Football guys were hesitant to compare Belichick to Paul Brown or Vince Lombardi. After Spygate you will never hear any comparison of that type ever again.
But basketball does it and that really bothers me.