I saw the whole Greg Dickerson interview the way yall descibed it and yeah, if I was a Hawks fan and was picking up that interview on You-Tube or through other media outlets, I'd be pretty steamed right now.
As I said earlier this morning, much earlier, I don't understand Stern's stance of not believing Danny Ainge, Paul Pierce and the video proof of past use of the sign before games. What is he trying to prove?
If it was a menacing gesture you would probably be hearing nothing from Danny as Danny would probably let Pierce pay his penalty. I don't see the Washington GM running to DeShawn Stevenson's defense and in the past don't remember a whole lot of times where the GM of a fined athlete got so behind a player.
For suspensions, sure there have been tons of times when the GMs complained and ran to the defense of their athlete, going so far as pressuring for leniency during the appeal. But a for pocket change fine?! I've never heard of it, although that doesn't necessarily mean it has never happened.
Then the cocky way he addressed the possibility of an appeal and believing in Ainge's explanation was rather unprofessional for a man of his stature in my book.