Author Topic: Nuggets Offseason  (Read 2837 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Nuggets Offseason
« on: May 02, 2008, 01:19:17 PM »

Offline JSD

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12590
  • Tommy Points: 2159
I'm not sure I understand the Logic of trading the only player on the team that plays defense. Why would Denver do this? (http://hoopshype.com/)




I say trade AI for defense

Re: Nuggets Offseason
« Reply #1 on: May 02, 2008, 01:22:41 PM »

Offline JSD

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12590
  • Tommy Points: 2159
Ok so if the Celtics don't win it all this year would you make this Trade?

Scal, Perk and Tony allen

For

Camby

Re: Nuggets Offseason
« Reply #2 on: May 02, 2008, 01:25:14 PM »

Offline shookones99

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 911
  • Tommy Points: 73
Ok so if the Celtics don't win it all this year would you make this Trade?

Scal, Perk and Tony allen

For

Camby

I would do that in a second.  But why would Denver do that?   TA and Scal wouldn't get any burn there and Perk is just a downgrade from Camby
When I'm in the gym...I like to grunt when  I get my swell on... That way everyone can see how jacked and tan I am.

Re: Nuggets Offseason
« Reply #3 on: May 02, 2008, 01:49:45 PM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34114
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
Ok so if the Celtics don't win it all this year would you make this Trade?

Scal, Perk and Tony allen

For

Camby

No.  With KG at PF, the Celtics need a C that is a better man on defender at C, not the great weakside blocker/defender. 


Rather the Celtics go for a cheaper option as a 2nd C to compliment Perkins.  (I would love to find a way to add Diop)



Plus, there is no chance the Celtics will add a fourth near max player.