As much as I love Eddie and as much as I've grown to dislike El Huevos, I have a hard time imaging Eddie having any success against the Piston's D last night. They were playing as tough as they've played all season; Hunter would have picked his pocket.
wait like he did to Cassell? 
What are you basing that on? Cassell didn't get ripped by Hunter, nor did Cassell get stuck in corners and forced to throw away the ball. I prefer House over Cassell, except against Detroit. Cassell is able to get the ball up against the pressure, albeit slowly.
unquestionably it's a trade off ---- House *does* have trouble advancing the ball, but Cassell slows the offense down and breaks the team's rhythm. IMO House is the better defender --- though i'll admit that's sort of like saying Perkins is a better FT shooter than Rondo.
I agree with Bucknersrevenge... The Celtics with Eddie House as backup PG went 51-13... we shouldn't be the one's changing to matchup to the Pistons, it should be the other way around... that kind of thinking cost Dallas last year.
People seem to be losing sight of the fact that this series could be worse. We could be down 1-3 or swept. There are changes that can make us worse. For those who like to type but don't actually pay attention to games, House can not handle the defense of either Rip nor Hunter. House was horrific when given minutes in this series. House had his chance. Hunter did not play in the 2nd and 3rd regular season games, allowing House to face Stuckey. When Hunter is available, Flip puts him in any time that House is on the floor, and Hunter locks him down.
There are changes that can make us worse ---- but c'mon there are also changes *not* being made that stand in the way of us playing better. For example, just having House on the court stretches the defense more, gives Pierce more room to operate, frees up the post for rebounders, etc.
Game 1, 2Q: House enters with the C's up by 5, leaves 6 mins later up by 4
Game 1, 3Q: House enters with C's up by 8, leaves 3 mins later (in 4Q) up by 12-
Game 2 1Q: House enters, C's up 2, leaves 5 mins later, game tied
Game 2, 3Q, House enters C's down 4, leaves 2 min later, C's down 9
Pretty even --- hadly the cataclysm folks are making it out to be and pretty hard to pin Gm 2 loss on House.
So if House has trouble vs. Lindsey Hunter let him run at the SG and let Ray Allen or Pierce act as the PG ---- we're talking 10-15 mpg here. Make the 37-year-old Hunter chase House off screens for 10 min. that's what great coaches do, if Flip brings in Hunter, make the change that turns that into a disadvantage...
I'm actually rewatching Gm1 right now and Jeff Van Gundy is making the point that waht you really want to do is have a 9-man rotation set in stone and win/lose with it. (He says Doc hasn't been afforded that b/c of inconsistency... how a 66-win team is now inconsistent, i don't know). I agree with his set-in-stone concept though.
I'm saying Cassell should be insurance... House should always be the first option - as he's been all season - and if Hunter is eating him up, you either come back with Rondo or move to Cassell. But it seems foolish to let DET dictate the matchups before they've had a chance to fall apart.